Literature DB >> 31843692

Prophylactic Enoxaparin Adjusted by Anti-Factor Xa Peak Levels Compared with Recommended Thromboprophylaxis and Rates of Clinically Evident Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Oncology Patients.

Katherine Kramme1, Paya Sarraf2, Gitonga Munene3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies among populations at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) have demonstrated that recommended doses for enoxaparin thromboprophylaxis are associated with high incidence of subprophylactic anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) levels. This study examines the efficacy and safety of dose-adjusted enoxaparin guided by anti-Xa levels. STUDY
DESIGN: Patients undergoing abdominal cancer operation had dose adjustments based on peak anti-Xa levels to attain a target of >0.20 IU/mL were prospectively enrolled and compared with a historic cohort of patients receiving recommended thromboprophylaxis. Incidence of in-hospital VTE and major bleeding after changes in enoxaparin dosing were monitored.
RESULTS: The study population comprised 197 patients-64 patients in the prospective intervention group and 133 patients in the control group. Baseline characteristic were similar between the intervention and control groups, with the exception of the Caprini score (8.09 vs 7.26; p = 0.013). In the intervention group, 50 of 64 patients (78.1%) initially had subprophylactic peak anti-Xa levels. The VTE rates were lower in the intervention group than the control group (0% vs 8.27%; p = 0.018). There were no differences in major bleeding events (3.12% vs 1.50%; p = 0.597), rates of postoperative packed RBC transfusion (17.2% vs 23.3%; p = 0.426), or mean Hgb on discharge (9.58 vs 9.37g/dL; p = 0.414). Therapeutic anti-Xa levels correlated positively with age (65.7 vs 58.2 years; p = 0.022) and correlated negatively with operating room time (203 vs 281 minutes; p = 0.032) and BMI (25.3 vs 29.2 kg/m2; p = 0.037).
CONCLUSIONS: Thromboprophylactic enoxaparin 40 mg daily is often associated with subprophylactic peak anti-Xa levels. Dose adjustment based on anti-Xa levels increased the daily enoxaparin dose, resulting in a lower rate of in-hospital VTE without increased risk of bleeding.
Copyright © 2019 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843692     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.11.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  5 in total

1.  Updated guidelines to reduce venous thromboembolism in trauma patients: A Western Trauma Association critical decisions algorithm.

Authors:  Eric J Ley; Carlos V R Brown; Ernest E Moore; Jack A Sava; Kimberly Peck; David J Ciesla; Jason L Sperry; Anne G Rizzo; Nelson G Rosen; Karen J Brasel; Rosemary Kozar; Kenji Inaba; Matthew J Martin
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 3.313

2.  Mysterious Arm Swelling in a Patient With Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Complicated by Superior Vena Cava Syndrome.

Authors:  Jessica S Jang; Jeffrey S Jang
Journal:  J Adv Pract Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01

3.  Anti-factor Xa Activity Is Not Associated With Venous Thromboembolism in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Enoxaparin for Thromboprophylaxis: A Retrospective Observational Study.

Authors:  Christoph Dibiasi; Johannes Gratz; Marion Wiegele; Andreas Baierl; Eva Schaden
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-29

4.  Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis after Major Abdominal Surgery: Should the Duration be Individualized?

Authors:  Chrysanthi Papageorgopoulou; Konstantinos Nikolakopoulos; Charalampos Seretis
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2022-06-24

5.  Venous thromboembolism in critically ill COVID-19 patients receiving prophylactic or therapeutic anticoagulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Syed Shahzad Hasan; Sam Radford; Chia Siang Kow; Syed Tabish Razi Zaidi
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.300

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.