Literature DB >> 31843633

Thoracoscopic Surgery Without Drainage Tube Placement for Peripheral Lung Nodules.

Hsien-Chi Liao1, Shun-Mao Yang2, Ming-Hui Hung3, Ya-Jung Cheng4, Hsao-Hsun Hsu5, Jin-Shing Chen6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although drainage tube placement after thoracoscopic pulmonary resection is considered mandatory, the drainless approach after pulmonary resections may be feasible in selected patients. We aimed to determine whether a drainless approach is safe and associated with shorter hospital stay after thoracoscopic surgery for peripheral lung nodules.
METHODS: This single-center, open-label, parallel-group, prospective, randomized, controlled trial enrolled patients with peripheral lung nodules treated with uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection. After confirming the absence of air leaks and before closing the wound, patients were allocated to receive or not receive drainage using a chest tube, according to a preestablished randomization sequence provided in sealed envelopes. The primary end point was the length of postoperative hospital stay.
RESULTS: Of 107 patients who agreed to participate in the study between August 2016 and September 2017, 100 were randomized to the drainage group (n = 50) or drainless group (n = 50) for intention-to-treat analysis. Patients in the drainless group had shorter postoperative hospital stay (mean, 1.2 versus 2.6 days; P < .001), shorter surgery duration (mean, 59.0 versus 73.7 minutes; P = .001), and lower pain on postoperative day 1 (mean, 0.9 versus 1.2 points; P = .011). In the drainless group, residual pneumothorax was noted in 31 patients at 6 hours (62%), in 18 patients at 1 day (36%), and in 1 patient at 10 to 14 days after surgery (2%). Medical costs were also substantially lower in the drainless group.
CONCLUSIONS: Uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection without drainage is feasible and safe for selected patients with peripheral lung nodules.
Copyright © 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843633     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.10.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  6 in total

1.  Current role of uniportal video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer treatment.

Authors:  Luciano Bulgarelli Maqueda; Ricardo A J Luengo Falcón; Chiao-Yun Tsai; Alejandro García-Pérez; Anna Minasyan; Diego Gonzalez-Rivas
Journal:  J Clin Transl Res       Date:  2020-09-02

2.  Efficacy and safety of omitting chest drains after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lin Huang; Henrik Kehlet; Bo Laksáfoss Holbek; Tina Kold Jensen; René Horsleben Petersen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 3.005

3.  Tubeless uniportal thoracoscopic wedge resection with modified air leak test and chest tube drainage.

Authors:  Zhengcheng Liu; Rusong Yang; Yang Sun
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.102

4.  A propensity sore-matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni-portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection.

Authors:  Guobing Xu; Jianting Du; Jiarong Zhang; Hao Chen; Bin Zheng; Zhang Yang; Chun Chen
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2022-04-28       Impact factor: 3.223

Review 5.  Thoracic surgery in Taiwan.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 3.005

6.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes with or without routine chest tube drainage after video-assisted thoracoscopic pulmonary resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rongyang Li; Jianhao Qiu; Chenghao Qu; Zheng Ma; Kun Wang; Yu Zhang; Weiming Yue; Hui Tian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.738

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.