Literature DB >> 31843551

Development of novel tenofovir disoproxil phosphate salt with stability enhancement and bioequivalence to the commercial tenofovir disoproxil fumarate salt in rats and beagle dogs.

Jung Hyun Cho1, Han-Gon Choi2.   

Abstract

Tenofovir disoproxil (TD) is very unstable in the solid state under storage conditions. Moreover, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), a commercial salt, is chemically unstable in alkaline solution. In this study, a novel tenofovir disoproxil phosphate (TDP), with stability enhancement and bioequivalence to commercial TDF in rats and beagle dogs, has been developed as an alternative. The TDP and its tablets were easily manufactured, and its physicochemical properties, such as morphology, crystallinity, solubility, lipophilicity and stability were investigated and compared to TD and TDF. Its dissolution and pharmacokinetics were investigated in rats and beagle dogs in comparison to TD and TDF. TDP appeared as an irregularly-shaped crystalline powder with a rough surface, like TDF. However, TDP significantly improved the solubility (7.4 ± 1.3 vs. 28.6 ± 1.0 mg/ml), hydrophilicity (Log P, 0.58 ± 0.03 vs. 0.47 ± 0.04), and aqueous stability (drug concentration over 12 h at pH 6.8 84.0 ± 2.0% vs. 88.2 ± 1.5%) of TD compared to TDF. The TDP gave no significant different plasma concentrations, AUC and Cmax compared to TDF in rats (AUC, 1242.1 ± 584.9 vs. 825.9 ± 79.5 h·ng/ml; Cmax, 154.8 ± 25.4 vs. 210.9 ± 70.3 ng/ml). Moreover, the TDP-loaded tablets were stable for at least six months and provided similar dissolution and bioequivalence to the TDF-loaded commercial product in beagle dogs (AUC, 26,832.7 ± 4093.0 vs. 26,605.3 ± 2530.1 h·ng/ml; Cmax, 4364.0 ± 2061.9 vs. 4186.3 ± 2616.5 ng/ml). Therefore, as an alternative salt, the TDP would be a recommendable candidate with stability enhancement and bioequivalence to the commercial TDF.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioavailability; Bioequivalence; Partition coefficient; Solubility; Stability; Tenofovir disoproxil; Tenofovir disoproxil phosphate

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843551     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  3 in total

1.  Comparative pharmacokinetics between tenofovir disoproxil phosphate and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Sangmi Lee; Eunwoo Kim; Seol Ju Moon; Jina Jung; SeungHwan Lee; Kyung-Sang Yu
Journal:  Transl Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-03-22

2.  Antiulcerogenic and Antibacterial Effects of Chitosan Derivatives on Experimental Gastric Ulcers in Rats.

Authors:  Leudimar Aires Pereira; Luizângela da Silva Reis; Anderson Nogueira Mendes; Hélio de Barros Fernandes; Daniel Dias Rufino Arcanjo; Adalberto Fortes Rodrigues Júnior; Janete Martins Sousa; Humberto Medeiros Barreto; Jailson de Araújo Santos; Josy Anteveli Osajima; Edson C Silva Filho
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Co-crystals, Salts or Mixtures of Both? The Case of Tenofovir Alafenamide Fumarates.

Authors:  Hannes Lengauer; Damjan Makuc; Damjan Šterk; Franc Perdih; Arthur Pichler; Tina Trdan Lušin; Janez Plavec; Zdenko Časar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 6.321

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.