Literature DB >> 31843436

Measuring the performance of patient-specific solutions for minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery.

Ganesha K Thayaparan1, Mark G Owbridge2, Matthew Linden2, Robert G Thompson2, Philip M Lewis3, Paul S D'Urso4.   

Abstract

Pre-surgical planning using 3D-printed BioModels enables the preparation of a "patient-specific" kit to assist instrumented spinal fusion surgery. This approach has the potential to decrease operating time while also offering logistical benefits and cost savings for healthcare. We report our experience with this method in 129 consecutive patients undergoing minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF) over 27 months at a single centre and performed by a single surgeon. Patient imaging and surgical planning software were used to manufacture a 3D-printed patient-specific MIS TLIF kit for each patient consisting of a 1:1 scale spine BioModel, stereotactic K-wire guide, osteotomy guide, and retractors. Pre-selected pedicle screws, rods, and cages were sourced and supplied with the patient-specific kit. Additional implants were available on-shelf to address a size discrepancy between the kit implant and intraoperative measurements. Each BioModel was used pre-operatively for surgical planning, patient consent and education. The BioModel was sterilised for intraoperative reference and navigation purposes. Efficiency measures included operating time (153 ± 44 min), sterile tray usage (14 ± 3), fluoroscopy screening time (57.2 ± 23.7 s), operative waste (19 ± 8 L contaminated, 116 ± 30 L uncontaminated), and median hospital stay (4 days). The pre-selected kit implants exactly matched intraoperative measurements for 597/639 pedicle screws, 249/258 rods, and 46/148 cages. Pedicle screw placement accuracy was 97.8% (625/639) on postoperative CT. Complications included one intraoperative dural tear, no blood products administered, and six reoperations. Our experience demonstrates a viable application of patient-specific 3D-printed solutions and provides a benchmark for studies of efficiency in spinal fusion surgery.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printing; BioModelling; Efficiency; Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Patient-specific

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843436     DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0967-5868            Impact factor:   1.961


  4 in total

Review 1.  [3D printing in spinal surgery-Update].

Authors:  S Roth; S Sehmisch; S Decker
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 2.  Biomaterials for Interbody Fusion in Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Han Zhang; Zhonghan Wang; Yang Wang; Zuhao Li; Bo Chao; Shixian Liu; Wangwang Luo; Jianhang Jiao; Minfei Wu
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-05-17

3.  The Accuracy of Patient-Specific Spinal Drill Guides Is Non-Inferior to Computer-Assisted Surgery: The Results of a Split-Spine Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Peter A J Pijpker; Jos M A Kuijlen; Katalin Tamási; D L Marinus Oterdoom; Rob A Vergeer; Gijs Rijtema; Maarten H Coppes; Joep Kraeima; Rob J M Groen
Journal:  J Pers Med       Date:  2022-06-30

4.  Patient-specific implants for craniomaxillofacial surgery: A manufacturer's experience.

Authors:  Ganesha K Thayaparan; Philip M Lewis; Robert G Thompson; Paul S D'Urso
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-06-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.