Literature DB >> 31843376

Coverage of pharmacogenetic tests by private health insurance companies.

Sharon K Park, Jonathan Thigpen, Insong James Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the coverage of clinically relevant pharmacogenetic tests by the top 41 private insurance companies in the United States.
DESIGN: Websites of insurance companies were searched for medical policies addressing 34 common and clinically relevant pharmacogenetic tests referenced by the Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium, PharmGKB, and Food and Drug Administration product labeling. Those policies were subsequently reviewed for the coverage of the tests by gene-drug pair and by company. Policies were subsequently reviewed to determine coverage of pharmacogenetic tests by gene-drug indication group (GDIG) and an insurance company. SETTINGS AND PARTICIPANTS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Within unique policy sets, the following were analyzed: (1) the number of times each GDIG was mentioned; (2) the percentage of times each GDIG was mentioned; (3) when mentioned, the number of times each GDIG was covered; (4) when mentioned, the percentage of times each GDIG was covered; and (5) regardless of being mentioned, the percentage of times each GDIG was covered.
RESULTS: A total of 223 medical policies mentioning pharmacogenetic tests were retrieved, representing 34 unique policy sets from 41 companies. Thirty-three companies had their policies accessible on their website. Approximately 50% of GDIGs were unanimously mentioned in all policies but were covered only < 20% of the time. When mentioned in a policy, 7 GDIGs were uniformly covered, and 11 GDIGs were uniformly not covered. Overall, insurance companies covered approximately 40% of GDIGs mentioned in their policies.
CONCLUSION: The medical policies addressing recommended pharmacogenetic tests were not readily accessible on websites of the top private health insurance companies. The coverage and payments of the tests varied by the company and gene-drug pairs and remain suboptimal.
Copyright © 2020 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843376     DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2019.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Pharm Assoc (2003)        ISSN: 1086-5802


  5 in total

1.  The Value of Pharmacogenetics to Reduce Drug-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Doreen Z Mhandire; Andrew K L Goey
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 4.074

2.  Pharmacogenetic testing among patients with depression in a US managed care population.

Authors:  Heather D Anderson; Thida M Thant; David P Kao; Kristy R Crooks; Nicholas D Mendola; Christina L Aquilante
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.438

3.  Characterizing pharmacogenetic programs using the consolidated framework for implementation research: A structured scoping review.

Authors:  John H McDermott; Stuart Wright; Videha Sharma; William G Newman; Katherine Payne; Paul Wilson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 4.  DPYD and UGT1A1 Pharmacogenetic Testing in Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: An Overview of the Evidence and Considerations for Clinical Implementation.

Authors:  Lisa A Varughese; Kelsey S Lau-Min; Christine Cambareri; Nevena Damjanov; Ryan Massa; Nandi Reddy; Randall Oyer; Ursina Teitelbaum; Sony Tuteja
Journal:  Pharmacotherapy       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 6.251

5.  Patients with geographic barriers to health care access are prescribed a higher proportion of drugs with pharmacogenetic testing guidelines.

Authors:  Rachel Dalton; Joshua D Brown; Julio D Duarte
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 4.689

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.