Zoë G Hodgson1, L Ruth Comfort2, Arianne A Y Albert3. 1. Department of Midwifery, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. Electronic address: zoe.hodgson@cw.bc.ca. 2. Department of Midwifery, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC; Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC. 3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Women's Health Research Institute, BC Women's Hospital and Health Centre, Vancouver, BC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify adverse neonatal outcomes in a cohort of registered midwife (RM)-attended conventional and water births in British Columbia. METHODS: The study included all term singleton births in British Columbia between January 1, 2005 and March 31, 2016 attended by RMs. Births were allocated to a conventional birth cohort or a water birth cohort according to where the actual birth of the neonate took place. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar <7 at 5 minutes, resuscitation need, neonatal intensive care unit admission). Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, maternal length of labour, and degree of perineal laceration (Canadian Task Force Classification Level II-2). RESULTS: The population included 25 798 births. Of these, 23 201 were conventional, and 2567 were water births. The rate of the composite adverse neonatal outcome was not higher in water births compared with conventional births (hospital conventional, 5.0%; hospital water, 4.2%; home conventional, 3.4%; and home water, 2.9%). Rates of individual components of the composite adverse neonatal score were not greater in the water birth cohort. Maternal outcomes included statistically shorter labours in the water birth cohort and no difference between the cohorts in incidence of third- and fourth-degree lacerations. CONCLUSION: Water births attended by RMs in British Columbia are not associated with higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes than conventional births attended by midwives.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to quantify adverse neonatal outcomes in a cohort of registered midwife (RM)-attended conventional and water births in British Columbia. METHODS: The study included all term singleton births in British Columbia between January 1, 2005 and March 31, 2016 attended by RMs. Births were allocated to a conventional birth cohort or a water birth cohort according to where the actual birth of the neonate took place. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome (Apgar <7 at 5 minutes, resuscitation need, neonatal intensive care unit admission). Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary outcome, maternal length of labour, and degree of perineal laceration (Canadian Task Force Classification Level II-2). RESULTS: The population included 25 798 births. Of these, 23 201 were conventional, and 2567 were water births. The rate of the composite adverse neonatal outcome was not higher in water births compared with conventional births (hospital conventional, 5.0%; hospital water, 4.2%; home conventional, 3.4%; and home water, 2.9%). Rates of individual components of the composite adverse neonatal score were not greater in the water birth cohort. Maternal outcomes included statistically shorter labours in the water birth cohort and no difference between the cohorts in incidence of third- and fourth-degree lacerations. CONCLUSION: Water births attended by RMs in British Columbia are not associated with higher rates of adverse neonatal outcomes than conventional births attended by midwives.
Authors: H Aughey; J Jardine; N Moitt; K Fearon; J Hawdon; D Pasupathy; I Urganci; T Harris Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2021-03-26 Impact factor: 3.007