| Literature DB >> 31843189 |
Hemamali Samaratunga1, Brett Delahunt2, Lars Egevad3, John R Srigley4, Athanase Billis5, David G Bostwick6, Philippe Camparo7, Liang Cheng8, David Clouston9, James Denham10, Bungo Furusato11, Arndt Hartmann12, Laura Jufe13, James Kench14, Diane N Kenwright15, Glen Kristiansen16, Katia R M Leite17, Gregory T MacLennan18, Jennifer Merrimen19, Holger Moch20, Jon Oxley21, Chin-Chen Pan22, Gladell Paner23, Jae Ro24, Isabell A M Sesterhenn25, Jonathan Shanks26, Michelle Thunders15, Toyonori Tsuzuki27, Thomas Wheeler28, John W Yaxley29, Murali Varma30.
Abstract
Infiltration of the prostatic ducts by prostatic adenocarcinoma occurs relatively frequently, being most commonly associated with high grade disease. It is now recognised that intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDCP) has an associated poor prognosis and this is reflected in its histological, molecular and immunohistochemical features. The current recommendation of the World Health Organization is that IDCP not be taken into consideration when grading prostate adenocarcinoma. It is apparent that Gleason did not differentiate between IDCP and stromal invasive carcinoma when developing and validating his grading system, and recent studies suggest that the incorporation of IDCP grading into the overall grading of the specimen provides additional prognostic information.Entities:
Keywords: ISUP grade; Prostate adenocarcinoma; intraductal carcinoma of prostate; prognosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31843189 DOI: 10.1016/j.pathol.2019.11.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pathology ISSN: 0031-3025 Impact factor: 5.306