Literature DB >> 31843072

Therapeutic endometrial scratching and implantation after in vitro fertilization: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Mia Steengaard Olesen1, Benedicte Hauge2, Lisbeth Ohrt2, Tine Nørregaard Olesen3, Janne Roskær3, Vibeke Bæk3, Helle Olesen Elbæk4, Bugge Nøhr5, Mette Nyegaard6, Michael Toft Overgaard7, Peter Humaidan4, Axel Forman8, Inge Agerholm2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study whether endometrial scratching in the luteal phase before ovarian stimulation increases clinical pregnancy rates in women with one or more previous implantation failures.
DESIGN: A nonblinded multicenter randomized clinical trial.
SETTING: Fertility clinics. PATIENT(S): Three hundred four eligible patients scheduled for IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection were randomized. The intervention group (n = 151) underwent endometrial scratching in the luteal phase before controlled ovarian stimulation, while no intervention was performed in the control group (n = 153). INTERVENTION(S): Endometrial scratching with a Pipelle de Cornier catheter in the luteal phase before ovarian stimulation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Clinical pregnancy rate and prenatal and birth data. RESULT(S): There was no overall significant improvement in clinical pregnancy rates between the control and intervention groups (38.5% vs. 44.4%; relative risk = 1.15; confidence interval [0.86-1.55]). However, subgroup analyses revealed that women with three or more previous implantation failures had a significant increase in clinical pregnancy rate (31.1% vs. 53.6%; relative risk = 1.72; confidence interval [1.05-2.83]) after scratching. No difference was seen as regards prenatal and birth data between the two groups. CONCLUSION(S): Endometrial scratching in the luteal phase before ovarian stimulation significantly enhances the clinical pregnancy rate in women with three or more prior implantation failures. This result seems to corroborate previous reports, which found that particularly women with repeated implantation failure seem to gain a positive effect from endometrial scratching. Importantly, there were no significant differences in prenatal data and birth data between the groups. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01963819.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Endometrial scratching; Pipelle de Cornier; endometrial injury; pregnancy rate; repeated implantation failure

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31843072     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.08.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  9 in total

1.  Endometrial scratch to increase live birth rates in women undergoing first-time in vitro fertilisation: RCT and systematic review.

Authors:  Mostafa Metwally; Robin Chatters; Clare Pye; Munya Dimairo; David White; Stephen Walters; Judith Cohen; Tracey Young; Ying Cheong; Susan Laird; Lamiya Mohiyiddeen; Tim Chater; Kirsty Pemberton; Chris Turtle; Jamie Hall; Liz Taylor; Kate Brian; Anya Sizer; Helen Hunter
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.014

2.  The impact of endometrial injury on reproductive outcomes: results of an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Chen Nahshon; Lena Sagi-Dain; Martha Dirnfeld
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-09-17

3.  Optimal time interval between hysteroscopic polypectomy and frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Yi-An Tu; Po-Kai Yang; Shee-Uan Chen; Jehn-Hsiahn Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Endometrial scratching in women with one failed IVF/ICSI cycle-outcomes of a randomised controlled trial (SCRaTCH).

Authors:  N E van Hoogenhuijze; F Mol; J S E Laven; E R Groenewoud; M A F Traas; C A H Janssen; G Teklenburg; J P de Bruin; R H F van Oppenraaij; J W M Maas; E Moll; K Fleischer; M H A van Hooff; C H de Koning; A E P Cantineau; C B Lambalk; M Verberg; A M van Heusden; A P Manger; M M E van Rumste; L F van der Voet; Q D Pieterse; J Visser; E A Brinkhuis; J E den Hartog; M W Glas; N F Klijn; S van der Meer; M L Bandell; J C Boxmeer; J van Disseldorp; J Smeenk; M van Wely; M J C Eijkemans; H L Torrance; F J M Broekmans
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Efficacy of therapies and interventions for repeated embryo implantation failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Busnelli; Edgardo Somigliana; Federico Cirillo; Annamaria Baggiani; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Clinical relevance of a newly developed endometrial receptivity test for patients with recurrent implantation failure in Japan.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ohara; Hidehiko Matsubayashi; Yosuke Suzuki; Yukiko Takaya; Kohei Yamaguchi; Masakazu Doshida; Takumi Takeuchi; Tomomoto Ishikawa; Mika Handa; Tatsuya Miyake; Tsuyoshi Takiuchi; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2022-02-07

7.  Optimal waiting period for frozen embryo transfer after hysteroscopic polypectomy: A propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Bijun Wang; Nan Meng; Wenjuan Zhang; Pingping Kong; Zhaozhao Liu; Wenxia Liu; Huaqing Sun; Wen Zhang; Chenchen Ren; Yichun Guan
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 6.055

8.  Endometrial injury in women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF).

Authors:  Sarah F Lensen; Sarah Armstrong; Ahmed Gibreel; Carolina O Nastri; Nick Raine-Fenning; Wellington P Martins
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-10

9.  Glucocorticoid therapy in assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Yong Jin Kim
Journal:  Clin Exp Reprod Med       Date:  2021-11-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.