Literature DB >> 31842644

1q21 gain but not t(4;14) indicates inferior outcomes in multiple myeloma treated with bortezomib.

Chenxing Du1, Xuehan Mao1, Yan Xu1, Yuting Yan1, Chenglu Yuan2, Xin Du3, Jiahui Liu1, Huishou Fan1, Qi Wang1, Weiwei Sui1, Shuhui Deng1, Mingwei Fu1, Zengjun Li1, Chengwen Li1, Jiawei Zhao1, Shuhua Yi1, Lanting Liu1, Mu Hao1, Dehui Zou1, Yaozhong Zhao1, Lugui Qiu1, Gang An1,2,3.   

Abstract

Chromosome 1q21 aberrations in multiple myeloma have attracted much attention for a long time, however, the prognostic value is still under investigation. We confirmed the independent prognostic impact of 1q21 aberrations in this non-randomized clinical study. Our study noted that additional copies and larger clonal size of 1q21 gain did not worsen the outcome. We discovered that 1q21 gain was associated with the acquisition of new chromosome abnormalities and genomic instability, evidenced by the strong correlation between 1q21 gain and complex karyotypes or the acquisition of more than two cytogenetic aberrations. Moreover, 1q21 gain and/or del(17p) were powerful enough to discriminate high-risk patients. Furthermore, 1q21 gain retained unfavorable even when stratified by concurrent presence of t(4;14), especially in the bortezomib arm. Finally, although bortezomib might benefit patients with 1q21 gain, it could not completely overcome its adverse effects, suggesting the necessity of more effective therapies for these patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bortezomib; Chromosome 1; Multiple myeloma; Outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31842644     DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1700503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma        ISSN: 1026-8022


  7 in total

1.  Outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma harboring chromosome 1q gain/amplification in the era of modern therapy.

Authors:  Xiao Hu; Cherng-Horng Wu; Janet M Cowan; Raymond L Comenzo; Cindy Varga
Journal:  Ann Hematol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 3.673

2.  Amp 1q21 is more predictable with dismal survival than gain 1q21 of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-world analysis.

Authors:  Yu-Tong Wang; Li Bao; Bin Chu; Xiao-Huan Chen; Min-Qiu Lu; Lei Shi; Shan Gao; Li-Juan Fang; Qiu-Qing Xiang; Yue-Hua Ding
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2022-03-30       Impact factor: 3.124

Review 3.  Risk factors in multiple myeloma: is it time for a revision?

Authors:  Jill Corre; Nikhil C Munshi; Hervé Avet-Loiseau
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 25.476

Review 4.  Risk and Response-Adapted Treatment in Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Titouan Cazaubiel; Olga Mulas; Lydia Montes; Anaïs Schavgoulidze; Hervé Avet-Loiseau; Jill Corre; Aurore Perrot
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 6.639

5.  Clonal phylogeny and evolution of critical cytogenetic aberrations in multiple myeloma at single-cell level by QM-FISH.

Authors:  Yuting Yan; Xiaoqi Qin; Jiahui Liu; Huishou Fan; Wenqiang Yan; Lanting Liu; Chenxing Du; Zhen Yu; Yan Xu; Mu Hao; Shuhui Deng; Weiwei Sui; Rui Lyu; Wei Liu; Qi Wang; Dehui Zou; Linping Hu; Jianxiang Wang; Yu-Tzu Tai; Kenneth C Anderson; Lei Zhang; Tao Cheng; Anders Zetterberg; Nikhil C Munshi; Lugui Qiu; Gang An
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2022-01-25

6.  The impact of bortezomib-based induction in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma with chromosome 1q21 gain.

Authors:  Hoi Ki Karen Tang; Chi Yeung Fung; Gareth J Morgan; Shaji Kumar; Lisa Siu; Ho Wan Alvin Ip; Sze Fai Yip; Ka Ngai Harry Lau; Chi Kuen Lau; Harold Lee; Kwan Hung Leung; Bonnie Kho; Howard Wong; Cheong Ngai; Yu Yan Hwang; Joycelyn Sim; Yok Lam Kwong; Chor Sang Chim
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2022-04-18

7.  [Influence of the number of high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities on the clinical characteristics and prognosis in 360 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma].

Authors:  Z Chen; Y Xia; R Guo; R Zhang; H R Qiu; Y Y Jin; J Y Li; L J Chen
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2022-05-14
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.