Literature DB >> 31841674

Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems.

Sock Hoon Tan1, Tat Ming Ng2, Ka Lip Chew3, Joy Yong3, Jia En Wu3, Min Yi Yap2, Shi Thong Heng2, Wendy Hui Wen Ng3, Shilin Wan2, Sean Jia Hui Cheok4, Paul Anantharajah Tambyah5, David Chien Lye6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: AmpC β-lactamases are found in Enterobacter species, Serratia species, Citrobacter freundii, Providencia species and Morganella morganii ('ESCPM'). Carbapenems are commonly used to treat severe 'ESCPM' infections. Carbapenem-sparing agents are needed because of increasing carbapenem resistance worldwide. Use of cefepime and piperacillin-tazobactam has limited supportive clinical data. We evaluated the efficacy of non-carbapenems vs. carbapenems in 'ESCPM' bacteraemia.
METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with 'ESCPM' bacteraemia. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Analyses were performed on patients who received carbapenems vs. piperacillin-tazobactam or cefepime monotherapy as empirical and definitive therapy. Propensity score for carbapenem therapy was adjusted for in multivariate analyses for 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: A total of 241 patients were included. The most common bacterium isolated was Enterobacter species (58.1%). Common sources were urinary (22.8%) and vascular lines (22.0%). Carbapenems (28.6%) and piperacillin-tazobactam (28.6%) were the commonest empirical antibiotics. Carbapenems (54.8%) and cefepime (23.7%) were the most common definitive antibiotics. Median Pitt bacteraemia score was 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 0-2). Overall, 30-day mortality was 12.9%. Adjusted multivariate analyses for empirical and definitive antibiotic treatment models yielded risk factors for 30-day mortality, including higher Pitt bacteraemia score (empirical: adjusted OR [aOR] 1.21 for each point increase, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.45; definitive: aOR 1.33 for each point increase, 95% CI:1.06-1.69) and age (empirical: aOR 1.04 for each year increase, 95% CI:1.01-1.08). Empirical piperacillin-tazobactam (aOR 0.29, 95% CI:0.07-1.27) and definitive cefepime (aOR 0.65, 95% CI:0.12-3.55) were not associated with 30-day mortality.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with carbapenem therapy, empirical piperacillin-tazobactam and definitive cefepime were not associated with 30-day mortality in 'ESCPM' bacteraemia.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. and International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AmpC; Carbapenem; Cefepime; Piperacillin-tazobactam

Year:  2019        PMID: 31841674     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105860

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents        ISSN: 0924-8579            Impact factor:   5.283


  4 in total

1.  Risk Factors of Death in Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales in Patients with Neoplasia.

Authors:  Tiago da Cunha Ferreira; Ianick Souto Martins
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2021-08-11       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 2.  Is Piperacillin-Tazobactam an Appropriate Empirical Agent for Hospital-Acquired Sepsis and Community-Acquired Septic Shock of Unknown Origin in Australia?

Authors:  Alice Gage-Brown; Catherine George; Jenna Maleki; Kasha P Singh; Stephen Muhi
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-05

3.  Meropenem Versus Piperacillin-Tazobactam for Definitive Treatment of Bloodstream Infections Caused by AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacter spp, Citrobacter freundii, Morganella morganii, Providencia spp, or Serratia marcescens: A Pilot Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (MERINO-2).

Authors:  Adam G Stewart; David L Paterson; Barnaby Young; David C Lye; Joshua S Davis; Kellie Schneider; Mesut Yilmaz; Rumeysa Dinleyici; Naomi Runnegar; Andrew Henderson; Sophia Archuleta; Shirin Kalimuddin; Brian M Forde; Mark D Chatfield; Michelle J Bauer; Jeffrey Lipman; Tiffany Harris-Brown; Patrick N A Harris
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 3.835

4.  Performance of the eazyplex® BloodScreen GN as a simple and rapid molecular test for identification of Gram-negative bacteria from positive blood cultures.

Authors:  Katharina Bach; Birgit Edel; Steffen Höring; Lucie Bartoničkova; Stefan Glöckner; Bettina Löffler; Christina Bahrs; Jürgen Rödel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 3.267

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.