Literature DB >> 31841500

Retraction: Response to: "Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state".

.   

Abstract

Year:  2019        PMID: 31841500      PMCID: PMC6913910          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Biol        ISSN: 1544-9173            Impact factor:   8.029


× No keyword cloud information.
The editors retract this publication following two investigations into concerns originally brought to the attention to the authors’ institution by a whistleblower. The results of such investigations can be found at the following links: Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft During their investigation, committees at both institutions concluded that the authors of the study are at fault with regard to data collection, handling, and analysis. However, they did not comment on the methodology underlying the findings. Adhering to the guidelines provided by the Committee on Publication Ethics, the editors retract this manuscript because the authors were found to have engaged in scientific misconduct by Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft. The authors have declined to sign this retraction, as they stand by their data, analyses, and conclusions, and state that they intend to take legal proceedings to challenge the findings in the reports, which they claim contain errors.
  1 in total

1.  Response to: "Questioning the evidence for BCI-based communication in the complete locked-in state".

Authors:  Ujwal Chaudhary; Sudhir Pathak; Niels Birbaumer
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 8.029

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.