Literature DB >> 31840852

Osteophyte volume calculation using dissimilarity-excluding Procrustes registration of archived bone models from healthy volunteers.

Amy M Morton1, Bardiya Akhbari2, Douglas C Moore1, Joseph J Crisco1,2.   

Abstract

Osteophytes are associated with later stage osteoarthritis and are most commonly described using semiquantitative radiographic grading systems. A detailed understanding of osteophyte formation is, in part, limited by the ability to quantify bone pathology. Osteophytes can be quantified relative to pre-osteoarthritic bone, or to the contralateral bone if it is healthy; however, in many cases, neither are available as references. We present a method for computing three-dimensional (3D) osteophyte models using a library of healthy control bones. An existing data set containing the computed tomography scans of 90 patients with first carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (OA) and 46 healthy subjects were utilized. A healthy bone that best fit each OA subject's bone was determined using a dissimilarity-excluding Procrustes registration technique (DEP) that minimized the influence of dissimilar features (ie, osteophytes). The osteophyte model was then computed through Boolean subtraction of the reference bone model from the OA bone model. DEP reference bones conformed significantly better to the OA bones (P < .0001) than by finite difference iterative closest point registration (root mean squared distances, 0.33 ± 0.05 and 0.41 ± 0.16 mm, respectively). The effect of library size on dissimilarity measure was investigated by leave-k-out cross-validation randomly reducing k from 46 to 1. A library of n ≥ 31 resulted in less than 10% difference from the theoretical minimum value. The proposed method enables quantification of osteophytes when the disease-free bone or the healthy contralateral bone is not available for any 3D data set. Quantifying osteophyte formation and growth may aid in understating the associated mechanisms in OA.
© 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carpometacarpal; morphology; osteophyte; registration; superimposition

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31840852      PMCID: PMC7225059          DOI: 10.1002/jor.24569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  40 in total

1.  An algorithmic overview of surface registration techniques for medical imaging.

Authors:  M A Audette; F P Ferrie; T M Peters
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  A digital database of wrist bone anatomy and carpal kinematics.

Authors:  Douglas C Moore; Joseph J Crisco; Theodore G Trafton; Evan L Leventhal
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-02-05       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 3.  Quantification and variation in experimental studies of morphogenesis.

Authors:  W James Cooper; R Craig Albertson
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Hand Osteoarthritis: Intraobserver Reliability and Criterion Validity for Clinical and Structural Characteristics.

Authors:  Marion C Kortekaas; Wing-Yee Kwok; Monique Reijnierse; Ron Wolterbeek; Pernille Bøyesen; Desiree van der Heijde; Johannes L Bloem; Margreet Kloppenburg
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2015-05-15       Impact factor: 4.666

5.  The morphology of the thumb carpometacarpal joint does not differ between men and women, but changes with aging and early osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Eni Halilaj; Douglas C Moore; David H Laidlaw; Christopher J Got; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Amy L Ladd; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Atlas of individual radiographic features in osteoarthritis, revised.

Authors:  R D Altman; G E Gold
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 6.576

7.  Osteophytes in the osteoarthritic hand: their incidence, size, distribution, and progression.

Authors:  J C Buckland-Wright; D G Macfarlane; J A Lynch
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 19.103

8.  High-resolution MRI and micro-CT in an ex vivo rabbit anterior cruciate ligament transection model of osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Danika L Batiste; Alexandra Kirkley; Sheila Laverty; Lisa M F Thain; Alison R Spouge; Joseph S Gati; Paula J Foster; David W Holdsworth
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 6.576

9.  Kinematic changes in elbow osteoarthritis: in vivo and 3-dimensional analysis using computed tomographic data.

Authors:  Junichi Miyake; Kozo Shimada; Hisao Moritomo; Toshiyuki Kataoka; Tsuyoshi Murase; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 2.230

Review 10.  Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: insight into risk factors and microstructural changes.

Authors:  Guangyi Li; Jimin Yin; Junjie Gao; Tak S Cheng; Nathan J Pavlos; Changqing Zhang; Ming H Zheng
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 5.156

View more
  3 in total

1.  Proximal-distal shift of the center of rotation in a total wrist arthroplasty is more than twice of the healthy wrist.

Authors:  Bardiya Akhbari; Amy M Morton; Kalpit N Shah; Janine Molino; Douglas C Moore; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Scott W Wolfe; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2020-05-25       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Evaluation of the PROMIS Upper Extremity Against Validated Patient-Reported Outcomes in Patients With Early Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Edgar Garcia-Lopez; Douglas C Moore; Deborah E Kenney; Amy L Ladd; Arnold-Peter C Weiss; Joseph J Crisco
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 2.342

3.  Predicting robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty operating time : benefits of machine-learning and 3D patient-specific data.

Authors:  Arman Motesharei; Cecile Batailler; Daniele De Massari; Graham Vincent; Antonia F Chen; Sébastien Lustig
Journal:  Bone Jt Open       Date:  2022-05
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.