| Literature DB >> 31840658 |
Anton Albajes-Eizagirre1, Aleix Solanes2, Miquel Angel Fullana3, John P A Ioannidis4, Paolo Fusar-Poli5, Carla Torrent6, Brisa Solé6, Caterina Mar Bonnín6, Eduard Vieta6, David Mataix-Cols7, Joaquim Radua8.
Abstract
Most methods for conducting meta-analysis of voxel-based neuroimaging studies do not assess whether effects are not null, but whether there is a convergence of peaks of statistical significance, and reduce the assessment of the evidence to a binary classification exclusively based on p-values (i.e., voxels can only be "statistically significant" or "non-statistically significant"). Here, we detail how to conduct a meta-analysis using Seed-based d Mapping with Permutation of Subject Images (SDM-PSI), a novel method that uses a standard permutation test to assess whether effects are not null. We also show how to grade the strength of the evidence according to a set of criteria that considers a range of statistical significance levels (from more liberal to more conservative), the amount of data or the detection of potential biases (e.g., small-study effect and excess of significance). To exemplify the procedure, we detail the conduction of a meta-analysis of voxel-based morphometry studies in obsessive-compulsive disorder, and we provide all the data already extracted from the manuscripts to allow the reader to replicate the meta-analysis easily. SDM-PSI can also be used for meta-analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, position emission tomography and surface-based morphometry studies.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31840658 DOI: 10.3791/59841
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Vis Exp ISSN: 1940-087X Impact factor: 1.355