Literature DB >> 31840578

Linguistic generalization and compositionality in modern artificial neural networks.

Marco Baroni1,2,3.   

Abstract

In the last decade, deep artificial neural networks have achieved astounding performance in many natural language-processing tasks. Given the high productivity of language, these models must possess effective generalization abilities. It is widely assumed that humans handle linguistic productivity by means of algebraic compositional rules: are deep networks similarly compositional? After reviewing the main innovations characterizing current deep language-processing networks, I discuss a set of studies suggesting that deep networks are capable of subtle grammar-dependent generalizations, but also that they do not rely on systematic compositional rules. I argue that the intriguing behaviour of these devices (still awaiting a full understanding) should be of interest to linguists and cognitive scientists, as it offers a new perspective on possible computational strategies to deal with linguistic productivity beyond rule-based compositionality, and it might lead to new insights into the less systematic generalization patterns that also appear in natural language. This article is part of the theme issue 'Towards mechanistic models of meaning composition'.

Entities:  

Keywords:  artificial neural networks; compositionality; deep learning; linguistic productivity

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31840578      PMCID: PMC6939347          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0307

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  15 in total

1.  The past and future of the past tense.

Authors:  Steven Pinker; Michael T. Ullman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  An integrated theory of language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Martin J Pickering; Simon Garrod
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 12.579

Review 3.  Rethinking eliminative connectionism.

Authors:  G F Marcus
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Long short-term memory.

Authors:  S Hochreiter; J Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 2.026

5.  Affixation in semantic space: Modeling morpheme meanings with compositional distributional semantics.

Authors:  Marco Marelli; Marco Baroni
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 6.  Deep learning.

Authors:  Yann LeCun; Yoshua Bengio; Geoffrey Hinton
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-05-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis.

Authors:  J A Fodor; Z W Pylyshyn
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1988-03

8.  Phase synchronization varies systematically with linguistic structure composition.

Authors:  Jonathan R Brennan; Andrea E Martin
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Building machines that learn and think like people.

Authors:  Brenden M Lake; Tomer D Ullman; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Samuel J Gershman
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2016-11-24       Impact factor: 12.579

10.  Compositionality in animals and humans.

Authors:  Simon W Townsend; Sabrina Engesser; Sabine Stoll; Klaus Zuberbühler; Balthasar Bickel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Direct Fit to Nature: An Evolutionary Perspective on Biological and Artificial Neural Networks.

Authors:  Uri Hasson; Samuel A Nastase; Ariel Goldstein
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Modelling meaning composition from formalism to mechanism.

Authors:  Andrea E Martin; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Quasi-compositional mapping from form to meaning: a neural network-based approach to capturing neural responses during human language comprehension.

Authors:  Milena Rabovsky; James L McClelland
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Theory Before the Test: How to Build High-Verisimilitude Explanatory Theories in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Iris van Rooij; Giosuè Baggio
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-06

5.  Deep Learnability: Using Neural Networks to Quantify Language Similarity and Learnability.

Authors:  Clara Cohen; Catherine F Higham; Syed Waqar Nabi
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-06-24

6.  The "Narratives" fMRI dataset for evaluating models of naturalistic language comprehension.

Authors:  Samuel A Nastase; Yun-Fei Liu; Hanna Hillman; Asieh Zadbood; Liat Hasenfratz; Neggin Keshavarzian; Janice Chen; Christopher J Honey; Yaara Yeshurun; Mor Regev; Mai Nguyen; Claire H C Chang; Christopher Baldassano; Olga Lositsky; Erez Simony; Michael A Chow; Yuan Chang Leong; Paula P Brooks; Emily Micciche; Gina Choe; Ariel Goldstein; Tamara Vanderwal; Yaroslav O Halchenko; Kenneth A Norman; Uri Hasson
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 8.501

Review 7.  Can Recurrent Neural Networks Validate Usage-Based Theories of Grammar Acquisition?

Authors:  Ludovica Pannitto; Aurelie Herbelot
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-03-23

8.  A Computational Neural Network Model for College English Grammar Correction.

Authors:  Xingjie Wu
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-09-05

9.  The Challenge of Modeling the Acquisition of Mathematical Concepts.

Authors:  Alberto Testolin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Disentangling Semantic Composition and Semantic Association in the Left Temporal Lobe.

Authors:  Jixing Li; Liina Pylkkänen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.