Rachel Feuerstein-Simon1, Roxanne Dupuis2, Ryan Schumacher3, Carolyn C Cannuscio4. 1. Center for Public Health Initiatives, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA. 3. Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 4. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aimed to increase the consumption of home-cooked meals among employees at a large urban worksite through a fully subsidized Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) program. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING:Worksite in a large northeast city. PARTICIPANTS: Employees were recruited through flyers, e-mail listservs, and outreach from departmental administrators (n = 60). INTERVENTION: Intervention participants received 8 biweekly fresh food deliveries through a CSA program. They also received cooking education and support. Control participants received usual employee benefits. MEASURES: Consumption of meals prepared at home was the primary end point. Increased consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables was the secondary end point, and food insecurity was an exploratory end point. ANALYSIS: Poisson regression was used to assess mean differences in weekly consumption of home-cooked meals. To assess differences in fruit and vegetable consumption and food insecurity, binary logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, intervention participants consumed 29% more home-cooked meals per week (P < .01). Fruit and vegetable consumption also increased among intervention participants. The odds of at least twice-daily fruit consumption were 3.8 times higher among intervention participants than among controls, and the odds of at least twice-daily vegetable consumption were 6.2 times higher among intervention participants than among controls. Compared to control participants, intervention participants experienced a statistically significant 89% reduction in the odds of reporting food insecurity at follow-up, when controlling for baseline food insecurity. Participants reported perceived intervention benefits, including the opportunity to experiment with new, healthful foods without financial risk, as well as the social value of sharing recipes, food, and related conversation with colleagues. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the feasibility and potential positive effects of a subsidized workplace CSA program, augmented with cooking education and support.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: This study aimed to increase the consumption of home-cooked meals among employees at a large urban worksite through a fully subsidized Community Supported Agriculture (CSA) program. DESIGN: Randomized trial. SETTING: Worksite in a large northeast city. PARTICIPANTS: Employees were recruited through flyers, e-mail listservs, and outreach from departmental administrators (n = 60). INTERVENTION: Intervention participants received 8 biweekly fresh food deliveries through a CSA program. They also received cooking education and support. Control participants received usual employee benefits. MEASURES: Consumption of meals prepared at home was the primary end point. Increased consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables was the secondary end point, and food insecurity was an exploratory end point. ANALYSIS: Poisson regression was used to assess mean differences in weekly consumption of home-cooked meals. To assess differences in fruit and vegetable consumption and food insecurity, binary logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios. RESULTS: Compared to the control group, intervention participants consumed 29% more home-cooked meals per week (P < .01). Fruit and vegetable consumption also increased among intervention participants. The odds of at least twice-daily fruit consumption were 3.8 times higher among intervention participants than among controls, and the odds of at least twice-daily vegetable consumption were 6.2 times higher among intervention participants than among controls. Compared to control participants, intervention participants experienced a statistically significant 89% reduction in the odds of reporting food insecurity at follow-up, when controlling for baseline food insecurity. Participants reported perceived intervention benefits, including the opportunity to experiment with new, healthful foods without financial risk, as well as the social value of sharing recipes, food, and related conversation with colleagues. CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated the feasibility and potential positive effects of a subsidized workplace CSA program, augmented with cooking education and support.
Entities:
Keywords:
health disparities; health policy; nutrition; worksite interventions
Authors: Carlos Irwin A Oronce; Isomi M Miake-Lye; Meron M Begashaw; Marika Booth; William H Shrank; Paul G Shekelle Journal: JAMA Health Forum Date: 2021-08-06
Authors: Rienna G Russo; Yan Li; Lan N Ðoàn; Shahmir H Ali; David Siscovick; Simona C Kwon; Stella S Yi Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 6.106