Literature DB >> 31840405

House fly resistance to chlorantraniliprole: cross resistance patterns, stability and associated fitness costs.

Rizwan Mustafa Shah1, Sarfraz Ali Shad1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The house fly, Musca domestica L. (Diptera: Muscidae) is an important public health pest that serves as a carrier for pathogens transmitting various diseases of man and animals. It is well known for rapid resistance development to insecticides applied for its chemical control. Chlorantraniliprole, an anthranilic diamide, a ryanodine receptor agonist, is a promising agent for the integrated pest management of various insect pests. To design a retrospective resistance management strategy, life history traits of the chlorantraniliprole laboratory-selected (CTPR-SEL) and unselected counterpart (UNSEL) sub-populations of a field strain and their reciprocal crosses were studied.
RESULTS: After eight generations of consecutive selection with chlorantraniliprole, a 750-fold resistance level when compared to a susceptible strain and a 124-fold resistance level when compared to the UNSEL strain had developed in CTPR-SEL. Very low cross resistance to bifenthrin but no cross resistance to spinosad and fipronil was observed in the CTPR-SEL strain. Results of the fitness traits suggest that the CTPR-SEL has a lower relative fitness (0.34), reduced fecundity, a decrease in eggs hatchability, lower biotic potential and net reproductive rate as compared to the UNSEL strain. Interestingly, chlorantraniliprole resistance was unstable in the CTPR-SEL.
CONCLUSIONS: Fitness costs associated with chlorantraniliprole resistance suggest that the efficacy of this insecticide could be preserved for a prolonged duration of time by alternating its use with insecticides having dissimilar modes of action and no cross resistance. When cross-resistance is absent, a sequence of two insecticides is expected to be more durable than a mixture unless the population's h2 of resistance to the mixture is less than half of the mean of the population's h2 of resistance to the two individual components of the mixture. Unstable chlorantraniliprole resistance could also help to sustain its efficacy by being withdrawn from usage for some period of time.
© 2019 Society of Chemical Industry. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biotic potential; cross resistance; fitness cost; insecticide resistance; relative fitness

Year:  2019        PMID: 31840405     DOI: 10.1002/ps.5716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pest Manag Sci        ISSN: 1526-498X            Impact factor:   4.845


  4 in total

1.  Risk assessment of resistance to diflubenzuron in Musca domestica: Realized heritability and cross-resistance to fourteen insecticides from different classes.

Authors:  Abdulwahab M Hafez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Toxicity of fluralaner, a companion animal insecticide, relative to industry-leading agricultural insecticides against resistant and susceptible strains of filth flies.

Authors:  Edwin R Burgess; Christopher J Geden; Kimberly H Lohmeyer; B H King; Erika T Machtinger; Jeffrey G Scott
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Extraction and determination of flubendiamide insecticide in food samples: A review.

Authors:  S Aghris; O Tahiri Alaoui; F Laghrib; A Farahi; M Bakasse; S Saqrane; S Lahrich; M A El Mhammedi
Journal:  Curr Res Food Sci       Date:  2022-02-14

4.  Insecticide resistance to insect growth regulators, avermectins, spinosyns and diamides in Culex quinquefasciatus in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulwahab M Hafez; Naeem Abbas
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 3.876

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.