Lara N Coughlin1, Maureen A Walton1,2, Richard McCormick3, Frederic C Blow1,4. 1. Addiction Center, Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 2. Injury Prevention Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 3. Center for Healthcare Research and Policy, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio. 4. Department of Veteran Affairs Healthcare System, VA Center for Clinical Management Research (CCMR), Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The National Guard provides critical support both domestically and abroad with soldiers dispersed throughout America and spanning the urban-rural continuum. To determine if location-specific interventions may be needed, we compared the prevalence and severity of cannabis and alcohol use among National Guard members across localities. METHODS: Michigan National Guard members were enrolled (N = 2,746) during drill weekends as part of a larger randomized behavioral trial. Cannabis (ASSIST; prevalence = 5%) and alcohol use (AUDIT; prevalence = 82%) were compared using hurdle regression models across locality status after adjusting for covariates. FINDINGS: Prevalence of cannabis and alcohol use was predicted by locality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.838-0.986, P = .029; AOR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.929-0.998, P = .038, respectively), with more use in urban localities. Neither severity of cannabis nor alcohol use was predicted by locality status. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of cannabis and alcohol use in the National Guard is differentially elevated across localities with higher prevalence in more central, densely populated areas. Findings may inform future work considering accessibility and utilization of prevention and treatment services for Guard members across the urban-rural continuum.
PURPOSE: The National Guard provides critical support both domestically and abroad with soldiers dispersed throughout America and spanning the urban-rural continuum. To determine if location-specific interventions may be needed, we compared the prevalence and severity of cannabis and alcohol use among National Guard members across localities. METHODS: Michigan National Guard members were enrolled (N = 2,746) during drill weekends as part of a larger randomized behavioral trial. Cannabis (ASSIST; prevalence = 5%) and alcohol use (AUDIT; prevalence = 82%) were compared using hurdle regression models across locality status after adjusting for covariates. FINDINGS: Prevalence of cannabis and alcohol use was predicted by locality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.913, 95% CI: 0.838-0.986, P = .029; AOR = 0.963, 95% CI: 0.929-0.998, P = .038, respectively), with more use in urban localities. Neither severity of cannabis nor alcohol use was predicted by locality status. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of cannabis and alcohol use in the National Guard is differentially elevated across localities with higher prevalence in more central, densely populated areas. Findings may inform future work considering accessibility and utilization of prevention and treatment services for Guard members across the urban-rural continuum.
Authors: Robert M Bray; Michael R Pemberton; Marian E Lane; Laurel L Hourani; Mark J Mattiko; Lorraine A Babeu Journal: Mil Med Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 1.437
Authors: Amanda G Ferrier-Auerbach; Shannon M Kehle; Christopher R Erbes; Paul A Arbisi; Paul Thuras; Melissa A Polusny Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Adrian Blow; Maryhelen D MacInnes; Jessica Hamel; Barbara Ames; Esther Onaga; Kendal Holtrop; Lisa Gorman; Sheila Smith Journal: Adm Policy Ment Health Date: 2012-09
Authors: Brandon D L Marshall; Marta R Prescott; Israel Liberzon; Marijo B Tamburrino; Joseph R Calabrese; Sandro Galea Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2012-02-17 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Isabel G Jacobson; Margaret A K Ryan; Tomoko I Hooper; Tyler C Smith; Paul J Amoroso; Edward J Boyko; Gary D Gackstetter; Timothy S Wells; Nicole S Bell Journal: JAMA Date: 2008-08-13 Impact factor: 56.272