Grace Kong1, Patricia Simon1, Margaret E Mayer2, Jessica L Barrington-Trimis3, Lauren R Pacek4, Maria Cooper5, Mignonne C Guy6, Cassandra A Stanton7. 1. Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT. 2. Yale School of Public Health, Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, New Haven, CT. 3. University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA. 4. Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Durham, NC. 5. Adjunct Faculty, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health Austin Campus, Houston, TX. 6. Virginia Commonwealth University College of Humanities and Sciences, Department of African American Studies, Richmond, VA. 7. Westat, Center for Evaluation and Coordination of Training and Research (CECTR) in Tobacco Regulatory Science, Washington, DC.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we identified groups of adolescents who share similar awareness and perceptions of harm regarding e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco. METHODS: We used latent class analyses (LCA) with the data from Wave 1 (2013-14) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health youth and parent survey (PATH; N = 13,650) to address the research goal. Multinomial logistic regression analysis assessed the associations between identified classes with demographic characteristics and tobacco use. RESULTS: LCA identified 5 classes: (1) perceived harm across all alternative tobacco products (36.6%); (2) perceived harm for e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco but never heard of cigars and hookah (48.2%); (3) never heard of alternative tobacco products (8.6%); (4) mix of no harm and harm across alternative tobacco products (5.2%); and (5) "don't know" the harm across alternative tobacco products (1.4%). Relative to the class who perceived harm across all alternative tobacco products, classes of adolescents who were unaware of the products or did not know the harms were more likely to be non-white, younger, have lower parental education, and less likely to have tried an alternative tobacco product. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco prevention should target vulnerable youth, such as adolescents who are non-white, young, and have low parental education.
OBJECTIVES: In this study, we identified groups of adolescents who share similar awareness and perceptions of harm regarding e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco. METHODS: We used latent class analyses (LCA) with the data from Wave 1 (2013-14) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health youth and parent survey (PATH; N = 13,650) to address the research goal. Multinomial logistic regression analysis assessed the associations between identified classes with demographic characteristics and tobacco use. RESULTS: LCA identified 5 classes: (1) perceived harm across all alternative tobacco products (36.6%); (2) perceived harm for e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco but never heard of cigars and hookah (48.2%); (3) never heard of alternative tobacco products (8.6%); (4) mix of no harm and harm across alternative tobacco products (5.2%); and (5) "don't know" the harm across alternative tobacco products (1.4%). Relative to the class who perceived harm across all alternative tobacco products, classes of adolescents who were unaware of the products or did not know the harms were more likely to be non-white, younger, have lower parental education, and less likely to have tried an alternative tobacco product. CONCLUSIONS: Tobacco prevention should target vulnerable youth, such as adolescents who are non-white, young, and have low parental education.
Entities:
Keywords:
adolescents; harm perceptions; latent class analysis; tobacco
Authors: Jennifer Cantrell; Jennifer M Kreslake; Ollie Ganz; Jennifer L Pearson; Donna Vallone; Andrew Anesetti-Rothermel; Haijun Xiao; Thomas R Kirchner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2013-08-15 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Grace Kong; Deepa R Camenga; Dana A Cavallo; Patricia Simon; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Paul T Harrell; Syeda Mahrukh Hussnain Naqvi; Andrew D Plunk; Ming Ji; Silvia S Martins Journal: Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse Date: 2016-09-26 Impact factor: 3.829
Authors: Anna V Song; Holly E R Morrell; Jodi L Cornell; Malena E Ramos; Michael Biehl; Rhonda Y Kropp; Bonnie L Halpern-Felsher Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-12-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Kimberly G Wagoner; Jennifer Cornacchione; Kimberly D Wiseman; Randall Teal; Kathryn E Moracco; Erin L Sutfin Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2016-03-30 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Ahmed Jamal; Andrea Gentzke; S Sean Hu; Karen A Cullen; Benjamin J Apelberg; David M Homa; Brian A King Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2017-06-16 Impact factor: 17.586