Literature DB >> 31839962

Intra-procedural and delayed bleeding after resection of large colorectal lesions: The SCALP study.

Arnaldo Amato1, Franco Radaelli1, Loredana Correale2, Emilio Di Giulio3, Andrea Buda4, Vincenzo Cennamo5, Lorenzo Fuccio6, Massimo Devani7, Ottaviano Tarantino8, Giancarla Fiori9, Germana De Nucci10, Mario De Bellis11, Cesare Hassan2, Alessandro Repici12.   

Abstract

Background and aim: The safety of endoscopic resection of large colorectal lesions (LCLs) (≥20 mm) is clinically relevant. The aim of the present study was to assess the rate of post-resection adverse events (AEs) in a real-life setting. Patients and methods: In a prospective, multicentre, observational study, data from consecutive resections of LCLs over a 6-month period were collected in 24 centres. Patients were followed up at 15 days from resection for AEs. The primary endpoint was intra-procedural bleeding according to lesion morphology. Secondary endpoints were delayed bleeding and perforation. Patient and polyp characteristics, and polypectomy techniques were analysed with respect to the bleeding events.
Results: In total, 1504 patients (female/male: 633/871, mean age, 66.1) with 1648 LCLs (29.1% pedunculated and 70.9% non-pedunculated lesions) were included. Overall, 168 (11.2%) patients had post-resection bleeding (8.5 and 2.0% immediate and delayed, respectively), while 15 (1.0%) cases of perforation occurred. Independent predictors of immediate bleeding for pedunculated lesions were bleeding prophylaxis (odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.13-0.62), simple polypectomy (versus endoscopic mucosal resection, OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17-0.88) and inpatient setting (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.07-5.08), while bleeding prophylaxis (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.30-0.98), academic setting (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.12-0.54) and size (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05) were predictors for those non-pedunculated. Indication for colonoscopy (screening versus diagnostic (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.86)), antithrombotic therapy (OR 3.12, 95% CI 1.54-6.39) and size (OR 2.34, 95% CI 1.12-4.87) independently predicted delayed bleeding. Conclusions: A low rate of post-resection AEs was observed in a real-life setting, reassuring as to the safety of endoscopic resection of ≥2 cm colorectal lesions. Bleeding prophylaxis reduced the intra-procedural bleeding risk, while antithrombotic therapy increased delayed bleeding.CLINICALTRIAL: (NCT02694120). © Author(s) 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Large colorectal lesions; endoscopic resection; polypectomy; post-resection bleeding

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31839962      PMCID: PMC6893999          DOI: 10.1177/2050640619874176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J        ISSN: 2050-6406            Impact factor:   4.623


  32 in total

1.  A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data.

Authors:  R L Williams
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large sessile colon polyps.

Authors:  Farzan F Bahin; Mahendra Naidoo; Stephen J Williams; Luke F Hourigan; Donald G Ormonde; Spiro C Raftopoulos; Bronte A Holt; Rebecca Sonson; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 11.382

4.  Increasing Rates of Surgery for Patients With Nonmalignant Colorectal Polyps in the United States.

Authors:  Anne F Peery; Katherine S Cools; Paula D Strassle; Sarah K McGill; Seth D Crockett; Aubrey Barker; Mark Koruda; Ian S Grimm
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-01-06       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Risk assessment for delayed hemorrhagic complication of colonic polypectomy: polyp-related factors and patient-related factors.

Authors:  Hirotsugu Watabe; Yutaka Yamaji; Makoto Okamoto; Shintaro Kondo; Miki Ohta; Tsuneo Ikenoue; Jun Kato; Goichi Togo; Masayuki Matsumura; Haruhiko Yoshida; Takao Kawabe; Masao Omata
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 9.427

6.  Long-term adenoma recurrence following wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection (WF-EMR) for advanced colonic mucosal neoplasia is infrequent: results and risk factors in 1000 cases from the Australian Colonic EMR (ACE) study.

Authors:  Alan Moss; Stephen J Williams; Luke F Hourigan; Gregor Brown; William Tam; Rajvinder Singh; Simon Zanati; Nicholas G Burgess; Rebecca Sonson; Karen Byth; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Risk factors for intraprocedural and clinically significant delayed bleeding after wide-field endoscopic mucosal resection of large colonic lesions.

Authors:  Nicholas G Burgess; Andrew J Metz; Stephen J Williams; Rajvinder Singh; William Tam; Luke F Hourigan; Simon A Zanati; Gregor J Brown; Rebecca Sonson; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

8.  Prevalence of flat lesions in a large screening population and their role in colonoscopy quality improvement.

Authors:  K Reinhart; C Bannert; D Dunkler; P Salzl; M Trauner; F Renner; P Knoflach; A Ferlitsch; W Weiss; M Ferlitsch
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Cost Analysis of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Surgery for Large Laterally Spreading Colorectal Lesions.

Authors:  Mahesh Jayanna; Nicholas G Burgess; Rajvinder Singh; Luke F Hourigan; Gregor J Brown; Simon A Zanati; Alan Moss; James Lim; Rebecca Sonson; Stephen J Williams; Michael J Bourke
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-11       Impact factor: 11.382

Review 10.  Effect of screening sigmoidoscopy and screening colonoscopy on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and observational studies.

Authors:  Hermann Brenner; Christian Stock; Michael Hoffmeister
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-04-09
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Anticoagulation and antiplatelet management in gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review of current evidence.

Authors:  Andrew Chan; Hamish Philpott; Amanda H Lim; Minnie Au; Derrick Tee; Damian Harding; Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha; Biju George; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-11-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.