Literature DB >> 31839334

Rapid microbial identification and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing directly from positive blood cultures: a new platform compared to routine laboratory methods.

Adriana Calderaro1, Mirko Buttrini2, Monica Martinelli2, Silvia Covan2, Sara Montecchini2, Alberto Ruggeri2, Maria Cristina Arcangeletti2, Flora De Conto2, Carlo Chezzi2.   

Abstract

The Accelerate Pheno™ System (APS), a new platform that combines rapid identification (ID) of bacteria and yeasts and phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) in a single assay, has been evaluated directly from positive blood cultures in comparison to routine laboratory methods. The APS ID results showed an overall sensitivity and specificity of 92.6% and 99.6%, respectively. With regard to AST results, 31 discrepancies (8 single errors and 23 combined errors) were observed, including 13 major errors (3.3%) and 18 minor errors (4.6%) mainly involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa. No very major error was observed. The APS ID results were obtained in 1.5 h and the AST results were available in 7 h, on average 34.1 h before routine laboratory methods. This reduction in AST time-to-result represents one of the main advantages of this technology, reducing the time to provide to the physician the microbiological report.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial therapy; Blood culture; Phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Rapid identification

Year:  2019        PMID: 31839334     DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2019.114955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.803


  2 in total

1.  Performance of Antipseudomonal β-Lactams on the Accelerate PhenoTest BC Kit against a Collection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates.

Authors:  Aaron Sikorski; Alena Shamsheyeva; Dulini Gamage; Niels Oppermann; Amira A Bhalodi; Romney M Humphries
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Modern Blood Culture: Management Decisions and Method Options.

Authors:  Mark D Gonzalez; Timothy Chao; Matthew A Pettengill
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2020-09-19       Impact factor: 1.935

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.