Literature DB >> 31838650

Performance of the right ventricular outflow tract/aortic diameter as a novel predictor of risk in patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Alexandru Marginean1, Andrew Putnam2, Taishi Hirai2, Anthony Serritella3, Stephanie A Besser2, Margaret Lee2, Janet Friant2, John Blair2, Atman Shah2, Sandeep Nathan2, Jonathan Chung4, Jonathan Paul2.   

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) enlargement, determined via the ratio of the right to left ventricular diameters (RV/LV) by CT imaging is used to classify the severity of acute pulmonary embolism (PE) and impacts treatment decisions. The RV/LV ratio may be an unreliable marker of RV dysfunction, due in part to the complex RV geometry. This study compared the RV/LV ratio to a novel metric, the ratio of the right ventricular to aortic outflow tract diameters (RVOT/Ao) in patients with acute PE treated with catheter-directed therapies (CDT). RVOT/Ao and RV/LV ratios were measured on CT images from 103 patients who received CDT for acute submassive or massive PE and were compared to RV dysfunction severity determined by transthoracic echocardiography. Ratios and biomarkers on admission were assessed for correlation with invasively-measured hemodynamics [right atrial (RA) pressure, mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure, cardiac output (CO)]. RVOT/Ao but not RV/LV ratios were increased in patients with moderate or severe RV dysfunction compared to those without RV dysfunction (p < 0.05). Neither ratio showed significant correlation with RA (r = 0.09 vs 0.055, p > 0.05), mean PA pressure (r = 0.167 vs 0.146, p > 0.05), or CO (r = 0.021 vs - 0.183, p > 0.05). proBNP correlated with mean PA pressure (r = 0.377, p < 0.05). The RVOT/Ao ratio may be better at assessing RV dysfunction than the RV/LV ratio in patients presenting with acute PE. Although currently accepted protocols rely on the RV/LV ratio in determining when CDT are of benefit, the RVOT/Ao ratio may be a more useful tool in identifying high risk patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Computed tomography; Massive; Pulmonary embolism; Risk; Submassive

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31838650     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-019-02021-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  23 in total

1.  Management of massive and submassive pulmonary embolism, iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis, and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Michael R Jaff; M Sean McMurtry; Stephen L Archer; Mary Cushman; Neil Goldenberg; Samuel Z Goldhaber; J Stephen Jenkins; Jeffrey A Kline; Andrew D Michaels; Patricia Thistlethwaite; Suresh Vedantham; R James White; Brenda K Zierler
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  Massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Narain Moorjani; Susanna Price
Journal:  Cardiol Clin       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.213

3.  Clinical, historical and diagnostic findings associated with right ventricular dysfunction in patients with central and non-massive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Domenico Rendina; Silvana De Bonis; Giovanni Gallotta; Vincenzo Piedimonte; Giuseppe Mossetti; Gianpaolo De Filippo; Francesca Farina; Giuseppe Vargas; Maria Rosaria Barbella; Alfredo Postiglione; Pasquale Strazzullo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  2014 ESC guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Stavros V Konstantinides; Adam Torbicki; Giancarlo Agnelli; Nicolas Danchin; David Fitzmaurice; Nazzareno Galiè; J Simon R Gibbs; Menno V Huisman; Marc Humbert; Nils Kucher; Irene Lang; Mareike Lankeit; John Lekakis; Christoph Maack; Eckhard Mayer; Nicolas Meneveau; Arnaud Perrier; Piotr Pruszczyk; Lars H Rasmussen; Thomas H Schindler; Pavel Svitil; Anton Vonk Noordegraaf; Jose Luis Zamorano; Maurizio Zompatori
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Prognostic value of echocardiography in normotensive patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Piotr Pruszczyk; Sylwia Goliszek; Barbara Lichodziejewska; Maciej Kostrubiec; Michał Ciurzyński; Katarzyna Kurnicka; Olga Dzikowska-Diduch; Piotr Palczewski; Anna Wyzgal
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01-08

6.  Acute pulmonary embolism: mortality prediction by the 2014 European Society of Cardiology risk stratification model.

Authors:  Cecilia Becattini; Giancarlo Agnelli; Mareike Lankeit; Luca Masotti; Piotr Pruszczyk; Franco Casazza; Simone Vanni; Cinzia Nitti; Pieter Kamphuisen; Maria Cristina Vedovati; Maria Grazia De Natale; Stavros Konstantinides
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 16.671

7.  Association between right ventricular function and perfusion abnormalities in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  R L Miller; S Das; T Anandarangam; D W Leibowitz; P O Alderson; B Thomashow; S Homma
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Ultrasound-accelerated catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute submassive pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Sandeep Bagla; John B Smirniotopoulos; Arletta van Breda; Michael J Sheridan; Keith M Sterling
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Drahomir Aujesky; D Scott Obrosky; Roslyn A Stone; Thomas E Auble; Arnaud Perrier; Jacques Cornuz; Pierre-Marie Roy; Michael J Fine
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-07-14       Impact factor: 21.405

10.  Changes in PESI scores predict mortality in intermediate-risk patients with acute pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Lisa Moores; Celia Zamarro; Vicente Gómez; Drahomir Aujesky; Leticia García; Rosa Nieto; Roger Yusen; David Jiménez
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 16.671

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.