Literature DB >> 31837928

Clinical Impact of Size, Shape, and Orientation of the Tricuspid Annulus in Tricuspid Regurgitation as Assessed by Three-Dimensional Echocardiography.

Hiroto Utsunomiya1, Yuji Itabashi1, Sayuki Kobayashi1, Florian Rader1, Robert J Siegel1, Takahiro Shiota2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid annuloplasty for tricuspid regurgitation (TR) depends on the measurements of tricuspid annular diameter (TAD) obtained in an apical four-chamber view on two-dimensional (2D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). We performed a combined 2D and three-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic study to understand the impact of the size, shape, and orientation of a dilated annulus on the inconsistencies between measured 2D TTE-TAD and the actual annular diameter.
METHODS: A total of 185 patients with grade ≥3+ TR and 50 controls underwent 2D TTE and 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) assessment of the tricuspid valve. The 3D TEE-TAD, defined as the longest dimension, and tricuspid annulus (TA) eccentricity index, defined as the shortest/longest dimension ratio, were obtained. The angle between the major tricuspid annulus axis and interatrial septum parallel to the vertical axis (α°) was measured as an index of TA orientation.
RESULTS: Compared with controls, TR subgroups had a larger α° irrespective of TR etiology and cardiac rhythm (P < .05), with the posteriorly displaced TA most frequently noted in patients with atrial fibrillation. An excellent correlation was found between 3D TEE-TAD and 2D TTE-TAD, but 2D TTE-TAD was significantly smaller than 3D TEE-TAD (35.9 ± 5.4 vs 39.8 ± 5.7 mm; P < .001; bias, 3.9 ± 2.6 mm; limits of agreement, -1.1-8.9 mm). After multivariate adjustment, a larger 3D TEE-TAD and larger absolute value of 90° - α° were independent determinants of the bias between 3D TEE-TAD and 2D TTE-TAD (both P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: The inconsistencies between measured 2D TTE-TAD and the actual annular diameter can be explained through morphologic factors such as TA size and orientation.
Copyright © 2019 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D echocardiography; Transesophageal echocardiography; Transthoracic echocardiography; Tricuspid annular diameter; Valvular heart disease

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31837928     DOI: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  4 in total

Review 1.  Review: application of current imaging modalities in the management of left-sided valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Robert Zheng; Kenya Kusunose
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

2.  Association between cardiovascular implantable electronic devices and tricuspid regurgitation: a case-control study.

Authors:  Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yan Cheng; Liang-Rong Zheng; Zhe-Lan Zheng
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2022

3.  Reference ranges of tricuspid annulus geometry in healthy adults using a dedicated three-dimensional echocardiography software package.

Authors:  Denisa Muraru; Mara Gavazzoni; Francesca Heilbron; Diana J Mihalcea; Andrada C Guta; Noela Radu; Giuseppe Muscogiuri; Michele Tomaselli; Sandro Sironi; Gianfranco Parati; Luigi P Badano
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-09-13

4.  Association between computed tomography-derived tricuspid annular dimensions and prognosis: insights from whole-beat computed tomography assessment.

Authors:  Kensuke Hirasawa; Federico Fortuni; Philippe J van Rosendael; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 9.130

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.