Literature DB >> 31837743

Luteal phase after conventional stimulation in the same ovarian cycle might improve the management of poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria: a case series.

Alberto Vaiarelli1, Danilo Cimadomo2, Alessandro Conforti3, Mauro Schimberni4, Maddalena Giuliani2, Pietro D'Alessandro5, Silvia Colamaria2, Carlo Alviggi3, Laura Rienzi2, Filippo Maria Ubaldi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical contribution of luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) to follicular-phase stimulation (FPS) in a single ovarian cycle (DuoStim) for poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria.
DESIGN: Observational study (years 2015-2017) including women satisfying ≥2 of the following characteristics: maternal age ≥40 years and/or ≤3 oocytes retrieved after previous conventional stimulation and/or reduced ovarian reserve (i.e., antral follicle count <7 follicles or antimüllerian hormone <1.1 ng/mL). The LPS was started regardless of the outcome of the FPS.
SETTING: Private in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S): A total of 100 of 297 patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria chose to undergo DuoStim. INTERVENTION(S): The FPS and LPS with the same antagonist protocol and agonist trigger, intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated sperm, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies, and vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The contribution of LPS to the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per intention-to-treat (ITT). RESULT(S): Patients (100) underwent FPS (maternal age, 42.1 ± 1.4 y; previous in vitro fertilization cycles with ≤3 collected oocytes, 0.7 ± 0.9; antral follicle count, 3.8 ± 1.2 follicles; and antimüllerian hormone, 0.56 ± 0.3 ng/mL). Ninety-one patients completed DuoStim. All patients were included in the analysis. More oocytes were obtained after LPS with similar developmental and chromosomal competence as paired FPS-derived ones. The CLBR per ITT increased from 7% after FPS to 15% after DuoStim. Conversely, the CLBR per ITT among the 197 patients that chose a conventional controlled ovarian stimulation strategy was 8%, as only 17 patients who were not pregnant returned for a second stimulation after the first attempt (drop-out rate, 81%). CONCLUSION(S): The LPS-derived oocytes increased the CLBR per ITT in a single ovarian cycle in patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria. The DuoStim strategy is promising to manage this thorny population of patients, especially to avoid discontinuation after a first failed attempt.
Copyright © 2019 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bologna criteria; DuoStim; double stimulation; luteal phase stimulation; poor responder

Year:  2019        PMID: 31837743     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  12 in total

1.  Double Ovarian Stimulation in the Same Ovarian Cycle.

Authors:  Corina Gica; Bogdan-Gabriel Maxim; Radu Botezatu; Gheorghe Peltecu; Anca Maria Panaitescu; Diana Iordachescu; Nicolae Gica
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2021-03

2.  How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Demian Glujovsky; Romina Pesce; Mariana Miguens; Carlos E Sueldo; Karinna Lattes; Agustín Ciapponi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2020-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Second stimulation in the same ovarian cycle: an option to fully-personalize the treatment in poor prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A.

Authors:  Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Gianluca Gennarelli; Maurizio Guido; Carlo Alviggi; Alessandro Conforti; Claudia Livi; Alberto Revelli; Silvia Colamaria; Cindy Argento; Maddalena Giuliani; Carlo De Angelis; Maria Matteo; Stefano Canosa; Angela D'Alfonso; Valentino Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-02-07       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Triple stimulation (TriStim) before bilateral oophorectomy in a young woman with ovarian cancer: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Laura C Gemmell; Jason D Wright; Paula C Brady
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2020-10-26

Review 5.  ART outcomes following ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase:a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Buo-Jia Lu; Chien-Ju Lin; Bou-Zenn Lin; Li Huang; Li-Ting Chien; Chi-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.357

6.  Development of a predictive model for luteal phase oocyte retrieval in poor responders undergoing natural cycle IVF.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Dionysios Galatis; Evangelos Maziotis; Agni Pantou; Polina Giannelou; Sokratis Grigoriadis; Panagiotis Tzonis; Theodora Griva; Athanasios Zikopoulos; Anastasios Philippou; Michael Koutsilieris; Konstantinos Pantos; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  ESHRE guideline: female fertility preservation.

Authors:  Richard A Anderson; Frédéric Amant; Didi Braat; Arianna D'Angelo; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Isabelle Demeestere; Sandra Dwek; Lucy Frith; Matteo Lambertini; Caroline Maslin; Mariana Moura-Ramos; Daniela Nogueira; Kenny Rodriguez-Wallberg; Nathalie Vermeulen
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2020-11-14

8.  Successful live birth in a Chinese woman with P450 oxidoreductase deficiency through frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a case report with review of the literature.

Authors:  Ping Pan; Lingyan Zheng; Xiaoli Chen; Jia Huang; Dongzi Yang; Yu Li
Journal:  J Ovarian Res       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 4.234

9.  Cumulative Live Birth Rate and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone-Antagonist Protocol and Multiple Minimal Ovarian Stimulation in Poor Responders.

Authors:  Yuan Liu; Rongjia Su; Yu Wu
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-01-14       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Recombinant human luteinizing hormone co-treatment in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology in women of advanced reproductive age: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Alessandro Conforti; Sandro C Esteves; Peter Humaidan; Salvatore Longobardi; Thomas D'Hooghe; Raoul Orvieto; Alberto Vaiarelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Rienzi; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Fulvio Zullo; Carlo Alviggi
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2021-06-21       Impact factor: 5.211

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.