Literature DB >> 31837649

A time-dependent role for the transcription factor CREB in neuronal allocation to an engram underlying a fear memory revealed using a novel in vivo optogenetic tool to modulate CREB function.

Albert Park1,2,3,4, Alexander D Jacob1,2,3,4, Brandon J Walters1,2,3,4, Sungmo Park1,2,3,4, Asim J Rashid1,2,3,4, Jung Hoon Jung1,2,3,4, Jocelyn Lau1, G Andrew Woolley5, Paul W Frankland1,2,3,4,6, Sheena A Josselyn7,8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

The internal representation of an experience is thought to be encoded by long-lasting physical changes to the brain ("engrams") . Previously, we and others showed within the lateral amygdala (LA), a region critical for auditory conditioned fear, eligible neurons compete against one other for allocation to an engram. Neurons with relatively higher function of the transcription factor CREB were more likely to be allocated to the engram. In these studies, though, CREB function was artificially increased for several days before training. Precisely when increased CREB function is important for allocation remains an unanswered question. Here, we took advantage of a novel optogenetic tool (opto-DN-CREB) to gain spatial and temporal control of CREB function in freely behaving mice. We found increasing CREB function in a small, random population of LA principal neurons in the minutes, but not 24 h, before training was sufficient to enhance memory, likely because these neurons were preferentially allocated to the underlying engram. However, similarly increasing CREB activity in a small population of random LA neurons immediately after training disrupted subsequent memory retrieval, likely by disrupting the precise spatial and temporal patterns of offline post-training neuronal activity and/or function required for consolidation. These findings reveal the importance of the timing of CREB activity in regulating allocation and subsequent memory retrieval, and further, highlight the potential of optogenetic approaches to control protein function with temporal specificity in behaving animals.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31837649      PMCID: PMC7162924          DOI: 10.1038/s41386-019-0588-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  83 in total

Review 1.  Memory Engram Cells Have Come of Age.

Authors:  Susumu Tonegawa; Xu Liu; Steve Ramirez; Roger Redondo
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 2.  Finding the engram.

Authors:  Sheena A Josselyn; Stefan Köhler; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 34.870

3.  Localization of a stable neural correlate of associative memory.

Authors:  Leon G Reijmers; Brian L Perkins; Naoki Matsuo; Mark Mayford
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-08-31       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Selective erasure of a fear memory.

Authors:  Jin-Hee Han; Steven A Kushner; Adelaide P Yiu; Hwa-Lin Liz Hsiang; Thorsten Buch; Ari Waisman; Bruno Bontempi; Rachael L Neve; Paul W Frankland; Sheena A Josselyn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Heroes of the Engram.

Authors:  Sheena A Josselyn; Stefan Köhler; Paul W Frankland
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Rehebbilitating Memory.

Authors:  Tomás J Ryan; Susumu Tonegawa
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 7.853

7.  Hippocampal memory traces are differentially modulated by experience, time, and adult neurogenesis.

Authors:  Christine A Denny; Mazen A Kheirbek; Eva L Alba; Kenji F Tanaka; Rebecca A Brachman; Kimberly B Laughman; Nicole K Tomm; Gergely F Turi; Attila Losonczy; René Hen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 8.  The neurobiological foundation of memory retrieval.

Authors:  Paul W Frankland; Sheena A Josselyn; Stefan Köhler
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Temporal evolution of cortical ensembles promoting remote memory retrieval.

Authors:  Laura A DeNardo; Cindy D Liu; William E Allen; Eliza L Adams; Drew Friedmann; Lisa Fu; Casey J Guenthner; Marc Tessier-Lavigne; Liqun Luo
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-28       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  A robust activity marking system for exploring active neuronal ensembles.

Authors:  Andreas T Sørensen; Yonatan A Cooper; Michael V Baratta; Feng-Ju Weng; Yuxiang Zhang; Kartik Ramamoorthi; Robin Fropf; Emily LaVerriere; Jian Xue; Andrew Young; Colleen Schneider; Casper René Gøtzsche; Martin Hemberg; Jerry Cp Yin; Steven F Maier; Yingxi Lin
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 8.140

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Infralimbic cortex functioning across motivated behaviors: Can the differences be reconciled?

Authors:  Kelle E Nett; Ryan T LaLumiere
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 8.989

2.  Structure-based design of a photoswitchable affibody scaffold.

Authors:  Ryan M Woloschuk; P Maximilian M Reed; Anna S I Jaikaran; Karl Z Demmans; Jeffrey Youn; Voula Kanelis; Maruti Uppalapati; G Andrew Woolley
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Formation and fate of an engram in the lateral amygdala supporting a rewarding memory in mice.

Authors:  Albert Park; Alexander D Jacob; Hwa-Lin Liz Hsiang; Paul W Frankland; John G Howland; Sheena A Josselyn
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 8.294

Review 4.  Steering Molecular Activity with Optogenetics: Recent Advances and Perspectives.

Authors:  Teak-Jung Oh; Huaxun Fan; Savanna S Skeeters; Kai Zhang
Journal:  Adv Biol (Weinh)       Date:  2021-01-14

5.  Mechanism of seizure-induced retrograde amnesia.

Authors:  Aijaz Ahmad Naik; Huayu Sun; Cedric L Williams; Daniel S Weller; J Julius Zhu; Jaideep Kapur
Journal:  Prog Neurobiol       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 11.685

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.