Literature DB >> 31836938

Characteristics and outcomes of patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.

David J Shaz1, Stephen M Pastores2, Debra A Goldman3, Natalie Kostelecky2, Richard F Tizon4, Kay See Tan3, Neil A Halpern2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of adult patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit (ICU).
METHODS: This was a retrospective single-center study comparing the outcomes of patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy in the ICU with a matched cohort of ICU patients (by age, sex, and tumor type) who did not receive chemotherapy. Conditional logistic regression and shared frailty Cox regression were used to assess short-term (ICU and hospital) mortality and death by 12-month post-hospital discharge, respectively.
RESULTS: Seventy-three patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy in the ICU were successfully matched. The most common solid tumors included thoracic (30%), genitourinary (26%), and breast (16%). The ICU, hospital, and 12-month (post discharge)  mortality rates of patients who recieved chomtherapy in the ICU were 23%, 36%, and 43%, respectively. When compared to the matched cohort of patients who did not receive chemotherapy, patients who received chemotherapy had a significantly longer length of stay in the ICU (median 7 vs. 4 days, p < 0.001) and hospital (median 15 vs. 11 days, p = 0.011) but similar short-term ICU and hospital mortality rates (23% vs. 18% and 36% vs. 38%, respectively). Patients who received chemotherapy in the ICU were at a lower risk of death by 12 months (HR 0.31, p < 0.001) compared to the matched cohort on multivariable analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with solid tumors who received chemotherapy had increased ICU and hospital length of stay compared to patients who did not. Although short-term mortality did not differ, patients who received chemotherapy in the ICU had improved long-term survival. Our data can inform critical care triage decisions to include patients who are to receive chemotherapy in the ICU.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Chemotherapy; Intensive care unit; Outcomes; Solid tumors

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31836938      PMCID: PMC8286144          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05226-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  17 in total

1.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  Risk factors to predict outcome in critically ill cancer patients receiving chemotherapy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Jae-Uk Song; Gee Young Suh; Man Pyo Chung; Hojoong Kim; O Jung Kwon; Chul Won Jung; Won Ki Kang; Keunchil Park; Kyeongman Jeon
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2010-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Urgent Chemotherapy for Life-Threatening Complications Related to Solid Neoplasms.

Authors:  Yoann Zerbib; Antoine Rabbat; Muriel Fartoukh; Naïke Bigé; Claire Andréjak; Julien Mayaux; Nicolas De Prost; Benoît Misset; Virginie Lemiale; Fabrice Bruneel; Julien Maizel; Sylvie Ricome; Frédéric Jacobs; Caroline Bornstain; Hervé Dupont; François Baudin; Elie Azoulay; Frédéric Pène
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  CCC meets ICU: redefining the role of critical care of cancer patients.

Authors:  Michael von Bergwelt-Baildon; Michael J Hallek; Alexander A Shimabukuro-Vornhagen; Matthias Kochanek
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-11-08       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 5.  Critical care of patients with cancer.

Authors:  Alexander Shimabukuro-Vornhagen; Boris Böll; Matthias Kochanek; Éli Azoulay; Michael S von Bergwelt-Baildon
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Impact of Urgent Chemotherapy in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Franca de Oliveira; Juliana Carvalho Ferreira; Antonio Paulo Nassar Junior; Aldo Lourenço Abbade Dettino; Pedro Caruso
Journal:  J Intensive Care Med       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 3.510

7.  Survival methods, including those using competing risk analysis, are not appropriate for intensive care unit outcome studies.

Authors:  David Schoenfeld
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Intensive care admission of cancer patients: a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Monique M E M Bos; Ilona W M Verburg; Ineke Dumaij; Jacqueline Stouthard; Johannes W R Nortier; Dick Richel; Eric P A van der Zwan; Nicolette F de Keizer; Evert de Jonge
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-04-18       Impact factor: 4.452

9.  Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients with Cancer-Related Complications.

Authors:  Viviane B L Torres; Juliana Vassalo; Ulysses V A Silva; Pedro Caruso; André P Torelly; Eliezer Silva; José M M Teles; Marcos Knibel; Ederlon Rezende; José J S Netto; Claudio Piras; Luciano C P Azevedo; Fernando A Bozza; Nelson Spector; Jorge I F Salluh; Marcio Soares
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Outcomes of cancer therapy administered to treatment-naïve lung cancer patients in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Yen-Fu Chen; Jou-Wei Lin; Chao-Chi Ho; Ching-Yao Yang; Chia-Hao Chang; Tao-Min Huang; Chung-Yu Chen; Kuan-Yu Chen; Jin-Yuan Shih; Chong-Jen Yu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.207

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.