Literature DB >> 31836651

Energy compensation and received echo level dynamics in CF bats during active target approaches.

Laura Stidsholt1, Rolf Müller2,3, Kristian Beedholm4, Ma Hui3, Mark Johnson4,5, Peter Teglberg Madsen4,6.   

Abstract

Bats have been reported to adjust the energy of their outgoing vocalizations to target range (R) in a logarithmic fashion close to 20log10(R) which has been interpreted as providing one-way compensation for increasing echo levels during target approaches. However, it remains unknown how species using high frequency calls, which are strongly affected by absorption, adjust their vocal outputs during approaches to point-targets. We hypothesized that such species should compensate less than the 20log10(R) model predicts at longer distances and more at shorter distances due to the significant influence of absorption at longer ranges. Using a microphone array and an acoustic recording tag, we show that the output adjustments of two Hipposideros pratti and one H. armiger do not decrease logarithmically during approaches to different sized targets. Consequently, received echo levels increase dramatically early in the approach phase with near constant output levels, but level off late in the approach phase due to substantial output reductions. To improve echo-to-noise ratio, we suggest that bats using higher frequency vocalizations compensate less at longer ranges, where they are strongly affected by absorption. Close to the target, they decrease their output levels dramatically to mitigate reception of very high echo levels. This strategy maintains received echo levels between 6 to 40 dB re 20µPa2s across different target sizes. The bats partially compensated for target size, but not in a one-to-one dB fashion, showing that these bats do not seek to stabilize perceived echo levels, but may instead use them to gauge target size.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Atmospheric absorption; CF bats; Echo level; Energy compensation; Source level; Target approach

Year:  2019        PMID: 31836651     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.217109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  2 in total

1.  Echo feedback mediates noise-induced vocal modifications in flying bats.

Authors:  Jinhong Luo; Manman Lu; Jie Luo; Cynthia F Moss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 2.389

2.  Hunting bats adjust their echolocation to receive weak prey echoes for clutter reduction.

Authors:  Laura Stidsholt; Stefan Greif; Holger R Goerlitz; Kristian Beedholm; Jamie Macaulay; Mark Johnson; Peter Teglberg Madsen
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 14.136

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.