Literature DB >> 31834671

Pesticides in cannabis: A review of analytical and toxicological considerations.

Amelia Taylor1, Jason W Birkett1.   

Abstract

A review of the literature surrounding the use, analysis, and detection of pesticide material for cannabis cultivation is presented. The use of pesticides in crop cultivation is not new, and cannabis crops are no exception. Studies have found that the use of these are common and that high levels of the pesticides are transferred into the cannabis smoke. The most common pesticide classes associated with cannabis are insecticides, acaricides, and fungicides. Over 350 different pesticide products may be used on cannabis materials and of these, 16 pesticides and three plant growth regulators (PGR) are considered to be the main candidates. Many of the pesticides found in cannabis samples destined for consumption are classed as moderately hazardous by the World Health Organization. Analytical methods for pesticide detection on cannabis are being developed with a view to implementing quality control of cannabis, where it is legal, before being sold. However, no standardized protocol exists. The pesticide levels found in the cannabis samples tested were generally low (less than μg/g), these results do not, however, provide information on chronic low-dose adverse effects of pesticides in relation to cannabis consumption. Currently no research exists on the toxicity of pyrolyzed pesticides in humans from smoking cannabis. More studies are needed to further understand this potentially harmful health threat.
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GC-MS; LC-MS/MS; cannabis; pesticides; toxicity

Year:  2020        PMID: 31834671     DOI: 10.1002/dta.2747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Test Anal        ISSN: 1942-7603            Impact factor:   3.345


  7 in total

1.  Marijuana smoking and cataract.

Authors:  S Lehrer; P H Rheinstein
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.194

2.  Cannabis smoking and glaucoma in the UK Biobank cohort.

Authors:  S Lehrer; P H Rheinstein
Journal:  J Fr Ophtalmol       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 1.194

3.  Use of computational toxicology tools to predict in vivo endpoints associated with Mode of Action and the endocannabinoid system: A case study with chlorpyrifos, chlorpyrifos-oxon and Δ9Tetrahydrocannabinol.

Authors:  Marilyn Silva; Ryan Kin-Hin Kwok
Journal:  Curr Res Toxicol       Date:  2022-02-07

4.  Development and Validation of a Novel and Fast Detection Method for Cannabis sativa: A 19-Plex Short Tandem Repeat Typing System.

Authors:  Ruocheng Xia; Ruiyang Tao; Yiling Qu; Xiaochun Zhang; Huan Yu; Chunyan Yuan; Suhua Zhang; Chengtao Li
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 5.753

5.  Comparison of State-Level Regulations for Cannabis Contaminants and Implications for Public Health.

Authors:  Laura E Jameson; Kendra D Conrow; Dorina V Pinkhasova; Haleigh L Boulanger; Hyunji Ha; Negar Jourabchian; Steven A Johnson; Michael P Simeone; Iniobong A Afia; Thomas M Cahill; Cindy S Orser; Maxwell C K Leung
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 11.035

6.  In vitro metabolism of tebuconazole, flurtamone, fenhexamid, metalaxyl-M and spirodiclofen in Cannabis sativa L. (hemp) callus cultures.

Authors:  Leonie Hillebrands; Marc Lamshoeft; Andreas Lagojda; Andreas Stork; Oliver Kayser
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2021-08-06       Impact factor: 4.462

7.  Analysis of the California list of pesticides, mycotoxins, and cannabinoids in chocolate using liquid chromatography and low-pressure gas chromatography-based platforms.

Authors:  Nathaly Reyes-Garcés; Colton Myers
Journal:  J Sep Sci       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.645

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.