Literature DB >> 31834515

Detrital carbon production and export in high latitude kelp forests.

Morten Foldager Pedersen1, Karen Filbee-Dexter2,3, Kjell Magnus Norderhaug3, Stein Fredriksen4, Nicolai Lond Frisk5, Camilla With Fagerli2, Thomas Wernberg5,6.   

Abstract

The production and fate of seaweed detritus is a major unknown in the global C-budget. Knowing the quantity of detritus produced, the form it takes (size) and its timing of delivery are key to understanding its role as a resource subsidy to secondary production and/or its potential contribution to C-sequestration. We quantified the production and release of detritus from 10 Laminaria hyperborea sites in northern Norway (69.6° N). Kelp biomass averaged 770 ± 100 g C m-2 while net production reached 499 ± 50 g C m-2 year-1, with most taking place in spring when new blades were formed. Production of biomass was balanced by a similar formation of detritus (478 ± 41 g C m-2 year-1), and both were unrelated to wave exposure when compared across sites. Distal blade erosion accounted for 23% of the total detritus production and was highest during autumn and winter, while dislodgment of whole individuals and/or whole blades corresponded to 24% of the detritus production. Detachment of old blades constituted the largest source of kelp detritus, accounting for > 50% of the total detrital production. Almost 80% of the detritus from L. hyperborea was thus in the form of whole plants or blades and > 60% of that was delivered as a large pulse within 1-2 months in spring. The discrete nature of the delivery suggests that the detritus cannot be retained and consumed locally and that some is exported to adjacent deep areas where it may subsidize secondary production or become buried into deep marine sediments as blue carbon.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbon sequestration; Detritus; Drift; Resource subsidy; Seaweed

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31834515     DOI: 10.1007/s00442-019-04573-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oecologia        ISSN: 0029-8549            Impact factor:   3.225


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Insights into the Molecular Mode of Action of Seaweed-Based Biostimulants and the Sustainability of Seaweeds as Raw Material Resources.

Authors:  Neerakkal Sujeeth; Veselin Petrov; Kieran J Guinan; Fiaz Rasul; John T O'Sullivan; Tsanko S Gechev
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 6.208

Review 2.  Whole System Analysis Is Required To Determine The Fate Of Macroalgal Carbon: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Jessie Dolliver; Nessa O'Connor
Journal:  J Phycol       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Climate-driven shifts in kelp forest composition reduce carbon sequestration potential.

Authors:  Luka Seamus Wright; Albert Pessarrodona; Andy Foggo
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 13.211

4.  Marine heatwaves and the collapse of marginal North Atlantic kelp forests.

Authors:  K Filbee-Dexter; T Wernberg; S P Grace; J Thormar; S Fredriksen; C N Narvaez; C J Feehan; K M Norderhaug
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Quality Traits and Nutritional Value of Pork and Poultry Meat from Animals Fed with Seaweeds.

Authors:  David Miguel Ribeiro; Cátia Falcão Martins; Mónica Costa; Diogo Coelho; José Pestana; Cristina Alfaia; Madalena Lordelo; André Martinho de Almeida; João Pedro Bengala Freire; José António Mestre Prates
Journal:  Foods       Date:  2021-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.