Literature DB >> 31834512

Safety and efficacy of post-anastomotic intraoperative endoscopy to avoid early anastomotic complications during gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Ji-Ho Park1, Sang-Ho Jeong1, Young-Joon Lee2, Tae Han Kim1, Jong-Man Kim1, Dong-Hwan Kim1, Seung-Jin Kwag1, Ju-Yeon Kim1, Taejin Park1, Chi-Young Jeong1, Young-Tae Ju1, Eun-Jung Jung1, Soon-Chan Hong1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic complications such as leaks, bleeding, and stricture remain the most serious complications of surgery for gastric cancer. No perfect method exists for an accurate and reliable prevention of these complications. This study investigated the safety and efficacy of post-anastomotic intraoperative endoscopy (PAIOE) for avoidance of early anastomotic complications during gastrectomy in gastric cancer.
METHODS: This retrospective case-control study enrolled patients from a tertiary care, academic medical center. Routine PAIOE was performed on 319 patients undergoing gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2015 and 2016. As controls, without PAIOE 270 patients from 2013 to 2014 were used for comparison. Early anastomotic complications and outcomes after PAIOE were determined.
RESULTS: Although there were no differences between the PAIOE and non-PAIOE group in terms of overall complication rates (20.1% vs 26.7%; P > 0.05), there were fewer complications related to anastomosis (3.4% vs 8.9%; P < 0.01) in the PAIOE group. The PAIOE group had rates of 2.5% for anastomotic leakage, 0.9% for intra-luminal bleeding, and 0% for anastomotic stenosis, while the non-PAIOE group exhibited rates of 5.6%, 2.6%, and 0.7%, respectively. Thirty-one abnormalities were detected in 26 PAIOE patients (9.71%) (20 venous bleeding, 7 mucosal tearing, 2 air leaks, 1 arterial bleeding, and 1 anastomotic stricture). All abnormalities were corrected by proper interventions (13 reinforced additional suture, 13 endoscopic hemostasis, and 2 re-anastomosis). There were no morbidities associated with PAIOE.
CONCLUSIONS: PAIOE appears to be a safe and reliable procedure to evaluate the stability of gastrointestinal anastomosis for gastric cancer patients. Further data collection and a well-designed prospective study are needed to confirm the validity of PAIOE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anastomotic leak; Intraoperative endoscopy; Postoperative complications; Postoperative hemorrhage; Stomach neoplasm

Year:  2019        PMID: 31834512     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-07319-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  9 in total

1.  The effect of intraoperative distractions on severe technical events in laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Suzan Ayas; Lauren Gordon; Birsen Donmez; Teodor Grantcharov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-19       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Non-technical skills and device-related interruptions in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Sahil Sharma; Teodor Grantcharov; James J Jung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Clinical outcomes of patients with complicated post-operative course after gastrectomy for cancer: a GIRCG study using the GASTRODATA registry.

Authors:  Gian Luca Baiocchi; Simone Giacopuzzi; Giovanni Vittimberga; Stefano De Pascale; Elisabetta Pastorelli; Roberta Gelmini; Jacopo Viganò; Luigina Graziosi; Alessio Vagliasindi; Fausto Rosa; Francesca Steccanella; Paolo Demartini; Rossella Reddavid; Mattia Berselli; Ugo Elmore; Uberto Fumagalli Romario; Maurizio Degiuli; Paolo Morgagni; Daniele Marrelli; Domenico D'Ugo; Riccardo Rosati; Giovanni De Manzoni
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2022-07-05

4.  The First Systematic Gastroscopy Training Program for Surgeons in Korea.

Authors:  Ho Seok Seo; So Jung Kim; Chul Hyo Jeon; Kyo Young Song; Han Hong Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 5.354

5.  Retrograde artery first approach for "shoulder" pancreatic cancers in minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Feng Tian; Meng-Qing Sun; Jun Lu; Jun-Chao Guo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Implementing structured team debriefing using a Black Box in the operating room: surveying team satisfaction.

Authors:  A S H M van Dalen; M Jansen; M van Haperen; S van Dieren; C J Buskens; E J M Nieveen van Dijkum; W A Bemelman; T P Grantcharov; M P Schijven
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 7.  Intraoperative Tumor Localization of Early Gastric Cancers.

Authors:  Sang-Ho Jeong; Kyung Won Seo; Jae-Seok Min
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.720

8.  Robotic-assisted versus open distal pancreatectomy for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: a propensity score-matched study.

Authors:  Yuanchi Weng; Jiabin Jin; Zhen Huo; Yusheng Shi; Yu Jiang; Xiaxing Deng; Chenghong Peng; Baiyong Shen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic Local Resection through Subserosal Dissection with Endoscopic Air-Insufflation for Submucosal Tumors Located Near the Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  In-Kyeong Kim; Ji-Ho Park; Young-Joon Lee; Sang-Ho Jeong; Tae Han Kim; Dong-Hwan Kim; Han-Gil Kim; Jin-Kyu Cho; Jae-Myung Kim; Seung-Jin Kwag; Ju-Yeon Kim; Chi-Young Jeong; Young-Tae Ju; Eun-Jung Jung; Soon-Chan Hong
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2020-12-15
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.