Literature DB >> 31834211

Spatial Hearing as a Function of Presentation Level in Moderate-to-Severe Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss.

Nicholas J Thompson1, Stacey L G Kane, Nicole E Corbin, Michael W Canfarotta, Emily Buss.   

Abstract

HYPOTHESIS: Patients with moderate-to-severe unilateral conductive hearing loss (UCHL) can make use of binaural difference cues when stimuli are presented at a high enough intensity to provide audibility in the affected ear.
BACKGROUND: Spatial hearing is essential for listening in complex environments and sound source localization. Patients with UCHL have decreased access to binaural difference cues, resulting in poorer spatial hearing abilities compared with listeners with normal hearing.
METHODS: Twelve patients with moderate-to-severe UCHL, most due to atresia (83.3%), and 12 age-matched controls with normal hearing bilaterally participated in this study. Outcome measures included: 1) spatial release from masking, and 2) sound source localization. Speech reception thresholds were measured with target speech (Pediatric AzBio sentences) presented at 0 degree and a two-talker masker that was either colocated with the target (0 degree) or spatially separated from the target (symmetrical, ±90 degrees). Spatial release from masking was quantified as the difference between speech reception thresholds in these two conditions. Localization ability in the horizontal plane was assessed in a 180 degree arc of 11 evenly-spaced loudspeakers. These two tasks were completed at 50 and 75 dB SPL.
RESULTS: Both children and adults with UCHL performed more poorly than controls when recognizing speech in a spatially separated masker or localizing sound; however, this group difference was larger at 50 than 75 dB SPL.
CONCLUSION: Patients with UCHL experience improved spatial hearing with the higher presentation level, suggesting that the auditory deprivation associated with a moderate-to-severe UCHL does not preclude exposure to-or use of-binaural difference cues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31834211      PMCID: PMC6954336          DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002475

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.619


  32 in total

Review 1.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

2.  Development and validation of the pediatric AzBio sentence lists.

Authors:  Anthony J Spahr; Michael F Dorman; Leonid M Litvak; Sarah J Cook; Louise M Loiselle; Melissa D DeJong; Andrea Hedley-Williams; Linsey S Sunderhaus; Catherine A Hayes; René H Gifford
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Surgery or implantable hearing devices in children with congenital aural atresia: 25 years of our experience.

Authors:  Andrea Jovankovičová; Roman Staník; Samuel Kunzo; Lucia Majáková; Milan Profant
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 1.675

4.  The effect of head-induced interaural time and level differences on speech intelligibility in noise.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Binaural speech intelligibility in noise for hearing-impaired listeners.

Authors:  A W Bronkhorst; R Plomp
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Congenital aural atresia: bone-anchored hearing aid vs. external auditory canal reconstruction.

Authors:  Sarah Bouhabel; Pierre Arcand; Issam Saliba
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 1.675

7.  Monaural versus binaural hearing: ease of listening, word recognition, and attentional effort.

Authors:  J F Feuerstein
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Effects of aural atresia on speech development and learning: retrospective analysis from a multidisciplinary craniofacial clinic.

Authors:  Daniel R Jensen; Lynn M Grames; Judith E C Lieu
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 9.  Developmental plasticity of spatial hearing following asymmetric hearing loss: context-dependent cue integration and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Peter Keating; Andrew J King
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-27

10.  Effects of Cochlear Implantation on Binaural Hearing in Adults With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Margaret T Dillon; Meredith A Rooth; English R King; Ellen J Deres; Craig A Buchman; Harold C Pillsbury; Kevin D Brown
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

View more
  3 in total

1.  Instant improvement in monaural spatial hearing abilities through cognitive feedback.

Authors:  Tine Arras; Hillary Snapp; Anouk Sangen; Chantal Snels; Iris Kuntz; Tinne Theunen; Kiana Kheirkhah; Andrzej Zarowski; Thomas Wesarg; Astrid van Wieringen; Martijn J H Agterberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 2.064

2.  Characteristics of sound localization in children with unilateral microtia and atresia and predictors of localization improvement when using a bone conduction device.

Authors:  Yujie Liu; Chunli Zhao; Lin Yang; Peiwei Chen; Jinsong Yang; Danni Wang; Ran Ren; Ying Li; Shouqin Zhao; Shusheng Gong
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 5.152

3.  Toward Optimal Care for Children With Congenital Unilateral Aural Atresia.

Authors:  Filip Asp; Robert J Stokroos; Martijn J H Agterberg
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 4.003

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.