Literature DB >> 31834209

Predicting Reduced Tinnitus Burden After Cochlear Implantation in Adults.

Peter R Dixon1,2, Matthew Crowson1, David Shipp3, Kari Smilsky3, Vincent Y Lin1,1,3, Trung Le1,1,3, Joseph M Chen1,2,1,3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Explore patient characteristics associated with tinnitus improvement after cochlear implantation. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort.
SETTING: Tertiary referral. PATIENTS: Adults with bilateral severe-to-profound hearing loss and tinnitus.
INTERVENTIONS: Unilateral cochlear implantation.
RESULTS: From 1996 to 2018, 358 patients endorsed pre-implant tinnitus and had ascertainable tinnitus status at 1-year. Clinically significant improvement in Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) (reduction by at least 7-points) was observed in 262 (73.2%) patients, of whom 155 (59.2%) reported complete resolution. Of the 24 characteristics explored, four were identified as independent predictors of improved tinnitus in logistic regression models. In a multivariable model including identified independent predictors, each 10-percentage point increase in baseline hearing in noise test was associated with an 14% reduction in odds of tinnitus resolution or clinically significant improvement (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence limits [CL] 0.77, 0.96) and preoperative use of a hearing aid in the contralateral ear was associated with a 72% reduction (OR 0.28; 95% CL 0.11, 0.73). Each 10-point increase in baseline Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHI) score was associated with a 28% increase in odds of tinnitus improvement (OR 1.28; 95% CL 1.07, 1.54). Higher baseline burden of tinnitus was associated with higher odds of tinnitus improvement (OR 1.21 per 10-point THI increase, 95% CL 1.04, 1.40).
CONCLUSIONS: Worse residual hearing and higher baseline hearing and tinnitus handicap are associated with higher odds of tinnitus improvement. Expectations of patients seeking reduced tinnitus burden following cochlear implantation should be managed by counselling regarding odds of tinnitus improvement compared to those with similar residual hearing and tinnitus burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31834209     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  3 in total

1.  Effect of electrical stimulation with a cochlear implant on tinnitus impact: protocol of an individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kelly Assouly; Adriana L Smit; Inge Stegeman
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Analysis of a Cochlear Implant Database: Changes in Tinnitus Prevalence and Distress After Cochlear Implantation.

Authors:  Kelly K S Assouly; Adriana L Smit; Robert H Eikelboom; Cathy Sucher; Marcus Atlas; Robert J Stokroos; Inge Stegeman
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

Review 3.  Multidisciplinary Tinnitus Research: Challenges and Future Directions From the Perspective of Early Stage Researchers.

Authors:  Jorge Piano Simoes; Elza Daoud; Maryam Shabbir; Sana Amanat; Kelly Assouly; Roshni Biswas; Chiara Casolani; Albi Dode; Falco Enzler; Laure Jacquemin; Mie Joergensen; Tori Kok; Nuwan Liyanage; Matheus Lourenco; Punitkumar Makani; Muntazir Mehdi; Anissa L Ramadhani; Constanze Riha; Jose Lopez Santacruz; Axel Schiller; Stefan Schoisswohl; Natalia Trpchevska; Eleni Genitsaridi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 5.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.