Literature DB >> 31834035

Bundled Payment Plans Are Associated With Notable Cost Savings for Ambulatory Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Jordan D Walters1, Ryan N Walsh, Richard A Smith, Tyler J Brolin, Frederick M Azar, Thomas W Throckmorton.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Bundling of services, typically into a 90-day episode of care, is intended to facilitate cost reduction. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a private insurance bundling program on the costs of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) at a freestanding ambulatory surgery center.
METHODS: A cost minimization analysis was done of patients who had anatomic TSA by a single surgeon at a single freestanding ambulatory surgery center, including line-by-line comparisons of demographic and comorbidity factors for all patients treated within the 90-day episode of care.
RESULTS: Seventy-six primary anatomic TSAs were included, 39 in the bundled group and 37 outside of the program. The bundled group was on average older (58 years) than the unbundled group (54 years, P = 0.021), but the groups were otherwise similar in demographics. The average total implant charges were significantly less for the bundled group ($24,822.43 versus $28,405.51, P = 0.014). Average total surgery supply charges and anesthesia supply charges were similar (P > 0.05). Mean total outpatient surgical day charges (implants, surgical, and anesthesia equipment) were significantly less for the bundled group ($29,782.43 versus $33,238.68, P = 0.022), as were average operating room staffing costs ($135.37 versus $162.55, P = 0.015). During the 90-day postoperative period, charges were similar.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary anatomic TSA using a bundled care program in an outpatient setting coincides with markedly lower charges. The primary driver of this reduction is implant pricing, which is negotiated as part of the bundle. Surgeons must carefully analyze their unique practices in the changing economic health care environment when creating an outpatient TSA and/or bundling program. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III economic analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 31834035     DOI: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-19-00441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg        ISSN: 1067-151X            Impact factor:   3.020


  6 in total

Review 1.  Current Status Regarding the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Richard N Puzzitiello; Michael A Moverman; Nicholas R Pagani; Mariano E Menendez; Matthew J Salzler
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2021-07-05

Review 2.  Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sachin Allahabadi; Edward C Cheung; Jonathan D Hodax; Brian T Feeley; Chunbong B Ma; Drew A Lansdown
Journal:  J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast       Date:  2021-06-25

3.  Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time.

Authors:  Nabil Mehta; Daniel D Bohl; Matthew R Cohn; Johnathon R McCormick; Gregory P Nicholson; Grant E Garrigues; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-11-14

4.  Artificial Learning and Machine Learning Applications in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Cesar D Lopez; Venkat Boddapati; Joseph M Lombardi; Nathan J Lee; Justin Mathew; Nicholas C Danford; Rajiv R Iyer; Marc D Dyrszka; Zeeshan M Sardar; Lawrence G Lenke; Ronald A Lehman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2022-02-28

5.  A systematic review of clinical outcomes for outpatient vs. inpatient shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Edward Perera; Breanne Flood; Kim Madden; Danny P Goel; Timothy Leroux; Moin Khan
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2021-04-28

6.  Complication rates and outcomes after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Hailey P Huddleston; Nabil Mehta; Evan M Polce; Brady T Williams; Michael C Fu; Adam B Yanke; Nikhil N Verma
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2021-01-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.