Fei Song1, Chuan Liu2, Junyong Zhang1, Yusheng Lei1, Zili Hu1. 1. Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. 2. Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. liuchuan100@hospital.cqmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the antibacterial effect of fosfomycin tromethamine (FT) on the bacteria inside urinary infection stones. METHODS: The internal structures of urinary stones were observed via scanning electron microscopy to verify the presence of internal bacteria. We randomly assigned equal numbers of patients with kidney stones who met the inclusion criteria into two groups in a prospective study and treated them with differentperioperative antibiotics. One group (experimental group) was treated with FT, and the other (control group) was treated with cefuroxime sodium. All stone specimens were collected via percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The primary infection stones were screened via a stone component analysis, 30 cases in the experimental group and 31 cases in the control group. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry was used to measure the drug concentration inside the stones, the bacterial count was calculated via stone culture, and the clinical infection index were monitored for between-group comparisons. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a higher internal drug concentration, a higher drug sensitivity against various pathogenic bacteria, a lower bacterial colony count in the stone culture, and a lower incidence of postoperative clinical infection. CONCLUSIONS: FT is more effective than cefuroxime, which is commonly used during the perioperative period of urinary stones, and exerts a high antibacterial effect on these internal bacteria, and effectively reduces the probability of infection and sepsis after urinary stone surgery. FT can be used as an antibiotic during the perioperative period of urinary stones.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the antibacterial effect of fosfomycin tromethamine (FT) on the bacteria inside urinary infection stones. METHODS: The internal structures of urinary stones were observed via scanning electron microscopy to verify the presence of internal bacteria. We randomly assigned equal numbers of patients with kidney stones who met the inclusion criteria into two groups in a prospective study and treated them with different perioperative antibiotics. One group (experimental group) was treated with FT, and the other (control group) was treated with cefuroxime sodium. All stone specimens were collected via percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). The primary infection stones were screened via a stone component analysis, 30 cases in the experimental group and 31 cases in the control group. High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-mass spectrometry was used to measure the drug concentration inside the stones, the bacterial count was calculated via stone culture, and the clinical infection index were monitored for between-group comparisons. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the experimental group had a higher internal drug concentration, a higher drug sensitivity against various pathogenic bacteria, a lower bacterial colony count in the stone culture, and a lower incidence of postoperative clinical infection. CONCLUSIONS:FT is more effective than cefuroxime, which is commonly used during the perioperative period of urinary stones, and exerts a high antibacterial effect on these internal bacteria, and effectively reduces the probability of infection and sepsis after urinary stone surgery. FT can be used as an antibiotic during the perioperative period of urinary stones.
Authors: R Moreno; J L Vincent; R Matos; A Mendonça; F Cantraine; L Thijs; J Takala; C Sprung; M Antonelli; H Bruining; S Willatts Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 1999-07 Impact factor: 17.440