Literature DB >> 31832769

[The care-wage penalty: the association between family care and wages].

U Ehrlich1, L Minkus2, M Hess2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Against the background of demographic aging, the need for professional and private care will increase in the future. To contain costs many welfare states rely on the family as care provider and, in addition, people in need of care often prefer being cared for at home. Thus, the number of people who provide care privately and without pay in the home environment (referred to as family care in this article) is likely to increase. So far, however, research on the impact of family care on the labor market situation of caregivers in general and their wages in particular remains scarce.
OBJECTIVE: This article examines whether and if so to what extent, family care affects the wages of women and men.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel (2001-2017), fixed effects regressions were estimated separately for women and men, while accounting for important confounders.
RESULTS: Both women (2.4%) and men (3%) suffer wage losses as a result of family care activities.
CONCLUSION: The results indicate that care-related wage losses, net of relevant controls, exist.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Employment; Family care; Fixed effects regressions; Social inequality; Wage penalty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31832769     DOI: 10.1007/s00391-019-01666-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr        ISSN: 0948-6704            Impact factor:   1.281


  4 in total

1.  The earnings of informal carers: wage differentials and opportunity costs.

Authors:  Axel Heitmueller; Kirsty Inglis
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.883

2.  Health effects of informal caregiving across Europe: A longitudinal approach.

Authors:  Judith Kaschowitz; Martina Brandt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-11-27       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Informal care and long-term labor market outcomes.

Authors:  Hendrik Schmitz; Matthias Westphal
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 3.883

4.  The effect of informal care on work and wages.

Authors:  Courtney Harold Van Houtven; Norma B Coe; Meghan M Skira
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.883

  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  The significance of occupations, family responsibilities, and gender for working from home: Lessons from COVID-19.

Authors:  Lara Minkus; Nicolai Groepler; Sonja Drobnič
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.