| Literature DB >> 31832636 |
Wellington Murenjekwa1, Rachel Makasi1, Robert Ntozini1, Bernard Chasekwa1, Kuda Mutasa1, Lawrence H Moulton2, James M Tielsch3, Jean H Humphrey1,2, Laura E Smith1,4, Andrew J Prendergast1,5, Claire D Bourke1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosoma haematobium is a parasitic helminth that causes urogenital pathology. The impact of urogenital schistosomiasis during pregnancy on birth outcomes and child growth is poorly understood.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Schistosoma haematobiumzzm321990 ; Zimbabwe; adverse birth outcomes; birthweight; child health; pregnancy; schistosomiasis; stunting; women
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 31832636 PMCID: PMC8064048 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiz664
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Infect Dis ISSN: 0022-1899 Impact factor: 5.226
Figure 1.Selection of women for inclusion in assessment of risk factors for urogenital schistosomiasis during pregnancy and its impact on birth outcomes and child growth. In total, 212 clusters were randomized, 53 in each of the 4 trial arms (SOC, IYCF, WASH, and IYCF + WASH). After randomisation, 1 cluster was excluded because it was in an urban area, 1 was excluded because the village health workers covering it mainly had clients outside the study area, and 2 more were merged on the basis of subsequent data for village health worker coverage, leaving 210 clusters from the original randomisation. Three new cluster designations were created because of anomalies in the original mapping. For 2 of these clusters, the trial group was clear; the third contained areas that were in 2 trial groups, and was assigned to the under-represented group, resulting in 53 clusters in each group. All these changes occurred before enrolment began. When enrolment was completed, there was 1 cluster (SOC) in which no women were enrolled, leaving a total of 211 clusters available for analysis. Infant follow-up was lower at the 1-month than the 18-month visit due to cultural practice for women (especially primiparous) to return to their parental home during the perinatal period. Mothers of infants with 1-month LAZ were, on average, 1.5 years older and had higher parity than mothers of infants with missing data; no other meaningful differences were observed [22]. Of the 564 mother-infant dyads missing 18-month infant length, 146 were miscarriages, 86 stillbirths, 116 neonatal deaths, and 100 postnatal deaths (78 infant deaths, 11 child deaths, 7 deaths with unknown date of death, 2 deaths with unknown date of birth, and 2 deaths after 18 months). Abbreviations: AGA, appropriate for gestational age; IYCF, infant and young child feeding; SGA, small for gestational age; SOC, standard of care; WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.
Characteristics of Women Enrolled in the Study of Risk Factors for Urogenital Schistosomiasis During Pregnancy and Effects on Birth and Child Health Outcomes
| Characteristic (n = 4437a) | Value |
|---|---|
| Maternal factors | |
| Parity, median (IQR) | 2 (1–3) |
| Years of education, median (IQR) | 10 (9–11) |
| Age of mother, y, median (IQR) | 25.5 (20.5–31.2) |
| Age category,b n (%) | |
| Above 15 y | 4165 (99.5) |
| 15 y and younger | 22 (0.5) |
| Employed, n (%) | |
| Yes | 379 (8.7) |
| No | 3973 (91.3) |
| Married, n (%) | |
| Yes | 4008 (95.5) |
| No | 188 (4.5) |
| Religion, n (%) | |
| Apostolic | 1967 (46.6) |
| Other Christiansc | 1902 (45.0) |
| Other religions | 355 (8.4) |
| HIV status, n (%) | |
| Positive | 732 (16.5) |
| Negative | 3687 (83.1) |
| Unknown | 18 (0.4) |
| Household factors | |
| Household wealth, n (%) | |
| Lowest quintile | 877 (20.1) |
| Second quintile | 878 (20.1) |
| Middle quintile | 875 (20.1) |
| Fourth quintile | 866 (19.8) |
| Highest quintile | 869 (19.9) |
| Household size, median (IQR) | 5 (3–6) |
| WASH factors | |
| Median 1-way walk time to fetch water, min, median (IQR) | 10 (5–20) |
| Drinking water, n (%) | |
| Improved | 2703 (62.7) |
| Not improved | 1605 (37.3) |
| Any latrine, n (%) | |
| Yes | 1548 (36.0) |
| No | 2755 (64.0) |
| Improved latrine, n (%) | |
| Yes | 1355 (31.5) |
| No | 2943 (68.5) |
| Handwashing station, n (%) | |
| Yes | 376 (9.2) |
| No | 3702 (90.8) |
| Water available at handwashing station, n (%) | |
| Yes | 126 (3.1) |
| No | 3942 (96.9) |
| Environmental factors | |
| Minimum temperature, °C, median (IQR) | 11.7 (11.6–11.8) |
| Maximum temperature, °C, median (IQR) | 25.8 (25.6–25.9) |
| Mean rainfall, mm, median (IQR) | 595.9 (587.4–602.7) |
| Season at enrolment, n (%) | |
| Rainy | 1581 (35.8) |
| Cold | 1352 (30.6) |
| Hot and dry | 1488 (33.7) |
| Field office/hub, n (%) | |
| Chirumanzu district | |
| Mvuma | 983 (22.2) |
| St Theresa | 1096 (24.7) |
| Shurugwi district | |
| Shurugwi | 1416 (31.9) |
| Tongogara | 942 (21.2) |
Abbreviation: HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; IQR, interquartile range; SHINE, Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy Study; WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.
aAll women enrolled in SHINE with baseline urine microscopy to detect Schistosoma haematobium eggs, known HIV status, and known pregnancy outcome.
bChildren aged 5–15 years are eligible for inclusion in Zimbabwean national mass antihelminthic drug administration programs, which were conducted annually in SHINE study districts. Pregnant girls are excluded from the mass drug administration programs.
cOther Christians include: Protestants, Pentecostals, Catholics, and other Christian groups.
Figure 2.Prevalence of urogenital schistosomiasis among pregnant women in rural Zimbabwe by cluster and month of recruitment. The prevalence of (A) egg-positive women (n = 4437) and (B) hematuria-positive women (n = 4298) within each cluster (the catchment area of 1–4 village health workers). The 4 Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) study hubs (Mvuma, St. Theresa, Shurugwi, and Tongogara) are indicated by green stars; samples from each cluster were processed at the nearest hub. C, The percentage prevalence of egg-positive and hematuria-positive urine samples among pregnant women by month of recruitment to the SHINE study; frequency of participants with available parasitology and urinalysis data is indicated for each month under the graph. SHINE cluster-adjusted upper and lower 95% confidence intervals for prevalence estimates are indicated by dashed lines.
Multivariable Generalized Estimating Equation Logistic Regression Analysis of Risk Factors for Being Schistosoma haematobium Egg-Positive or Hematuria-Positive Among Pregnant Women
| Factor | Multivariable GEE Logistic Regression Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Hematuria-Positive (n = 4298) | |||
| Adjusted ORa,b (95% CI) |
| Adjusted ORa,c (95% CI) |
| |
| Maternal factors | ||||
| Education | 0.94 (.89–1.00) | .034 | 0.94 (.90–.98) | .003 |
| Age of mother | 0.94 (.92– .96) | <.001 | 0.97 (.95–.98) | <.001 |
| Religion | ||||
| Apostolic | 1.00 | |||
|
| 0.82 (.64– 1.05) | .115 | ||
|
| 1.03 (.72– 1.46) | .886 | ||
| WASH factors | ||||
| Improved latrine | ||||
|
| 1.00 | |||
|
| 1.30 (1.10–1.54) | .002 | ||
| Improved drinking water | ||||
|
| 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
|
| 1.27 (1.03– 1.57) | .023 | 1.21 (1.02–1.44) | .029 |
| Environmental factors | ||||
| Study hub | ||||
| Chirumanzu district | ||||
|
| 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
|
| 1.23 (.84–1.78) | .284 | 0.80 (.62–1.04) | .098 |
| Shurugwi district | ||||
|
| 1.68 (1.22–2.30) | .001 | 1.99 (1.53–2.57) | <.001 |
|
| 1.24 (.87–1.76) | .234 | 1.20 (.92–1.57) | .169 |
| Season at enrolment | ||||
|
| 1.00 | |||
|
| 1.19 (.99–1.44) | .067 | ||
|
| 1.38 (1.14–1.67) | .001 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; GEE, generalized estimating equation; OR, odds ratio; WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.
aAdjusted for: all other factors included in the multivariable model; variables associated with egg and/or hematuria status at P < .25 in univariable GEE (Supplementary Table 2) were entered into multivariable GEE.
bOdds of being positive for ≥1 S. haematobium egg per 10mL urine.
cOdds of being positive for hematuria.
dOther Christians include: Protestants, Pentecostals, Catholics, and other Christian groups.
Multivariable Zero-Inflated β Regression Analysis of Risk Factors for High Schistosoma haematobium Infection Intensity Among Pregnant Women
| Factor | Zero-Inflated Negative Binomial Model | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Odds of Egg Negative (n = 4437) | Infection Intensity (n = 4430a) | |||
| Adjusted ORb, c (95% CI) |
| IRR (95% CI) |
| |
| Maternal factors | ||||
| Parity | 0.99 (.85–1.15) | .888 | 0.95 (.82–1.10) | .483 |
| Years of education | 1.06 (.98–1.14) | .166 | ||
| Age | 1.07 (1.03–1.11) | .001 | ||
| Marital status | ||||
| Married | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Not married | 1.52 (.55–4.22) | .420 | 2.91 (1.06–8.04) | .039 |
| Religion | ||||
| Apostolic | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Other Christiansd | 1.45 (1.04–2.04) | .031 | 1.41 (.93–2.14) | .104 |
| Other religions | 0.97 (.56–1.69) | .914 | 1.14 (.68–1.91) | .614 |
| Household factors | ||||
| Household wealth | ||||
| Lowest quintile | 1.00 | |||
| Second | 0.93 (.61–1.41) | .720 | ||
| Middle | 1.36 (.84–2.20) | .207 | ||
| Fourth | 1.16 (.75–1.79) | .498 | ||
| Highest quintile | 1.23 (.70–2.18) | .476 | ||
| WASH factors | ||||
| Any latrine | ||||
| Yes | 1.00 | |||
| No | 0.83 (.41–1.69) | .606 | ||
| Improved latrine | ||||
| Yes | 1.00 | |||
| No | 1.07 (.51–2.22) | .863 | ||
| Improved drinking water | ||||
| Yes | 1.00 | |||
| No | 0.81 (.61–1.07) | .143 | ||
| Environmental factors | ||||
| Minimum temperature | 0.79 (.21–2.91) | .722 | ||
| Study hub | ||||
| Chirumanzu district | ||||
| Mvuma | 1.00 | |||
| St Theresa | 0.77 (.47–1.25) | .285 | 0.75 (.39–1.44) | .384 |
| Shurugwi district | ||||
| Shurugwi | 0.48 (.30–.75) | .001 | 0.45 (.25–.80) | .007 |
| Tongogara | 0.73 (.45–1.20) | .217 | 1.04 (.50–2.21) | .891 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; IRR, incidence risk ratio; OR, odds ratio; WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.
aSeven participants had known schistosomiasis status but unknown infection intensity.
bAdjusted for all other factors included in the multivariable model; variables associated with infection at P < .25 in univariable GEE (Supplementary Table 3) were entered into multivariable models.
cOdds of being negative for S. haematobium eggs in urine.
dOther Christians include: Protestants, Pentecostals, Catholics, and other Christian groups.
Effect of Maternal Urogenital Schistosomiasis During Pregnancy on Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes and Neonatal Deaths
| Adverse outcomea | Egg-Positive | Hematuria-Positive | Egg and/or Hematuria-Positive | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Miscarriageb | 0.75 (.39–1.45) | .395 | 0.80 (.40–1.57) | .513 | 0.73 (.45–1.18) | .195 | 0.76 (.46–1.26) | .291 | 0.75 (.47–1.20) | .234 | 0.79 (.49–1.29) | .348 |
| Stillbirthc | 0.71 (.22–2.32) | .572 | 0.67 (.20–2.23) | .519 | 1.06 (.55–2.01) | .869 | 1.11 (.57–2.16) | .757 | 1.09 (.59–2.01) | .792 | 1.12 (.60–2.10) | .713 |
| SGA termb | 1.30 (.92–1.84) | .144 | 1.28 (.88–1.85) | .195 | 1.20 (.94–1.54) | .153 | 1.12 (.86–1.45) | .402 | 1.13 (.89–1.44) | .320 | 1.07 (.83–1.38) | .599 |
| SGA pretermb | 5.31 (1.05–26.77) | .043 | 3.14 (.58–17.05) | .185 | 1.63 (.57–4.69) | .365 | 2.06 (.60–7.13) | .252 | 2.50 (.81–7.67) | .109 | 3.16 (.81–12.24) | .097 |
| AGA pretermd | 0.93 (.66–1.29) | .654 | 0.86 (.66–1.12) | .262 | 0.84 (.65–1.09) | .181 | ||||||
| Neonatal deathd | 0.77 (.28–2.13) | .618 | 0.72 (.32–1.60) | .413 | 0.84 (.39–1.77) | .639 |
Abbreviations: AGA, appropriate for gestational age; CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio; SGA, small for gestational age.
aAll cases and controls were matched on maternal HIV status, gestational age at the baseline visit (±2 weeks) and SHINE study arm; for stillbirth, neonatal death, SGA and preterm outcomes, cases and controls were also matched on infant sex.
bAdjusted for maternal age.
cAdjusted for field office/hub.
dUnadjusted.
Effect of Urogenital Schistosomiasis During Pregnancy on Birthweight and Postnatal Child Linear Growth
| Health Outcome | Egg-Positive | Hematuria-Positive | Egg and/or Hematuria-Positive | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted Coeff (95% CI) |
| Adjusted Coeffa (95% CI) |
| Unadjusted Coeff (95% CI) |
| Adjusted Coeffa (95% CI) |
| Unadjusted Coeff (95% CI) |
| Adjusted Coeffa (95% CI) |
| |
| Birthweight, g | −0.05 (−.01 to .02) | .060 | −0.04 (−.09 to .01) | .090 | −0.01 (−.05 to .02) | .452 | 0.00 (−.04 to .03) | .835 | −0.02 (−.05 to .02) | .353 | −0.01 (−.04 to .03) | .741 |
| 1-month LAZ | 0.12 (−.08 to .32) | .254 | 0.12 (−.09 to .33) | .250 | −0.06 (−.20 to .07) | .359 | −0.06 (−.20 to .08) | .379 | −0.03 (−.17 to .10) | .618 | −0.03 (−.16 to .11) | .709 |
| 18-month LAZ | −0.07 (−.18 to .05) | .263 | −0.04 (−.16 to .09) | .563 | −0.05 (−.14 to .04) | .277 | −0.01 (−.10 to .08) | .851 | −0.05 (−.14 to .03) | .239 | −0.02 (−.10 to .07) | .716 |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted ORa (95% CI) |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted ORa (95% CI) |
| Unadjusted OR (95% CI) |
| Adjusted ORa (95% CI) |
| |
| Low birthweight | 1.32 (.91–1.92) | .145 | 1.26 (.85–1.86) | .258 | 1.08 (.79–1.48) | .613 | 1.00 (.72–1.38) | .978 | 1.13 (.84–1.51) | .433 | 1.04 (.77–1.42) | .781 |
| 1-month stunted | 0.72 (.45–1.14) | .162 | 0.69 (.43–1.11) | .124 | 0.99 (.74–1.33) | .958 | 1.00 (.74–1.35) | .990 | 1.00 (.75–1.32) | .975 | 0.99 (.74–1.33) | .944 |
| 18-month stunted | 1.03 (.81–1.31) | .794 | 0.97 (.75–1.25) | .799 | 1.08 (.90–1.30) | .422 | 1.00 (.83–1.19) | .930 | 1.09 (.92–1.30) | .303 | 1.02 (.86–1.21) | .844 |
Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Coeff, coefficient; IYCF, infant and young child feeding; LAZ, length-for-age Z scores; OR, odds ratio; WASH, water, sanitation, and hygiene.
aAdjusted for maternal age, maternal HIV status, and Sanitation Hygiene Infant Nutrition Efficacy (SHINE) study arm (standard of care, IYCF, WASH, and IYCF + WASH).