| Literature DB >> 31832314 |
Min Li1,2, Lian Shen1,2, Liqiao Jing1,2,3, Su Xu4, Bin Zheng1,2, Xiao Lin5, Yihao Yang5, Zuojia Wang6, Hongsheng Chen1,2.
Abstract
Metamaterials/metasurfaces, which have subwavelength resonating unit cells (i.e., meta-atoms), can enable unprecedented control over the flow of light. Despite their significant progress, achieving dynamical control of both energy and momentum of light remains a challenge. Here, a mechanically tunable metawall capable of either absorbing light energy or modulating light momentum, by incorporating the magnetic meta-atoms into a 3D printed origami grating, is theoretically designed and experimentally realized. Through mechanical stretching or compressing of the Miura-ori pattern, the function of metawall can transit from an absorber, a mirror, to a negative reflector. Particularly, the continuously geometric deformation of the Miura-ori lattice is a promising approach to compensate the angular dispersion in gradient metasurfaces. Considering the prominent mechanical properties and strong deformation abilities of origami structures, the findings may open an alternative avenue toward lightweight and deployable metadevices with diversified and continuously alterable electromagnetic properties.Entities:
Keywords: metamaterials; optical transition; origami; reconfigurable
Year: 2019 PMID: 31832314 PMCID: PMC6891917 DOI: 10.1002/advs.201901434
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Sci (Weinh) ISSN: 2198-3844 Impact factor: 16.806
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the reconfigurable metawall with a Miura‐ori pattern. Under external mechanical stimuli, the metawall could be switched freely between various deformation: absorber at the unfolded geometry (state 1), mirror (state 2) at minor folding angles, and polarization‐conversion negative reflector (state 3) at large folding angles. Mirror does not change the incident momentum (), while negative reflector provides a reversed momentum (P) to the incident one and results in negative reflection.
Figure 2Underlying mechanism of the optical transition in the metawall. Demonstration of the induced magnetic currents located over a ground plane for a) 2D metawall and b) 3D metawall. Red and blue arrows represent the induced magnetic currents of the first and second dipoles. The inset show the 2D planar and 3D folded origami metawall. Reflectance of propagating modes versus frequency for c) 2D metawall and d) 3D metawall folded into 63°. The corresponding reflected electric field distribution are plotted in (e) and (f). Dashed arrow in each panel represents incident TE plane wave with oblique incident angle θin = 40°, while solid arrow in (f) represents the reflected TM plane wave with reflection angle θ = −69.5°.
Figure 3Function of metawall transits from an absorber, a mirror, to a negative reflector. a) Reflection amplitudes of TE00 and TM(−1)0 under various folding angles. b) Absorption of the metawall versus folding angles. c) Simulated results of the scattered intensity versus reflection angle at different folding states. Right panel shows the scattering spectra with the folding angle at θ = 0°, 20°, 55°, and 62°. d) Measured reflection intensity versus reflection angle with the metawall tuned to 0°, 10°, 50°, and 62°, respectively.
Figure 4Negative reflection at a fixed reflection angle. a) Schematic illustration of reflection upon a gradient metasurface and the proposed metawall. The gradient metasurface adds a constant momentum to the incident light thus the reflection momentum () varies with incident angle, whereas the metawall provides adaptive momentum to guarantee the reflection momentum is independent on the incident angle and negative reflection at a fixed outgoing angle is realized. b) Reflection amplitude and incident angle versus the folding state. In simulations, the reflection angle is fixed at −49.3° and this value is revised to −53° in experiments for the sake of slight redshift of the operating frequency. c) Simulated scattering properties under different incident angles. d) Reflection angle for ideal and practical cases versus folding state. Measured reflection intensity versus reflection directions with incident angle at: e) 26.2°, 29.5°, 32.2°, and f) 36°, 41.7°, and 56.8°.