Literature DB >> 3183210

Recognition of low-level alcohol intoxication from speech signal.

F Klingholz1, R Penning, E Liebhardt.   

Abstract

Eleven male subjects were required to read a text in both sober and alcohol intoxicated conditions. By means of statistical signal analysis, frequency distributions of fundamental frequency (F0), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), ratio of first- to second-formant frequencies (F1/F2), variation speed of the frequencies F0, F1, F2, and the long-term average spectrum (LTAS) were determined. The distributions were examined for their suitability in discriminating between sober and intoxicated conditions. The SNR and F0 distributions as well as the LTAS discriminated with an error rate less than 5%. Combination of SNR and F0 profiles enabled correct discrimination in all cases. The parameter F1/F2 describing the articulation varied strongly among individuals. It was modified only with high levels of blood alcohol. Frequency variation speeds were not altered by intoxication. Speaker recognition by means of LTAS was interpreted as a perturbation of laryngeal movement control, where long-term voice effort was found to produce similar effects to alcohol intoxication. On the basis of the present results and various other factors (ambiguity of the sources of the acoustic effects, expense of the procedure), application of acoustic analysis in forensic medicine for recognition of low-level alcohol intoxication is considered inexpedient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3183210     DOI: 10.1121/1.396661

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  6 in total

1.  The effect of alcohol on speech production.

Authors:  Eszter Tisljár-Szabó; Renáta Rossu; Veronika Varga; Csaba Pléh
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-12

2.  Do voice recordings reveal whether a person is intoxicated? A case study.

Authors:  K Johnson; D B Pisoni; R H Bernacki
Journal:  Phonetica       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.759

3.  NOVEL SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE OF INTOXICATION: ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS OF VOICE RECORDINGS FROM THE EXXON VALDEZ.

Authors:  J Alexander Tanford; David B Pisoni; Keith Johnson
Journal:  J Crim Law Criminol       Date:  1991

4.  Amphetamine analogs methamphetamine and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) differentially affect speech.

Authors:  Gina F Marrone; Jennifer S Pardo; Robert M Krauss; Carl L Hart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Drinking songs: alcohol effects on learned song of zebra finches.

Authors:  Christopher R Olson; Devin C Owen; Andrey E Ryabinin; Claudio V Mello
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Voice Stress Analysis: A New Framework for Voice and Effort in Human Performance.

Authors:  Martine Van Puyvelde; Xavier Neyt; Francis McGlone; Nathalie Pattyn
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-11-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.