| Literature DB >> 31832027 |
Hafiz Muhammad Asif1, Abdul Hayee1, Muhammad Rahil Aslam1, Khalil Ahmad1, Abdul Sattar Hashmi1.
Abstract
The present work was carried out to assess the Onosma bracteatum anxiolytic and antidepressant properties. Swiss albino mice (male) were fed orally with hydroalcoholic extract at different doses 50, 100, and 200 mg 1 hour prior to test with the standard diazepam and fluoxetine. Anxiolytic and antidepressant activities were evaluated by using open field, elevated plus maze, force swimming, and tail suspension test. Results of open field test showed an increase in number of line crossing as well as number of rearing in dosage-dependent design. Although results of elevated plus maze test evidently showed antianxiety effect of O bracteatum by increasing the time spent in open arms along with decreasing the time spent in closed arms in dosage-dependent way. For the evaluation of antidepressant effect, O bracteatum diminished the immobility time and expanded mobility time in forced swim model in dosage-dependent way. Likewise, O bracteatum expanded time span of mobility along with diminished immobility time in tail suspension method in dosage-dependent way. Outcome demonstrated that plant at the dose of 200 mg/kg body weight showed significant potential which was similar to that standard diazepam and fluoxetine. Hence, O bracteatum may be used as potent natural psychotherapeutic agent against the mental disorders.Entities:
Keywords: Onosma bracteatum; antidepressant; anxiolytic; elevated plus maze; force swim; open field; tail suspension test
Year: 2019 PMID: 31832027 PMCID: PMC6891010 DOI: 10.1177/1559325819891262
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dose Response ISSN: 1559-3258 Impact factor: 2.658
The Effects of the Crude Extracts of Onosma bracteatum on Number of Line Crossings and Rearings on Open Field Test and on Time Spent in Open Arms and Time Spent in Closed Arms in Elevated Plus Maze Model.a
| Group | Open Field Test | Elevated Plus Maze Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of Line Crossing | Number of Rearing | Time Spent in Open Arms (s) | Time Spent in Closed Arms (s) | |
| Control (N/S 10 mL/kg) | 87.16 ± 7.0 (NS) | 34.12 ± 13 (NS) | 32.14 ± 3.05 (NS) | 262.19 ± 3.11 (NS) |
| Standard (DZP 1 mg/kg) | 133.83 ± 9.10b | 59.02 ± 10b | 104 ± 8.14b | 191.5 ± 8.99b |
|
| 87.1 ± 3.2 (NS) | 34.12 ± 8.0 (NS) | 50.49 ± 5 (NS) | 243.81 ± 5.1 (NS) |
|
| 98.99 ± 6.96 (NS) | 42 ± 5.2 (NS) | 74.5 ± 5.43c | 220 ± 5.79c |
|
| 116.90 ± 7.8c | 49 ± 6.5c | 91.5 ± 6.41d | 203.5 ± 6.24d |
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; DZP, diazepam; NS, normal saline; SEM, standard error of the mean.
a The data are expressed as mean ± SEM of 6 creatures in each gathering. The outcomes are examined utilizing 1-way ANOVA and contrasted with those of normal control gathering.
b The outcomes are viewed as exceptionally significant, if P < .001.
c The outcomes are viewed as noteworthy, if P < .05.
d The outcomes are viewed as increasingly significant, if P < .01.
The Effects of the Crude Extracts of Onosma Bracteatum on Duration(s) of Mobility and Immobility in Forced Swim Model and in Tail Suspension Model.a
| Group | Forced Swim Model | Tail Suspension Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Duration of Mobility(s) | Duration of Immobility(s) | Duration of Mobility(s) | Duration of Immobility(s) | |
| Control (N/S 10 mL/kg) | 138.4 ± 8.6 (NS) | 161.6 ± 8.6 (NS) | 66.50 ± 7.14 (NS) | 233.5 ± 7.14 (NS) |
| Fluoxetine (FXT 1 mg/kg) | 247.1 ± 5.90b | 52.9 ± 5.90b | 223.4 ± 3.45b | 76.6 ± 3.45b |
|
| 167.4 ± 4.32c | 132.6 ± 4.32c | 120.9 ± 5.20 (NS) | 179.1 ± 5.20 (NS) |
|
| 195.5 ± 4.79d | 104.5 ± 4.79d | 141.8 ± 6.14c | 158.2 ± 6.14c |
|
| 224.1 ± 4.49b | 75.9 ± 4.49b | 167.1 ± 7.01d | 132.9 ± 7.01d |
Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance; NS, normal saline; SEM, standard error of the mean.
a The values are communicated as mean ± SEM of 6 creatures in each gathering. The outcomes are examined utilizing 1-way ANOVA and contrasted with those of normal control gathering.
b The outcomes are viewed as exceptionally significant, if P < .001.
c The outcomes are viewed as noteworthy, if P < .05.
d The outcomes are viewed as increasingly significant, if P < .01.