| Literature DB >> 31831851 |
Petra Frýdlová1,2, Jana Mrzílková3,2, Martin Šeremeta3,2, Jan Křemen3,2, Jan Dudák4, Jan Žemlička4, Pavel Němec1, Petr Velenský5, Jiří Moravec6, Daniel Koleška7, Veronika Zahradníčková1, Tomáš Jirásek8, Petr Kodym9, Daniel Frynta10, Petr Zach3,2.
Abstract
Squamate reptiles are considered to exhibit indeterminate growth. Nevertheless, current literature disputes the available definitions of this growth type, presents new theoretical models, and questions its universality in cold-blooded vertebrates. We have followed up on our previous research employing micro-CT to explore growth plate cartilage (GPC) in the epiphysis of long bones, which is responsible for longitudinal skeletal growth by the endochondral ossification process. We focused on numerous and highly diversified group of the Iguania clade comprising Acrodonta (agamas and chameleons) and Pleurodonta ("iguanas"). We recorded the absence of GPC in most of the examined adult Pleurodonta specimens and interpret it as an irreversible arrest of skeletal growth. This finding clearly rejects the universality of indeterminate growth in lizards. On the other hand, we found apparent GPC preservation in most of the adult specimens belonging to Acrodonta. This suggests a preserved ability to continue body growth throughout most of their life. We discuss the uncovered disparity between Acrodonta and Pleurodonta and emphasize the importance of GPC degradation timing.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31831851 PMCID: PMC6908584 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54573-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Phylogenetic pattern of the growth plate cartilage (GPC) across Iguania. Visualization of GPC presence (green) and absence (black) within the Iguania clade comprising Acrodonta (agamas and chameleons) and Pleurodonta (“iguanas”). Reconstruction of ancestral states was done using the parsimony method implemented in Mesquite (Maddison and Maddison 2015). Monitor lizards (Varanidae), the beaded lizard (Helodermatidae) and Chinese crocodile lizard (Shinisauridae) were used as outgroup (Anguimorpha).
Figure 2Visualisation of proximal part of the femur by micro-CT. Frontal cross-section of the proximal part of the femur. The epiphyseal growth plate is present in adult Uromastyx ornatus (a) and completely absent in adult old Chamaeleo calyptratus. (b) Abbreviations: Epiphysis (Epi), Metaphysis (Met), Diaphysis (Dia), Suture (Sut), Epiphyseal growth plate (asterisk).
Epiphyseal state in the proximal epiphysis of the femur in the examined species of the Iguania clade.
| Family | Species | GPC | SVL | SVLrel | Sex | Age | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agamidae | + | 131.5 | 78.7 | A | CUNI | ||
| + | 132.1 | 95.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 89.7 | 76.7 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 138.0 | 100.7 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 138.0 | 101.0 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 140.0 | 102.4 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 115.0 | 84.1 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 125.0 | 91.4 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 105.0 | 76.8 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| ± | 129.0 | 94.4 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 70.0 | 68.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 72.1 | 84.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 279.8 | 84.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 234.0 | 92.1 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 166.0 | 54.6 | A | NMP | |||
| − | 135.0 | 75.9 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 104.6 | 82.7 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 113.0 | 65.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 165.0 | 82.5 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| − | 222.0 | 88.8 | A | NMP | |||
| − | 227.0 | 113.5 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 178.0 | 71.2 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 215.0 | 86.4 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 211.0 | 97.7 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 285.0 | 98.3 | A (>30) | CUNI | |||
| − | 255.0 | 87.9 | A (28) | CUNI | |||
| + | 180.0 | 71.1 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| + | 189.0 | 74.7 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 105.0 | 41.5 | SA | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 120.0 | 47.4 | SA | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 71.0 | 28.1 | SA | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 250.0 | 66.7 | A (5) | CUNI | |||
| + | 173.0 | 99.4 | A | Z. Dubeč | |||
| + | 168.0 | 96.6 | A | Z. Dubeč | |||
| ± | 177.0 | 107.3 | A | Z. Ústí | |||
| + | 150.0 | 76.5 | A | Z. Ústí | |||
| + | 140.0 | 71.4 | A | Z. Ústí | |||
| + | 184.8 | 94.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| Corytophanidae | − | 170.6 | 101.5 | A | CUNI | ||
| − | 110.8 | 88.6 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 133.0 | 95.0 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| − | 112.0 | 80.0 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| − | 129.0 | 92.1 | A (12) | CUNI | |||
| + | 85 | 85 | A | CUNI | |||
| Crotaphytidae | ± | 85.0 | 78.6 | A | Z. Dubeč | ||
| + | 76.0 | 70.2 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 85.0 | 89.6 | A | CUNI | |||
| Dactyloidae | − | 55.0 | 73.3 | A | CUNI | ||
| − | 60.0 | 80.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 80.0 | 80.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 74.0 | 74.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 116.0 | 74.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 146.0 | 84.9 | A | Z. Dubeč | |||
| − | 141.0 | 91.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 133.0 | 85.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 123.0 | 72.4 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 86.0 | 54.8 | SA | CUNI | |||
| + | 58.0 | 34.1 | SA | CUNI | |||
| − | 135.0 | 86.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 77.0 | 96.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 65.0 | 81.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 58.0 | 91.2 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 42.0 | 52.5 | SA | CUNI | |||
| − | 65.0 | 91.5 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 115.0 | 67.6 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 160.0 | 84.2 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 135.0 | 79.4 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 95.0 | 86.6 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| − | 48.0 | 80.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 122.0 | 75.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 69.0 | 40.1 | SA | CUNI | |||
| + | 50.0 | 30.9 | SA | CUNI | |||
| + | 47.0 | 27.3 | SA | CUNI | |||
| + | 57.8 | 67.2 | SA | CUNI | |||
| − | 71.0 | 82.6 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 49.1 | 87.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 160.0 | 84.2 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 117.0 | 70.9 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 99.0 | 79.5 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 57.0 | 67.1 | SA | CUNI | |||
| Chamaeleonidae | + | 69.0 | 82.1 | A | CUNI | ||
| + | 42.0 | 104.6 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 36.0 | 90.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 126.0 | 80.3 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 104.0 | 77.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 95.0 | 70.4 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 215.0 | 93.1 | A (>6) | Z. Zájezd | |||
| − | 183.0 | 79.2 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 97.0 | 88.2 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 110.0 | 100.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 205.0 | 76.0 | A (>2.5) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 225.0 | 83.4 | A (2) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 215.0 | 79.7 | A (>2) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 175.0 | 79.3 | A (>2) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 170.0 | 77.0 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| − | 232.0 | 86.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 198.0 | 89.7 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| ± | 192.0 | 87.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 175.0 | 70.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 179.0 | 71.6 | A (>4.5) | CUNI | |||
| + | 120.0 | 105.9 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 157.0 | 52.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 205.1 | 68.4 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 207.0 | 69.0 | A (4) | CUNI | |||
| ± | 200.9 | 67.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 85.0 | 56.7 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 143.0 | 95.3 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 91.0 | 60.7 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 60.0 | 40.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 95.0 | 72.5 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 44.0 | 58.7 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 120.0 | 72.7 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 120.0 | 75.9 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 72.0 | 78.3 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 83.0 | 83.0 | A (3) | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 104.0 | 78.8 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 82.0 | 66.7 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 106.0 | 78.5 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 190.0 | 69.6 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 257.8 | 89.5 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 101.0 | 109.0 | A (2) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 95.0 | 114.5 | A (2) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 69.0 | 83.1 | A | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 70.0 | 94.6 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 80.0 | 108.1 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| + | 67.0 | 90.5 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| Iguanidae | − | 450.0 | 121.6 | A (21) | NMP | ||
| + | 304.0 | 82.2 | A | Z. Dubeč | |||
| + | 412.1 | 79.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 114.0 | 80.3 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 450.0 | 118.4 | A | NMP | |||
| − | 420.0 | 110.5 | A (>23) | Z. Prague | |||
| − | 175.0 | 83.3 | A (>6) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 410.0 | 107.9 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 195.0 | 92.9 | A (>8) | Z. Prague | |||
| − | 180.0 | 90.0 | A (>10) | Z. Prague | |||
| + | 138.0 | 69.0 | A | Z. Zájezd | |||
| Leiocephalidae | − | 122.0 | 91.6 | A | Z. Dubeč | ||
| − | 123.0 | 92.3 | A | Z. Dubeč | |||
| − | 85.0 | 73.4 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 101.0 | 75.8 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 74.0 | 86.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| − | 64.5 | 75.0 | A | CUNI | |||
| + | 88.0 | 91.7 | A | CUNI | |||
| Opluridae | ± | 131.5 | 85.5 | A | CUNI | ||
| − | 92.0 | 74.8 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| − | 118.0 | 84.8 | A | Z. Pilsen | |||
| Phrynosomatidae | − | 89.9 | 105.8 | A | CUNI | ||
| Tropiduridae | + | 68.0 | 60.0 | SA | CUNI | ||
| + | 72.0 | 63.5 | SA | CUNI | |||
| − | 78.0 | 68.8 | A | CUNI |
Growth plate cartilage (GPC) presence (+), absence (−), and process of degradation (±), Snout-Vent Length (SVL) in millimetres, SVLrel is relative SVL (in % of maximal SVL from the literature; for references see SI8), Sex and Age in years, where known.
Abbreviations: Male (M), Female (F), Adult (A), Subadult (SA), Charles University (CUNI), National Museum (NMP), Zoo (Z), Private Breeders (PB).
Catalogue numbers of specimens from National Museum, Prague: Physignathus cocincinus (NMP-P6V 75130); Intellagama lesueurii (NMP-P6j-29/96); Iguana iguana (NMP-P6V 71313).
Figure 3Relationship between growth plate cartilage state and body size. The presence (+GPC:1) and absence (• GPC:0) of growth plate cartilage (GPC) in agamas (a), chameleons (b), and Pleurodonta (c) plotted with respect to body size (SVL) and size relative to maximum SVL reported in the literature (SVLrel). This allows to check for the relationship between the state of GPC and body size (SVL) of the studied species, as well as between the state of GPC and the percent of attained maximal body size (SVLrel in %).
GLM and PGLMM model of the relationship between the growth plate cartilage persistence, clade and body size.
| Df | Deviance | Df | Resid. Deviance | p-value GLM | p-value PGLMM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clade | 1 | 21.28 | 65 | 71.23 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
| SVL | 1 | 11.342 | 64 | 59.89 | <0.001 | <0.01 |
The generalized linear model exploring the relationship between the growth plate cartilage (GPC) presence/absence and two explanatory variables (Clade coded as Acrodonta versus Pleurodonta and SVL-Snout-Vent Length). Interaction was not significant; binomial distribution, Chi test. The phylogenetic generalized linear mixed model for binary data (PGLMM) revealed similar results, only p-values are presented.