Literature DB >> 31831595

Drip and ship for mechanical thrombectomy within the Neurovascular Network of Southwest Bavaria.

Katharina Feil1, Jan Rémi1, Clemens Küpper1, Moriz Herzberg1, Franziska Dorn1, Wolfgang G Kunz1, Lukas T Rotkopf1, Johanna Heinrich1, Katharina Müller1, Christoph Laub1, Johannes Levin1, Katrin Hüttemann1, Rainer Dabitz1, Robert Müller1, Frank A Wollenweber1, Thomas Pfefferkorn1, Gerhard F Hamann1, Thomas Liebig1, Marianne Dieterich1, Lars Kellert2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine feasibility and safety of stroke care organization within our Neurovascular Network of Southwest Bavaria (NEVAS) in a rural area with distances of up to 100 kilometers, we compared patients who underwent mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in large vessel occlusion admitted directly to our center (direct to center [DTC]) to patients who were transferred for MT via NEVAS (drip and ship [DS]).
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of all MT patients between January 2015 and May 2018. Successful recanalization was defined as a thrombolysis in cerebral infarction score of 2b-3. Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) was defined according to European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study 3. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2 at 3 months indicated good outcome.
RESULTS: MT was performed in 410 patients: 221 DTC and 189 DS. Median NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 16 and premorbid mRS score was 0. Thrombolysis was applied in 62.2% with the same time from symptom onset in both groups (94.5 vs 95 minutes). Successful recanalization (79.3% vs 77.8%) and NIHSS score reduction from admission to discharge (16-7 vs 17-6) were comparable. Time delay from onset to revascularization was 96 minutes in DS (212 vs 308 minutes, p = 0.001). At follow-up, DTC patients had a trend to better outcome (33.5% vs 24.3%, p = 0.056). Neither sICH (6.3% vs 5.9%, p = 0.840) nor mortality (31.2% vs 34.4%, p = 0.387) differed between the groups.
CONCLUSION: DS patients benefit from MT without relevant safety concerns, but with a trend to unfavorable outcome compared to DTC patients. These results suggest that DS is suitable to provide MT in rural areas where DTC is not possible.
© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31831595     DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurology        ISSN: 0028-3878            Impact factor:   9.910


  4 in total

Review 1.  Acute ischemic stroke treatment model for Poland in the mechanical thrombectomy era - which way to go?

Authors:  Krzysztof Pawłowski; Artur Dziadkiewicz; Jacek Klaudel; Alicja Mączkowiak; Marek Szołkiewicz
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2022-04-11       Impact factor: 1.065

2.  Inter-hospital transfer for mechanical thrombectomy within the supraregional stroke network NEVAS.

Authors:  Katharina Feil; Jan Rémi; Clemens Küpper; Moriz Herzberg; Franziska Dorn; Wolfgang G Kunz; Paul Reidler; Johannes Levin; Katrin Hüttemann; Steffen Tiedt; Wanja Heidger; Katharina Müller; Dennis C Thunstedt; Rainer Dabitz; Robert Müller; Thomas Pfefferkorn; Gerhard F Hamann; Thomas Liebig; Marianne Dieterich; Lars Kellert
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Optimizing Patient Selection for Interhospital Transfer and Endovascular Therapy in Acute Ischemic Stroke: Real-World Data From a Supraregional, Hub-and-Spoke Neurovascular Network in Germany.

Authors:  Maria-Ioanna Stefanou; Vera Stadler; Dominik Baku; Florian Hennersdorf; Ulrike Ernemann; Ulf Ziemann; Sven Poli; Annerose Mengel
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 4.003

4.  Endovascular treatment for ischemic stroke with the drip-and-ship model-Insights from the German Stroke Registry.

Authors:  Jan Hendrik Schaefer; Natalia Kurka; Fee Keil; Marlies Wagner; Helmuth Steinmetz; Waltraud Pfeilschifter; Ferdinand O Bohmann
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.086

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.