E Singar1, A Burcu2, S Tamer-Kaderli2, Z Yalnız-Akkaya2, S Ozbek-Uzman2, F Ornek2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Sukriye Mahallesi, Ulucanlar Caddesi, No. 89 Altındag, 06340 Ankara, Turkey. Electronic address: evinsingar@yahoo.com. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Ankara Training and Research Hospital, Sukriye Mahallesi, Ulucanlar Caddesi, No. 89 Altındag, 06340 Ankara, Turkey.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To determine the indications, frequency, influential factors and clinical outcomes of resuturing in an atraumatic setting after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent resuturing in the absence of traumatic wound dehiscences after PK between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015 were reviewed. The cases were divided into 2 groups: patients with suture-related problems underwent mandatory resuturing (mandatory group), and patients with post-PK ectasia or a progressive increase in K values and surgically induced astigmatism underwent optional resuturing (Optional group). Patient demographics and surgical indications for PK, reasons for and frequency of resuturing, time between PK and resuturing, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The frequency of resuturing was 9.03% (59 of 633), and the mean age was 39.15±17.80 years. The most common indication for PK was keratoconus (42.4%) and the interval between PK and resuturing ranged from 0.03 to 32 months. The underlying cause leading to resuturing was suture-related problems in 43 eyes (72.9%), development of ectasia or progressive steepening of the K values and surgically induced astigmatism in 16 eyes (27.1%). The mean visual acuity increased, the K value and astigmatism decreased significantly following resuturing in both the mandatory group and the Optional group (P≤0.2). The decrease in astigmatism and K values was more marked in the Optional group, as expected (P≤0.001). CONCLUSION: While resuturing is essential in order to obtain wound integrity in the setting of dehiscence, it is effective in terms of achieving higher visual acuities and lower astigmatism and K values in high astigmatism and post-PK ectasia cases.
PURPOSE: To determine the indications, frequency, influential factors and clinical outcomes of resuturing in an atraumatic setting after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). METHODS: Medical records of all patients who underwent resuturing in the absence of traumatic wound dehiscences after PK between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2015 were reviewed. The cases were divided into 2 groups: patients with suture-related problems underwent mandatory resuturing (mandatory group), and patients with post-PK ectasia or a progressive increase in K values and surgically induced astigmatism underwent optional resuturing (Optional group). Patient demographics and surgical indications for PK, reasons for and frequency of resuturing, time between PK and resuturing, and clinical outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: The frequency of resuturing was 9.03% (59 of 633), and the mean age was 39.15±17.80 years. The most common indication for PK was keratoconus (42.4%) and the interval between PK and resuturing ranged from 0.03 to 32 months. The underlying cause leading to resuturing was suture-related problems in 43 eyes (72.9%), development of ectasia or progressive steepening of the K values and surgically induced astigmatism in 16 eyes (27.1%). The mean visual acuity increased, the K value and astigmatism decreased significantly following resuturing in both the mandatory group and the Optional group (P≤0.2). The decrease in astigmatism and K values was more marked in the Optional group, as expected (P≤0.001). CONCLUSION: While resuturing is essential in order to obtain wound integrity in the setting of dehiscence, it is effective in terms of achieving higher visual acuities and lower astigmatism and K values in high astigmatism and post-PK ectasia cases.