| Literature DB >> 31831076 |
Theresia J Masoi1,2, Stephen M Kibusi3,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Unacceptably high maternal and perinatal mortality remain a major challenge in many low income countries. Early detection and management of danger signs through improved access to maternal services is highly needed for better maternal and infant outcomes. The aim of this study was to test the effectiveness of an interactive mobile messaging alert system on improving knowledge on danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness practices among pregnant women in Dodoma region, Tanzania.Entities:
Keywords: And mHealth; Antenatal care; Birth preparedness; Health information systems; Maternal and child health; Messaging system; Obstetric and newborn danger signs
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31831076 PMCID: PMC6909441 DOI: 10.1186/s12978-019-0838-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Health ISSN: 1742-4755 Impact factor: 3.223
Fig. 1The logical flow diagram which show how this SMS module for two SMS worked
Social demographic characteristics of the participants (N = 450)
| Variable | Intervention | Control | Total/out of 450 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Age | ||||||
| < 20 yrs | 21 | 14.0 | 61 | 20.3 | 82 | 18.2 |
| 20–34 yrs. | 111 | 74.0 | 212 | 70.7 | 323 | 71.8 |
| ≥ 35 yrs | 18 | 12.0 | 27 | 9.0 | 45 | 10.0 |
| Education status | ||||||
| Primary school | 82 | 54.7 | 182 | 60.7 | 264 | 58.7 |
| Secondary school | 52 | 34.7 | 95 | 31.7 | 147 | 32.7 |
| College/University | 16 | 10.6 | 23 | 7.6 | 39 | 8.6 |
| Occupational status | ||||||
| Non-employed | 54 | 36.0 | 90 | 30.0 | 144 | 32.0 |
| Self-employed | 92 | 61.3 | 206 | 68.7 | 298 | 66.2 |
| Employed | 4 | 2.7 | 4 | 1.3 | 8 | 1.8 |
| Marital status | ||||||
| Not married | 25 | 16.7 | 72 | 24.0 | 97 | 21.6 |
| Married | 125 | 83.3 | 228 | 76.0 | 353 | 78.4 |
| Obstetric characteristics of participants | ||||||
| Gravidity | ||||||
| 1 | 33 | 22.0 | 64 | 21.3 | 97 | 21.6 |
| 2–4 | 109 | 72.7 | 217 | 72.3 | 326 | 72.4 |
| ≥ 5 | 8 | 5.3 | 19 | 6.4 | 27 | 6.0 |
| Parity | ||||||
| 1 | 37 | 24.7 | 84 | 28.0 | 121 | 26.9 |
| 2–4 | 107 | 71.3 | 202 | 67.3 | 309 | 68.7 |
| ≥ 5 | 6 | 4.0 | 14 | 4.7 | 20 | 4.4 |
| Gestation age at delivery in weeks | ||||||
| < 37 weeks | 17 | 11.3 | 38 | 12.7 | 55 | 12.2 |
| 37–40 weeks | 116 | 77.4 | 241 | 80.3 | 357 | 79.4 |
| ≥ 40 weeks | 17 | 11.3 | 21 | 7.0 | 38 | 8.4 |
| Gestation age at first visit in weeks | ||||||
| 1–12 weeks | 56 | 37.3 | 136 | 45.3 | 192 | 42.7 |
| 13–20 weeks | 94 | 62.7 | 164 | 54.7 | 258 | 57.3 |
| Age at first pregnancy in years | ||||||
| < 20 yrs | 58 | 38.7 | 156 | 52.0 | 214 | 47.4 |
| 20–34 yrs | 90 | 60.0 | 143 | 47.7 | 234 | 52.0 |
| ≥ 35 yrs | 2 | 1.3 | 1 | 0.3 | 3 | 0.6 |
| Total number of antenatal care visits | ||||||
| 1–3 visits | 14 | 9.3 | 72 | 24.0 | 86 | 19.1 |
| ≥ 4 visits | 136 | 90.7 | 228 | 76.0 | 364 | 80.9 |
The mean score change on danger signs between intervention and controls (N = 450)
| Variables | Control | Intervention | Cohen’s d effect size | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean score (SD) | 95% CI (lower –upper) | Mean score (SD) | 95% CI (lower –upper) | |||
| Knowledge | ||||||
| Pre-test | 4.71 (3.382) | 4.344–5.235 | 4.78 (3.227) | 4.303–5.495 | 0.826 | |
| Post-test | 6.518 (4.304) | 6.145–6.891 | 9.531(2.666) | 9.003–10.059 | 0.000 | 0.85 |
*Ancova test results
Multivariate Linear Regression for Predictors of level of knowledge (N = 45)
| Variables | B | 95% CI lower – upper | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 1.149 | −0.791-3.089 | 0.245 |
| Intervention | 2.910 | 2.199–3.621 | < 0.001 |
| Age of the participants in years | 0.015 | −0.055-085 | 0.672 |
| College/University education | 1.330 | 0.144–2.516 | 0.028 |
| Gestation age at first visit in weeks | − 0.024 | −0.125-0.077 | 0.642 |
| Parity | 0.234 | 0.146–0.615 | 0.227 |
The mean change on birth preparedness practices
| Variables | Control | Intervention | P-value | Cohen’s d effect size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean score (SD) | 95% CI (lower –upper) | Mean score (SD) | 95% CI (lower –upper) | |||
| IBPACR | ||||||
| Pre-test | 1.95(1.205) | 1.736–2.034 | 1.97(1.102) | 1.706–2.264 | 0.887 | |
| Post-test | 2.631 (1.775) | 2.474–2.788 | 4.165 (1.365) | 3.942–4.387 | 0.000 | 0.9 |
*Ancova test results
Predictors of Individual Birth Preparedness (N = 450)
| Variable | B | 95% CI lower – upper | P- value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 0.095 | − 0.651-0840 | 0.803 |
| Intervention | 1.463 | 1.185–1.740 | < 0.001 |
| Age of the participants in years | 0.020 | −0.001-0.042 | 0.059 |
| College/University education | 1.034 | 0.578–1.490 | < 0.001 |
| Gestation age at first visit in weeks | 0.000 | −0.040-0.963 | 0.984 |