| Literature DB >> 31831028 |
Hiroshi Tamura1, Hiroaki Yoshida2, Hiroyuki Kikuchi2, Mai Josaki3, Yumiko Mihara3, Yuichro Shirafuta3, Masahiro Shinagawa3, Isao Tamura3, Toshiaki Taketani3, Akihisa Takasaki4, Norihiro Sugino3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Endometriosis is considered to be the most intractable cause of female infertility. Administering any type of treatment for endometriosis before in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) is an important strategy for improving the IVF-ET outcomes for infertile women with endometriosis. In fact, treatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist just before IVF-ET has been reported to improve the clinical outcome in endometriosis patients. However, the benefit of Dienogest (DNG), a synthetic progestin, treatment just before IVF-ET remains unclear.Entities:
Keywords: Dienogest; Endometriosis; Growing follicle; IVF-ET; Infertile
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31831028 PMCID: PMC6909621 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-019-0597-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ovarian Res ISSN: 1757-2215 Impact factor: 4.234
Fig. 1Schematic representation of the study protocol for the DNG group and control group
In the control group, patients received standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with mid-luteal phase GnRH agonist down-regulation. Nasal spray GnRH agonist was administered from the mid-luteal phase in the previous cycle to the time of HCG injection for the ovulation induction of the IVF-ET cycle. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was initiated from the second day of the IVF-ET cycle by FSH and HMG. In the DNG group, DNG was administered orally every day for 12 weeks from 3 months prior to the IVF-ET cycle. Withdrawal bleeding was induced using E and P. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation was given in a manner similar to that in the control group. GnRH agonist: buserelin acetate 900 mg/day; E: conjugated estrogen; P: dydrogesterone; M: menstruation; FSH: follicle-stimulating hormone; HMG: human menopausal gonadotropin; HCG: human chorionic gonadotropin; OPU: ovum pick-up; DNG: dienogest; dinagest, 2 mg/day.
Fig. 2CONSORT statement flow diagram
Clinical characteristics and IVF-ET data
| Control | DNG | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients (n) | 34 | 30 | |
| Age (years) | 33.6 ± 3.6 | 34.2 ± 3.4 | ns |
| Stage of endometriosis rASRM (III) | 9 | 10 | |
| rASRM (IV) | 5 | 6 | |
| Serum CA125 (U/ml) (before DNG) | – | 44.2 ± 35.3 | |
| Serum CA125 (U/ml) | 26.4 ± 16.8 | 29.1 ± 26.9 | ns |
| Gonadotropin (FSH/HMG) dose (IU) | 1304 ± 338 | 1553 ± 528 | P < 0.05 |
| Estradiol (pg/ml) | 1731 ± 958 | 1288 ± 1091 | P < 0.05 |
| Progesterone (ng/ml) | 1.11 ± 1.14 | 1.72 ± 2.0 | ns |
| Follicles ≥15 mm (n) | 6.5 ± 4.2 | 4.6 ± 3.2 | P < 0.05 |
IVF-ET In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, DNG Dienogest
IVF-ET data and clinical outcomes
| Control ( | DNG ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Oocytes retrieved (n) | 7.5 ± 4.2 | 5.0 ± 3.6 | |
| Mature oocytes (n) | 6.6 ± 3.9 | 4.1 ± 3.1 | |
| Fertilized oocytes (n) | 5.0 ± 3.2 | 2.8 ± 2.8 | |
| Fertilization rate (%) | 68.0 ± 23.4 | 53.7 ± 33.0 | |
| Blastocysts (n) | 3.9 ± 2.9 | 1.5 ± 1.7 | |
| Embryos transferred (n) | 68 | 44 | |
| Gestational sacs (n) | 24 | 11 | |
| Implantation rate (%) | 35.3 (24/68) | 25.0 (11/44) | ns |
| Pregnancy rate (%) | 67.6 (23/34) | 33.7 (11/30) | |
| Live birth rate (%) | 52.9 (18/34) | 23.3 (7/30) | |
| Abortion rate (%) | 25.0 (6/24) | 36.4 (4/11) | ns |
IVF-ET in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, DNG dienogest, rASRM revised American society for reproduction medicine, FSH follicle-stimulating hormone, HMG human menopausal gonadotropin
Fig. 3Concentrations of inflammatory cytokines in follicular fluids
Thirty patients received 12 weeks of Dienogest treatment (2 mg/day) followed by standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF-ET (DNG group). Thirty-four patients received standard COH with mid-luteal phase GnRH agonist down-regulation (control group). The concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and interleukin-8 (IL-8), were measured in the follicular fluid obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. Values are the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test using Bonferroni’s correction.
Fig. 4Concentrations of oxidative stress markers in follicular fluids
Thirty patients received 12 weeks of Dienogest treatment (2 mg/day) followed by standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF-ET (DNG group). Thirty-four patients received standard COH with mid-luteal phase GnRH agonist down-regulation (control group). The concentrations of the oxidative stress markers 8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) as a marker of DNA damage and hexanoyl-lysine adduct (HEL) as a marker of lipid peroxidation, were measured in the follicular fluid obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. Values are the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test using Bonferroni’s correction.
Fig. 5Concentrations of antioxidants in follicular fluids
Thirty patients received 12 weeks of Dienogest treatment (2 mg/day) followed by standard controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for IVF-ET (DNG group). Thirty-four patients received standard COH with mid-luteal phase GnRH agonist down-regulation (control group). The concentrations of the antioxidants Cu,Zu-superoxide dismutase (Cu,Zn-SOD) and melatonin were measured in the follicular fluid obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. Values are the mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney U-test using Bonferroni’s correction.