Literature DB >> 31830845

Masked English Speech Recognition Performance in Younger and Older Spanish-English Bilingual and English Monolingual Children.

Margaret K Miller1, Lauren Calandruccio2, Emily Buss3, Ryan W McCreery1, Jacob Oleson4, Barbara Rodriguez5, Lori J Leibold1.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare masked English speech recognition thresholds between Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children and to evaluate effects of age, maternal education, and English receptive language abilities on individual differences in masked speech recognition. Method Forty-three Spanish-English bilingual children and 42 English monolingual children completed an English sentence recognition task in 2 masker conditions: (a) speech-shaped noise and (b) 2-talker English speech. Two age groups of children, younger (5-6 years) and older (9-10 years), were tested. The predictors of masked speech recognition performance were evaluated using 2 mixed-effects regression models. In the 1st model, fixed effects were age group (younger children vs. older children), language group (bilingual vs. monolingual), and masker type (speech-shaped noise vs. 2-talker speech). In the 2nd model, the fixed effects of receptive English vocabulary scores and maternal education level were also included. Results Younger children performed more poorly than older children, but no significant difference in masked speech recognition was observed between bilingual and monolingual children for either age group when English proficiency and maternal education were also included in the model. English language abilities fell within age-appropriate norms for both groups, but individual children with larger receptive vocabularies in English tended to show better recognition; this effect was stronger for younger children than for older children. Speech reception thresholds for all children were lower in the speech-shaped noise masker than in the 2-talker speech masker. Conclusions Regardless of age, similar masked speech recognition was observed for Spanish-English bilingual and English monolingual children tested in this study when receptive English language abilities were accounted for. Receptive English vocabulary scores were associated with better masked speech recognition performance for both bilinguals and monolinguals, with a stronger relationship observed for younger children than older children. Further investigation involving a Spanish-dominant bilingual sample is warranted given the high English language proficiency of children included in this study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31830845      PMCID: PMC7839054          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  40 in total

1.  Spondee recognition in a two-talker masker and a speech-shaped noise masker in adults and children.

Authors:  Joseph W Hall; John H Grose; Emily Buss; Madhu B Dev
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Socioeconomic status and child development.

Authors:  Robert H Bradley; Robert F Corwyn
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 24.137

3.  Speech perception in noise for bilingual listeners with normal hearing.

Authors:  Lisa Lucks Mendel; Hannah Widner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2015-07-19       Impact factor: 2.117

4.  Speech Recognition in Nonnative versus Native English-Speaking College Students in a Virtual Classroom.

Authors:  Dorothy Neave-DiToro; Adrienne Rubinstein; Arlene C Neuman
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  Effects of Language History on Sentence Recognition in Noise or Two-Talker Speech: Monolingual, Early Bilingual, and Late Bilingual Speakers of English.

Authors:  Diana Regalado; Jessica Kong; Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 1.493

6.  Classroom noise and children learning through a second language: double jeopardy?

Authors:  Peggy Nelson; Kathryn Kohnert; Sabina Sabur; Daniel Shaw
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Masked Speech Recognition and Reading Ability in School-Age Children: Is There a Relationship?

Authors:  Gabrielle Miller; Barbara Lewis; Penelope Benchek; Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.297

8.  The BKB (Bamford-Kowal-Bench) sentence lists for partially-hearing children.

Authors:  J Bench; A Kowal; J Bamford
Journal:  Br J Audiol       Date:  1979-08

9.  The Bilingual Disadvantage in Speech Understanding in Noise Is Likely a Frequency Effect Related to Reduced Language Exposure.

Authors:  Jens Schmidtke
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-05-13

10.  Processing load induced by informational masking is related to linguistic abilities.

Authors:  Thomas Koelewijn; Adriana A Zekveld; Joost M Festen; Jerker Rönnberg; Sophia E Kramer
Journal:  Int J Otolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-03
View more
  5 in total

1.  Cognitive and Linguistic Contributions to Masked Speech Recognition in Children.

Authors:  Ryan W McCreery; Margaret K Miller; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Speech-in-speech recognition in preschoolers.

Authors:  Christina Dubas; Heather Porter; Ryan W McCreery; Emily Buss; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.437

3.  Contribution of Stimulus Variability to Word Recognition in Noise Versus Two-Talker Speech for School-Age Children and Adults.

Authors:  Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Jacob Oleson; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

4.  A Simplified Approach to Quantifying a Child's Bilingual Language Experience.

Authors:  Lauren Calandruccio; Isabella Beninate; Jacob Oleson; Margaret K Miller; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss; Barbara L Rodriguez
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-07-26       Impact factor: 1.636

5.  Effects of word familiarity and receptive vocabulary size on speech-in-noise recognition among young adults with normal hearing.

Authors:  Meredith D Braza; Heather L Porter; Emily Buss; Lauren Calandruccio; Ryan W McCreery; Lori J Leibold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.