| Literature DB >> 31830715 |
Heba Kandil1, Ahmed Soliman2, Fatma Taher3, Mohammed Ghazal4, Ashraf Khalil4, Guruprasad Giridharan2, Robert Keynton2, J Richard Jennings5, Ayman El-Baz6.
Abstract
Hypertension is a leading cause of mortality in the USA. While simple tools such as the sphygmomanometer are widely used to diagnose hypertension, they could not predict the disease before its onset. Clinical studies suggest that alterations in the structure of human brains' cerebrovasculature start to develop years before the onset of hypertension. In this research, we present a novel computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the early detection of hypertension. The proposed CAD system analyzes magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) data of human brains to detect and track the cerebral vascular alterations and this is achieved using the following steps: i) MRA data are preprocessed to eliminate noise effects, correct the bias field effect, reduce the contrast inhomogeneity using the generalized Gauss-Markov random field (GGMRF) model, and normalize the MRA data, ii) the cerebral vascular tree of each MRA volume is segmented using a 3-D convolutional neural network (3D-CNN), iii) cerebral features in terms of diameters and tortuosity of blood vessels are estimated and used to construct feature vectors, iv) feature vectors are then used to train and test various artificial neural networks to classify data into two classes; normal and hypertensive. A balanced data set of 66 subjects were used to test the CAD system. Experimental results reported a classification accuracy of 90.9% which supports the efficacy of the CAD system components to accurately model and discriminate between normal and hypertensive subjects. Clinicians would benefit from the proposed CAD system to detect and track cerebral vascular alterations over time for people with high potential of developing hypertension and to prepare appropriate treatment plans to mitigate adverse events.Entities:
Keywords: Blood vessels; CAD; CNN; Cerebrovascular segmentation; Hypertension; TOF-MRA; Tortuosity; Vascular diameter
Year: 2019 PMID: 31830715 PMCID: PMC6926373 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.102107
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.881
Fig. 1A computer-aided-diagnosis system for the early detection of hypertension
Fig. 2A sample 2-D output of the preprocessing stage. (a) Original axial slice, (b) Output after bias correction, and (c) Output after GGMRF application on the bias-corrected slice.
Fig. 3A 2-D segmentation output of global and local experiments at two different cross sections above CoW (a,b,c) and below CoW (d,e,f). (a) and (d) Original slices, (b) and (e) Output of global segmentation, and (c) and (f) Output of local segmentation. Segmented vessels are colored in red and the enhanced segmentation results (of the local experiment) are contoured in blue. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Segmentation results of the 3-D CNN approach (local and global experiments) and the global statistical-based approach (GSB)(El-Baz et al., 2012).
| Approach | DSC, % | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3D CNN (local) | 84.4 ± 3.3 | 86.2 ± 3.8 | 99.0 ± 0.03 |
| 3D CNN (global) | 83.2 ± 2.3 | 83.4 ± 5.9 | 99.0 ± 0.03 |
| GSB | 80.1 ± 2.7 | 85.2 ± 3.1 | 97.5 ± 0.9 |
Fig. 4A comparison sample of the segmentation approaches. (a) Ground truth, (b) Output of the 3-D CNN approach, (c) Output of the GSB approach (El-Baz et al., 2012).
Classification accuracy of different classifiers(SVM, Ensemble Bagged Trees (ensemble method: Bag), Linear Discriminant, 2-hidden Layer ANN).
| Classifier | Accuracy | Kernel/metric | validation |
|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 80.3% | Polynomial (cubic) | |
| Ensemble | 83.3% | Bagged trees | |
| Linear Discriminant | 84.8% | Linear | |
| SVM | 87.5% | Polynomial (cubic) | |
Fig. 5The confusion matrix of the classification process.
Fig. 6The ROC curve of the classifier (AUC = 0.9091).
Fig. 7A plot of the training, validation, and testing performance of the classifier.
The confusion matrix of the Framingham prediction model.
| 29 | 3 | ||
| 8 | 10 | ||