| Literature DB >> 31830117 |
Nicholas John Dean, Christopher Pastras, Daniel Brown, Aaron Camp.
Abstract
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225650.].Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31830117 PMCID: PMC6907748 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226643
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 3Sensitivity of the relationship between MD and CMV-infection to leave-one-out analyses.
The overall effect size(s) obtained by omitting any particular study is indicated in a descending (non-cumulative) manner, with the study omitted indicated on the y-axis by (¬), and the respective effect sizes (log(OR)) presented along with 95% C.I. on the RHS. The overall effect obtained prior to the omission of any study is indicated by the bottommost light grey diamond. A: Sensitivity analysis (DL). B: Sensitivity analysis (REML).
Fig 4Distribution of studies by power around the measured and null relationship between MD and CMV-infection.
In each plot, the white, orange, red, and grey-striped regions represent p>0.1, 0.05