Literature DB >> 31830108

Dynamics of photosynthetic responses in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in Colombian Amazon: Implications for breeding strategies.

Armando Sterling1, Natalia Rodríguez1, Esther Quiceno1, Faiver Trujillo1, Andrés Clavijo1, Juan Carlos Suárez-Salazar2.   

Abstract

The rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell.-Arg] is the main source of natural rubber in the world. However, in the Amazon region, its production is reduced by biotic and abiotic limitations, which have prompted breeding programs in order to identify desirable agronomic and physiological indicators. The objective of this study was to analyze the temporal dynamics of photosynthetic responses based on the parameters of leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence in 10 rubber tree clones during the immature phase (pre-tapping) in three large-scale clone trials, during daily cycles and under two climatic periods (dry and rainy) in the Caquetá region (Colombian Amazon). The variables A, LT, ΦPSII, ETR and qP were significantly higher in the dry period, where the highest values of PAR, AT and VPD were seen. In San Vicente del Caguán and Florencia, the highest averages were estimated for A, E and gs, as compared with Belén de los Andaquíes. In Florencia, the highest fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a were recorded. At 9:00 h and 12:00 h, the highest means of A, E, ΦPSII and ETR were observed. The majority of the clones displayed the highest Fv/Fm mean (0.82-0.84) in the dry period. The clones FX 4098, FDR 4575, MDF 180, GU198 and FDR 5788 represent genotypes with the best photosynthetic performance (greater photosynthetic rates and better ability of the photosynthetic apparatus to capture, use and dissipate light energy). These desirable genotypes constitute a promising gene pool for expanding the genetic resource of rubber trees in the Colombian Amazon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31830108      PMCID: PMC6907818          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The rubber tree [Hevea brasiliensis (Willd. Ex Adr. de Juss.) Muell.-Arg] is a South American (Amazon region) native species and is the most important natural rubber source globally [1]. Worldwide, the Asia-pacific region produces 91.2% of natural rubber, Africa produces 6.8% and Central and South America produce 2.0% [2]. Breeding programs for this species have used domestication as the main strategy in order to generate genotypes with high productive performance and tolerance to the principal biotic and abiotic limitations of crops [3]. In this sense, various efforts have been made to select more productive varieties that adapt to different agro-climatic conditions, based on the evaluation of agronomic parameters related to yield, biomass production, water use efficiency and diseases resistance [4-10]. In Colombia, in 2008, SINCHI (Amazonian Institute of Scientific Research), the University of the Amazon and the Association of Rubber Reforesters and Cultivators of Caquetá (ASOHECA) began expanding the genetic resources of H. brasiliensis in Caquetá (Amazon region) by evaluating American-origin clones in large-scale clone trials [11], in order test growth, nutritional behavior, reaction to diseases and pests, phenology and, lastly, to assess latex production (tapping) over a period of 5–10 years. However, an important aspect in rubber breeding programs is the selection of genotypes resistant to environmental variations by monitoring the physiological response of plants under in vivo conditions and evaluating the ability of plants to survive in adverse environmental conditions [12-14]. Knowledge on this response will be useful for understanding the adaptive potential of these rubber clones in different environments, minimizing downtime and maximizing productive performance. In the genetic breeding programs of various crops, a method of rapid and early selection of genotypes with desirable characteristics, such as high yield or tolerance to environmental stress, has been implemented based on the analysis of physiological characteristics [10] as reported in Gmelina arborea Roxb. [15], Coffea spp. [16], Eucalyptus spp. [17], Pinus spp. [18] and Populus spp. [19]. The most commonly used physiological parameters include relationships with photosynthesis because of the immediate response of the photosynthetic apparatus to most biotic and abiotic factors that can cause stress conditions [20]. According to Holá et al. [20], there are three categories of photosynthetic parameters recommended in breeding programs: 1) variables associated with gas exchange, 2) content of photosynthetic pigments (e.g. chlorophyll a and b, carotenoids) and 3) chlorophyll a fluorescence. Brestic et al. [21] mentioned that the gas exchange measurements are supported by continuous measurements of chlorophyll fluorescence that provide quite a precise estimation of photosynthetic performance, and chlorophyll fluorescence represents a unique tool for diagnostics of plant health status, photosynthetic performance as well as effects of plant stress on plants and assessment of plant stress tolerance [22,23]. The photosynthesis is the key process necessary for plant production. Through the process of photosynthesis of C3 plants is the net result of concurrent processes in which light energy is used to produce ATP and NADPH in the light reaction [24] and subsequently, CO2 is fixed (carboxylation) and released (photorespiration, day respiration) [25]. And the gas exchange measurements are essential for the characterization of leaf photosynthetic properties, including stomatal conductance, carboxylation rate, or water use efficiency [25]. Since rubber is a perennial species that requires more than six years of growth before latex can be harvested (unproductive period) and another seven years to assess its potential yield in the productive period [26], it is essential to analyze this type of physiological indicator, which facilitates the identification of the adaptive potential of new genetic materials in the face of various environmental conditions and, thus, optimizes the growth phase in order to reduce the time required to start the productive phase. Since field conditions expose rubber trees to various environmental variations throughout the day and at different times of the year, in this study hypothesized that these variations have differential effects on the photosynthetic performance of H. brasiliensis genotypes with different adaptive capacities. To test this hypothesis, the objective of this study was to analyze the temporal dynamics of photosynthetic responses based on the parameters of leaf gas exchange and chlorophyll a fluorescence in nine promising American clones and the IAN 873 clone (control) during the immature phase (pre-tapping) in large-scale clone trials as a measurement of the clones’ specific adaptation to agro-climatic conditions in the Colombian Amazon.

Materials and methods

Study area

Experimental sites

The experiments were established in July, 2009 on threes farms owned by rubber producers of the Association of Rubber Reforesters and Cultivators of Caquetá (ASOHECA) in the Department of Caquetá (Colombian Amazon), on land with a moderately undulating topography and edaphoclimatic variations. The study area was had compact soils with very low fertility, high acidity and high aluminum contents as a result of being abandoned pastures (> 20 years land use) with an extensive livestock farming traditional in the region. The first experiment was established in Belén de los Andaquíes (1°25'28'' north and 75°52'11'' west, at an elevation of 300 m above sea level). The second experiment was established in Florencia (1°37'03'' north and 75°37'03'' west, at an elevation of 270 m above sea level). The third experiment was established in San Vicente del Caguán (2°2'40.8'' north and 74°55'11.7'' west, at an elevation of 344 m above sea level).

Climate

Caquetá is a humid tropical region that spans two hemispheres, with almost vertical solar radiation during the entire year [27]. Caquetá has a monomodal climatic regime [28,29], subdivided into the “ecological summer” period that corresponds to the months of November to February (dry period) and a “ecological winter” period that corresponds to the months of March to June (rainy period), the other months correspond to an interval close to the average of the precipitation volumes [30]. According to the Caldas-Lang climate classification [27], Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia have a warm-humid climate, while San Vicente del Caguán is a warm-semi-humid climate. Florencia has an average temperature of 25ºC, an average relative humidity of 84%, a solar brightness of 1,465.4 h light and a precipitation of 3,669 mm year-1. Belén de los Andaquíes has an average temperature of 25ºC, an average relative humidity of 85.7%, a solar brightness of 1,462.3 h light and a rainfall of 3,471 mm year-1. San Vicente del Caguán has an average temperature of 25.4ºC, an average relative humidity of 79%, a solar brightness of 1,552.3 h light and a rainfall of 2,503 mm year-1. The microclimatic factors: photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), relative humidity (RH), air temperature (AT) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD) were provided by a SINCHI weather station (Amazonian Institute of Scientific Research) in each experimental site. The data on an average day at 6:00, 9:00, 12:00, 15:00 and 18:000 h was calculated in two climatic period (dry and rainy) for PAR, RH, AT and VPD (Fig 1).
Fig 1

Daily microclimatic variation in study area (Caquetá, Colombia).

Data averages at Belén de los Andaquíes, Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán in two climatic period: dry (November 2017 to January 2018) and rainy (May to June 2018). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), relative humidity (RH), atmosphere temperature (AT) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). The values represent the mean, and the bars the standard error (n = 60).

Daily microclimatic variation in study area (Caquetá, Colombia).

Data averages at Belén de los Andaquíes, Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán in two climatic period: dry (November 2017 to January 2018) and rainy (May to June 2018). Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), relative humidity (RH), atmosphere temperature (AT) and vapor pressure deficit (VPD). The values represent the mean, and the bars the standard error (n = 60).

Soils

Caquetá’s soils are poorly drained, very superficial and deep, with a high aluminum saturation and low base saturation; it has a low quantity of Calcium, Magnesium, Potassium, Phosphorus and Sodium [27]. Belén de los Andaquíes has soils with a pH of 4.8, very acidic, with an organic matter content of 1.07%, organic carbon content of 0.62%, median saturation of 27.7%, and a clay texture. Florencia has soils with a pH of 4.85, very acidic, with an organic matter content of 0.92%, organic carbon content of 0.54%, median saturation of 29.58%, and a clay texture. San Vicente del Caguán has soils with a pH of 4.89, very acidic, with an organic matter content of 0.91%, organic carbon content of 0.60%, median saturation of 28.75%, and a clay-sandy loam texture.

Plant material

The 10 rubber clones used in these trials were H. brasiliensis clones from Central and South America (Table 1) and were chosen because of their good phytosanitary, vigor and production characteristics, mostly achieved on an experimental scale (plant breeding) in countries such as Brazil [31-33] and Ecuador [34]. Clone IAN 873 was chosen as the control since it is one of the most widely planted in countries such as Colombia [35].
Table 1

Plant material description.

The ten rubber tree clones tested in Florencia, Belén de los Andaquíes and San Vicente del Caguán, Caquetá (Colombia), 2017–2018.

CloneParents (Female x Male)Country of originYear of introduction into Caquetá (Colombia)
CDC 56MDX 91 x RRIM 614Guatemala2002
CDC 312AVROS 308 x MDX 40Guatemala2002
GU 198GT 711 x FX 16Guatemala2000
IAN 873 (control)PB 86 x FA 1717Brazil1964
FX 4098PB 86 x B 110Brazil2000
FX 3899 P1 (polyploid)F4542 x AVROS 363Brazil1996
MDF 180Primary clonePeru2002
FDR 4575FDR 18 x FX 3032Brazil2002
FDR 5597HAR 68 x TU 42–525Brazil2002
FDR 5788HAR 8 x MDF 180Brazil2002

AVROS: Algemene Vereniging Rubberplanters Oostkust Sumatra; B: Belterra, Brazil; CDC: Clavellinas Dothidella Cross; FB: Ford Belem; FDR: Firestone Dothidella Resistant; FX: Ford Cross; MDF: Madre de Dios Firestone; MDX: Madre de Dios Cross; HAR: Harbel Estate (Firestone), Liberia; TU: Turrialba, Costa Rica; PB: Prang Besar, Malaysia; GT: Gondang Tapen, Indonesia; FA: Ford Acre; F: Ford, Brasil; GU: Guatemala; IAN: Instituto Agronômico do Norte; RRIM: Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia

Plant material description.

The ten rubber tree clones tested in Florencia, Belén de los Andaquíes and San Vicente del Caguán, Caquetá (Colombia), 2017–2018. AVROS: Algemene Vereniging Rubberplanters Oostkust Sumatra; B: Belterra, Brazil; CDC: Clavellinas Dothidella Cross; FB: Ford Belem; FDR: Firestone Dothidella Resistant; FX: Ford Cross; MDF: Madre de Dios Firestone; MDX: Madre de Dios Cross; HAR: Harbel Estate (Firestone), Liberia; TU: Turrialba, Costa Rica; PB: Prang Besar, Malaysia; GT: Gondang Tapen, Indonesia; FA: Ford Acre; F: Ford, Brasil; GU: Guatemala; IAN: Instituto Agronômico do Norte; RRIM: Rubber Research Institute of Malaysia

Experimental design and maintenance of the plots

A large-scale clonal trail (LSCT) was established in each site [36]. Each LSCT followed a randomized complete block design with 10 treatments (genotypes) and four replications randomly arranged in Fisher blocks, with 60 trees per replicate and per clone. The planting distance was 7.0 m × 3.0 m, providing a density of 476 trees per hectare, for a total LSCT area of 5.04 ha. The unit plot was 1,260 m2, corresponding to 60 trees organized in 3 rows of 20 trees. The trial was surrounded by one row of Colombian mahogany (Cariniana pyriformis Miers) as a windbreaker barrier. Each plot employed fertilization management with a frequency every of six months using a compound fertilizer [N (15%), P2O5 (15%), K2O (15%), CaO (2.2%), S-SO4 (1.7%)] with a dosage of 150 g plant-1, a fertilizer with minor elements [N (8%), P2O5 (5%), CaO (18%), MgO (6%), S (1.6%), B (1%), Cu (0.14%), Mo (0.005%) and Zn (2.5%)] (75 g plant-1) and organic matter (1,000 g plant-1). Weeds were removed with mechanical controls with a frequency of every three months. Phytosanitary controls were not carried out.

Photosynthetic and micro-environmental parameters

The photosynthetic and micro-environmental parameters at the leaf level were measured in each site for two climatic periods: a) dry period: December 13–17, 2017 in San Vicente del Caguán; January 12–16, 2018 in Belén de los Andaquíes; January 16–20, 2018 in Florencia. b) rainy period: May 10–14, 2018 in San Vicente del Caguán; May 19–24, 2018 in Belén de los Andaquíes; June 6–10, 2018 in Florencia. The photosynthetic light response curves (A/PAR), leaf gas exchange, micro-environmental parameters at the leaf level and chlorophyll a fluorescence were measured with a portable photosynthesis system (CIRAS-3 PP Systems, USA) coupled with a chlorophyll fluorescence module (CFM-3 PP Systems, Amsbury, MA, USA). The CO2 flow was maintained at a concentration of 390 μmol mol-1, with a cuvette temperature (CT) of 27°C, an average relative humidity (RH) of 70% and a vapor pressure deficit (VPD) 2.5 kPa on average. The photosynthetic light responses curves (A/PAR) were done per clone in order to determine the constant value of PAR to be used in all measurements with CIRAS-3 in all clones for all three experimental sites (PAR = 1,067 μmol photons m-2 s-1). The PAR intensity was modulated in decreasing order in 16 steps between 2,500 to 0 μmol photons m-2s-1, between 9:00 to 12:00 h. The parameters derived from the A/PAR curve included the maximum photosynthetic rate at saturating light (A), the light compensation point (LCP), the light saturation point (LSP), the dark breathing rate (R), and the apparent quantum efficiency (A), which were fit to the Mitscherlich Model [37]. The gas exchange variables were measured at the foliar level: net photosynthesis rate (A) (μmol CO2 m-2 s-1), transpiration rate (E) (mmol H2O m-2 s-1), stomatal conductance (g) (mmol H2O m-2 s-1), concentration of intercellular CO2 (C) and leaf temperature (LT) [38], as well as the micro-environmental parameters PAR, RH, VPD y AT. The measurements were taken in a daily cycle between 6:00 h and 18:00 h at 3-hour intervals on sunny days. Two healthy leaves with physiological maturity in foliar stage D (140–150 days old) were selected [39], which were fully expanded and found in the middle-third of the canopy, in four trees per clone. The chlorophyll content index (CCI) was also measured as a leaf selection criterion, defining a range between 18 to 38 units in the central leaflet of each leaf. The CCI was measured with a chlorophyll concentration meter (MC-100, Apogee Instruments Inc., USA). The chlorophyll a fluorescence measurement was recorded simultaneously with the same leaves used for the gas exchange parameters. A predawn measurement (3:00 h) was taken to ensure that the leaves were adapted to darkness. Following this period of adaptation to darkness, the leaf tissue was exposed to a weak modulated pulse (0.03 μmol m-2 s-1, non-actinic) to obtain the minimum fluorescence (F). A pulse of white saturating light (6,000 μmol m-2 s-1) was then emitted for 1 s to obtain the maximum fluorescence (F) and, thus, calculate the maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F) [40]. Subsequently, a pulse of actinic light (9,000 μmol photons m-2 s-1) was used to measure the steady state fluorescence yield (F) and the maximum light adapted fluorescence (F'). Once the actinic light was removed, the leaf was exposed to a pulse of far red light in order to oxidize the quinone Q to the maximum and estimate the minimum fluorescence in light-adapted leaves (F'), guaranteeing that the PSII reaction centers opened again. The parameters of chlorophyll fluorescence estimated in dark-adapted leaves were: The efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F'), can be used to provide an estimate of the maximum efficiency of PSII photochemistry in the light-adapted state [23], and was calculated as: The parameter qP gives an indication of the proportion of PSII reaction centers that are already open [41]. This was calculated as: To evaluate the changes in the apparent rate constant for excitation decay by heat loss induced by light relative to this constant rate in the dark, the parameter NPQ was assessed [40]. This parameter was calculated as: The parameters of chlorophyll a fluorescence estimated in light-adapted leaves in the daily cycle (6:00 to 18:00 h) were: The photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII) measures the proportion of the light that is absorbed by chlorophyll associated with PSII and is used in photochemistry [42]; it was calculated as: The apparent electron transport rate (ETR), which is an indicator of overall photosynthetic capacity in vivo, was determined as follows [41]: where PAR is absorbed light, and 0.50 is the factor that accounts for the partitioning of energy.

Data analysis

A mixed general linear model (MGLM) was adjusted to analyze the effect of the fixed factors (sources of variation): climatic period, site, clone, hour and their interactions on the physiological variables. The assumptions of the GLM (normality and homogeneity of variance) were evaluated using an exploratory residual analysis. The nested blocks in the sites and the plots associated with the genotypes within the blocks were included as random effects. The residual variance was modeled to contemplate different variances (Heteroscedasticity), while the residual correlation for the successive observations (hour) carried out on the same plant was contemplated with the models generally used for longitudinal data. Akaike (AIC), Bayesian (BIC) and Log lik criteria were used to select the structure of residual variances and correlations [43]. The analyses were carried out using the lme function in the nlme package [44] in R language software, version 3.4.1 [45], and the interface in InfoStat v. 2017 [46]. Differences between mean variables in all fixed factors were analyzed with Fisher’s LSD post-hoc test at a significance of α = 0.05. The coefficients of correlation (Pearson’s test) between the physiological variables were estimated for each of the periods. To explore the relationships between the physiological variables and the microclimatic parameters associated with 10 rubber tree clones, a Co-Inertia analysis was carried out on the covariance matrix [47]. A Monte Carlo test was carried out to determine the significance of the Co-Inertia values, using ADE-4 [48], included in the R 3.4.1 package [45].

Results

Diurnal changes in the microclimatic factors

According to Fig 1, the PAR (682 μmol photon m-2 s-1), AT (28ºC) and VPD (1.0 kPa) were always highest in the dry period. The highest values of PAR and AT were observed from 9:00 to 12:00 h in San Vicente del Caguán (1,600 μmol photon m-2 s-1 and 32ºC, respectively). In Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia, the highest PAR values were recorded at 12:00 h with 1,434 and 1,274 μmol photon m-2 s-1, respectively. The higher VPD values were observed from 12:00 to 15:00 h (1.6 kPa) in San Vicente del Caguán and Belén de los Andaquíes. The RH acted contrary to the PAR, with the minimum values generally at 12:00 and 15:00 h, below 60%; San Vicente del Caguán recorded the lowest values in this period climatic. Meanwhile, the rainy period reached the maximum RH, with average of 86%, but had the lowest values of AT (26ºC), PAR (558 μmol photon m-2 s-1) and DPV (0.43 kPa). The maximum RH values were recorded at 6:00 and 18:00 h in Florencia, above 95%, and the lowest value was in Belén de los Andaquíes and San Vicente del Caguán at 12:00 and 15:00 h with 75%.

Photosynthetic light response

Significant differences in the photosynthetic response to light were observed between the 10 clones (Table 2). Clone CDC 56 presented the highest A, while clone FDR 5788 had a 21.9% lower CO2 assimilation rate. However, this higher carbon fixation was not always related to greater efficiency of the photosynthetic apparatus (A), as occurred in clone GU 198. Clone FDR 5597 had the highest LCP value, double that registered for clone FDR 4575, which had the lowest value. The LSP in most of the clones was above 1,000 μmol photons m-2s-1, where clone FDR 5597 had the highest value, while GU 198 presented the lowest saturation point. As for R, clone FDR 4575 presented the lowest value in this process, while clone FX 3899 P1 had 63% higher substrate consumption.
Table 2

Parameters derived from the photosynthetic light (A/PAR) response curves of 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in Colombian amazon.

A, light-saturated net carbon assimilation rate; LCP, light compensation point; LSP, light saturation point; R, dark respiration rate; A, quantum efficiency. Data are shown as mean value ± SE (n = 4).

CloneAmax (μmol m-2 s-1)LCP (μmol m-2 s-1)LSP(μmol m-2 s-1)Rd(μmol m-2 s-1)Aqea(μmol CO2 μmol photons-1)
CDC 31212.89 ± 0.44bbc94.52 ± 9.50 a1160.52 ± 28.76 c-2.92 ± 0.35 a2.2 ± 0.2 c
CDC 5615.03 ± 0.25 a74.13 ± 4.62 b1225.41 ± 13.19 b-2.47 ± 0.19 a2.1 ± 0.1 c
FDR 457514.97 ± 0.35 a52.91 ± 7.03 c1054.02 ± 19.62 e-1.99 ± 0.32 b2.4 ± 0.2 c
FDR 559713.11 ± 0.51 b109.23 ± 10.28 a1321.11 ± 30.87 a-3.04 ± 0.34 a1.9 ± 0.2 c
FDR 578811.73 ± 0.18 c96.10 ± 4.29 a1097.21 ± 12.85 d-2.94 ± 0.16 a2.3 ± 0.1 c
FX 3899 P113.62 ± 0.42 b91.67 ± 8.77 a1138.30 ± 25.96 c-3.15 ± 0.37 a2.2 ± 0.2 c
FX 409813.09 ± 0.39 b60.09 ± 8.19 c854.08 ± 25.21 f-2.54 ± 0.43 b3.0 ± 0.3 b
GU 19812.67 ± 0.26 b53.23 ± 5.60 c772.79 ± 16.85 h-2.33 ± 0.30 b3.2 ± 0.3 a
IAN 87312.75 ± 0.34 b93.64 ± 7.35 a1140.27 ± 22.05 c-2.91 ± 0.28 a2.2 ± 0.2 c
MDF 18012.95 ± 0.15 b55.98 ± 3.30 c908.79 ± 9.59 g-2.15 ± 0.16 b2.7 ± 0.1 b

a1x10-3

bStandard error

cValues in each column followed by the same letter do not differ statistically (Fisher’s LSD test, p < 0.05)

Parameters derived from the photosynthetic light (A/PAR) response curves of 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in Colombian amazon.

A, light-saturated net carbon assimilation rate; LCP, light compensation point; LSP, light saturation point; R, dark respiration rate; A, quantum efficiency. Data are shown as mean value ± SE (n = 4). a1x10-3 bStandard error cValues in each column followed by the same letter do not differ statistically (Fisher’s LSD test, p < 0.05)

Foliar micro-environmental parameters

The micro-environmental parameters measured at the foliar level showed that in dry period recorded the highest average values of PAR (258 μmol m-2 s-1), AT (33ºC) and VPD (2.6 kPa). The rainy period recorded the highest average values of RH, with 50%. The maximum values of PAR (560 μmol m-2 s-1), RH (54%) and AT (32ºC) were obtained in San Vicente del Caguán in both climatic periods, while the VPD (2.9 kPa) was higher in Belén de los Andaquíes in the dry period. At the three sites, the maximum PAR (480 μmol m-2 s-1) occurred at midday in the dry period, as compared with the rainy period (430 μmol m-2 s-1). This diurnal pattern for maximum values at midday was also observed for VPD and AT.

Gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence a

Significant effects were observed from all of the principal effects on the gas exchange variables (with the exception of LT) and the fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a (Table 3). There were significant differences in the higher order interaction for all the gas exchange variables, with the exception of the ΦPSII and ETR variables. The parameters F/F, F/F and qP showed significant differences between the periods, between the sites and in the interaction between both factors. qP presented significant differences in the interaction between the factors period, site and clone.
Table 3

Analysis of variance of the fixed effects.

Period (P), site (S) clone (C), hour (H), and their interactions, on the net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO2 concentration (C), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F'), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ).

VariablesF based P values
AEgsCiLTΦPSIIETRFv/FmFv'/Fm'qPNPQ
P<0.00010.0001<0.0001<0.00010.16450.00970.0009<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.5387
S0.00040.00030.00090.0002<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.01020.5893
C<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.12840.44570.05670.6490
H<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001----
P x S0.0012<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.02200.2861
P x C<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.2292<0.00010.00520.00640.17050.07500.00170.1034
P x H<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001----
S x C<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.0079<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.15070.29410.39020.8141
S x H<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001----
C x H<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.05310.0473----
P x S x C<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.0280<0.00010.00080.00090.04200.07320.00210.8236
P x S x H<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001----
P x C x H0.00570.14950.0025<0.0001<0.00010.14380.1550----
S x C x H<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.0001<0.00010.00030.0002----
P x S x C x H0.00890.02710.0124<0.0001<0.00010.06700.0668----

- Does not apply

Analysis of variance of the fixed effects.

Period (P), site (S) clone (C), hour (H), and their interactions, on the net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO2 concentration (C), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F'), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), and non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). - Does not apply Most of the photosynthetic parameters were significantly higher in the rainy period, except for A, LT, Φ, ETR and qP, with higher means in the dry period (Table 4). In San Vicente del Caguán and Florencia, the highest averages were estimated for A, E and g, as compared with Belén de los Andaquíes (Table 4). In Florencia, the highest fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a were recorded.
Table 4

Mean values for the leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a.

Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO2 concentration (C), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F') and photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ).

FactorLevelVariables
AEgsCiLTΦPSIIETRFv/FmFv´/Fm´qPNPQ
Rainy5.21 ± 0.168a bb3.14 ± 0.064 a174.91 ± 5.278 a319.46 ± 1.52 a32.65 ± 0.046 b0.22 ± 0.003 b96.41 ± 1.215 b0.826 ± 0.001 a0.82 ± 0.001 a0.75 ± 0.006 b0.02 ± 0.003 a
PeriodDry5.90 ± 0.168 a2.89 ± 0.064 b133.05 ± 5.278 b301.90 ± 1.52 b32.74 ± 0.046 a0.23 ± 0.003 a100.39 ± 1.215 a0.801 ± 0.001 b0.80 ± 0.001 b0.81 ± 0.006 a0.02 ± 0.003 a
           
Belen4.20 ± 0.256 b2.48 ± 0.097 b116.59 ± 7.892 b318.34 ± 2.02 a33.28 ± 0.062 a0.22 ± 0.004 b100.05 ± 1.628 b0.825 ± 0.002 b0.82 ± 0.002 b0.78 ± 0.008 a0.02 ± 0.004 a
SiteFlorencia6.27 ± 0.256 a3.35 ± 0.097 a176.01 ± 7.892 a314.21 ± 2.02 a32.66 ± 0.062 b0.24 ± 0.004 a109.02 ± 1.628 a0.833 ± 0.002 a0.83 ± 0.002 a0.80 ± 0.008 a0.02 ± 0.004 a
San Vicente6.21 ± 0.256 a3.22 ± 0.097 a169.34 ± 7.892 a299.50 ± 2.02 b32.14 ± 0.062 c0.19 ± 0.004 c86.13 ± 1.628 c0.782 ± 0.002 c0.78 ± 0.002 c0.76 ± 0.008 b0.02 ± 0.004 a
CloneCDC 3126.10 ± 0.289 a3.08 ± 0.112 a146.72 ± 9.577 b302.43 ± 3.14 b32.76 ± 0.096 d0.23 ± 0.006 a105.08 ± 2.641 a0.816 ± 0.004 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.78 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
CDC 565.41 ± 0.289 b3.12 ± 0.112 a166.49 ± 9.577 b311.84 ± 3.14 a32.22 ± 0.096 e0.22 ± 0.006 a100.11 ± 2.641 a0.809 ± 0.001 b0.81 ± 0.003 a0.78 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
FDR 45755.97 ± 0.289 a3.11 ± 0.112 a155.24 ± 9.577 b314.95 ± 3.14 a33.08 ± 0.096 c0.23 ± 0.006 a102.68 ± 2.641 a0.816 ± 0.003 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.78 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
FDR 55974.43 ± 0.289 c2.67 ± 0.112 b117.68 ± 9.577 c314.03 ± 3.14 a33.92 ± 0.096 a0.22 ± 0.006 a99.78 ± 2.641 a0.812 ± 0.003 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.81 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
FDR 57886.39 ± 0.289 a3.29 ± 0.112 a202.80 ± 9.577 a317.05 ± 3.14 a31.59 ± 0.096 f0.20 ± 0.006 b91.00 ± 2.641 b0.814 ± 0.002 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.76 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
FX 3899 P13.36 ± 0.289 d2.25 ± 0.112 c101.13 ± 9.577 c318.97 ± 3.14 a33.53 ± 0.096 b0.20 ± 0.006 b87.64 ± 2.641 b0.814 ± 0.002 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.79 ± 0.012 a0.01 ± 0.006 b
FX 40986.27 ± 0.289 a3.46 ± 0.112 a186.90 ± 9.577 a310.20 ± 3.14 a32.11 ± 0.096 e0.22 ± 0.006 a97.00 ± 2.641 a0.815 ± 0.002 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.77 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
GU 1986.34 ± 0.289 a3.20 ± 0.112 a164.68 ± 9.577 b302.43 ± 3.14 b32.30 ± 0.096 e0.22 ± 0.006 a99.95 ± 2.641 a0.817 ± 0.003 a0.81 ± 0.003 a0.80 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
IAN 8736.24 ± 0.289 a3.23 ± 0.112 a173.61 ± 9.577 b309.35 ± 3.14 a32.47 ± 0.096e0.23 ± 0.006 a103.26 ± 2.641 a0.808 ± 0.004 b0.80 ± 0.003 a0.77 ± 0.012 a0.02 ± 0.006 b
MDF 1805.06 ± 0.289 b2.73 ± 0.112 b124.53 ± 9.577 c307.21 ± 3.14 a32.97 ± 0.096 c0.22 ± 0.006 a97.47 ± 2.641 a0.812 ± 0.004 ab0.81 ± 0.003 a0.75 ± 0.012 a0.04 ± 0.006 a
Hour6:005.46 ± 0.200 c3.24 ± 0.077 b212.15 ± 6.253 a324.42 ± 2.26 b29.30 ± 0.069 e0.19 ± 0.003 c85.04 ± 1.508 c----
9:008.27 ± 0.200 a3.72 ± 0.077 a195.30 ± 6.253 b287.12 ± 2.26 c33.13 ± 0.069 c0.28 ± 0.003 a126.12 ± 1.508 a----
12:007.96 ± 0.200 a3.68 ± 0.077 a159.17 ± 6.253 c273.36 ± 2.26 d35.09 ± 0.069 a0.28 ± 0.003 a126.24 ± 1.508 a----
15:006.04 ± 0.200 b2.88 ± 0.077 c123.04 ± 6.253 d278.18 ± 2.26 d34.30 ± 0.069 b0.24 ± 0.003 b107.90 ± 1.508 b----
18:000.06 ± 0.200 d1.55 ± 0.077 d80.24 ± 6.253 e390.33 ± 2.26 a31.66 ± 0.069 d0.10 ± 0.003 d46.69 ± 1.508 d----

aStandard error

bMeans in each column followed by the same letter not differ statistically (Fisher’s LSD test, p < 0.05)

- Does not apply

Mean values for the leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a.

Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO2 concentration (C), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F') and photochemical (qP) and non-photochemical quenching coefficients (NPQ). aStandard error bMeans in each column followed by the same letter not differ statistically (Fisher’s LSD test, p < 0.05) - Does not apply Overall, the means of A, E, g, ΦPSII and ETR were significantly higher in the clones CDC 312, FDR 4575, FDR 5788, FX 4098, GU 198 and the IAN 873 control (Table 4). The clones with lower averages in parameters A, E and g were FX 3899 P1 and FDR 5597. At 9:00 and 12:00 h, the highest averages of A, E, ΦPSII and ETR were seen (Table 4). The means of g and C were significantly higher at 6:00 h. At 12:00 h the highest average for LT was observed. As shown in Fig 2, A showed an increase between 9:00 and 12:00 h, followed by a progressive decline towards sunset. This pattern only differed in clones CDC 312, FX 4098 and GU 198 in Belén de los Andaquíes in the rainy season, where the peaks occurred between 12:00 and 15:00 h (Fig 2B). In the rainy period in San Vicente del Caguán, it was observed that clones FX 4098, CDC 312, MDF 180, FDR 5597 and FX 3899 P1 recorded the lowest A average at 9:00 h (Fig 2F).
Fig 2

Daily net CO2 assimilation rate (A) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

(A), (C) and (E), dry period; (B), (D) and (F), rainy period; (A) and (B), Belén de los Andaquíes; (C) and (D), Florencia; (E) and (F), San Vicente del Caguán. Means for the dry and rainy periods followed by an inverted triangle and for the clones followed by an asterisk (*) for each time of day were significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test, (p < 0.05). Bars represent the standard error of the mean; n = 4.

Daily net CO2 assimilation rate (A) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

(A), (C) and (E), dry period; (B), (D) and (F), rainy period; (A) and (B), Belén de los Andaquíes; (C) and (D), Florencia; (E) and (F), San Vicente del Caguán. Means for the dry and rainy periods followed by an inverted triangle and for the clones followed by an asterisk (*) for each time of day were significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test, (p < 0.05). Bars represent the standard error of the mean; n = 4. According to Fig 3, independent of the period, all rubber clones had the highest average F/F (0.82–0.84) in Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia (Fig 3A and 3B), as compared with San Vicente del Caguán (0.77–0.79) (Fig 3C). When including the effect of the period, it was observed that most of the clones had the highest average of F/F (0.82–0.84) in the dry period of Belén de los Andaquíes and Florencia. However, in the rainy period of San Vicente del Caguán, all clones presented means significantly similar to those observed in the other two sites.
Fig 3

Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

Measurements carried out in leaves adapted to darkness (predawn, 3:00 h). (A), Belén de los Andaquíes; (B), Florencia; (C), San Vicente del Caguán. Means for the Belén de los Andaquíes, Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán sites followed by an inverted triangle and for the dry and rainy periods followed by an asterisk (*) for each clone were significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test, (p < 0.05). Bars represent the standard error of the mean; n = 4.

Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/F) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

Measurements carried out in leaves adapted to darkness (predawn, 3:00 h). (A), Belén de los Andaquíes; (B), Florencia; (C), San Vicente del Caguán. Means for the Belén de los Andaquíes, Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán sites followed by an inverted triangle and for the dry and rainy periods followed by an asterisk (*) for each clone were significantly different according to Fisher’s LSD test, (p < 0.05). Bars represent the standard error of the mean; n = 4.

Pearson correlation

The Pearson's correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between A and the parameters E and g in both periods, and between E and g, while the correlation of C with these parameters was negative (except with E in the dry period) (Table 5). LT presented a negative correlation with A, E and g in both periods and showed a positive correlation with ΦPSII, ETR, F/F and F'/F' in the dry period, but a negative correlation in the rainy season with ΦPSII and ETR and a positive correlation in both periods with C (Table 5). ΦPSII and ETR had a positive correlation with each other and with the parameters F/F and F'/F' in the two periods (Table 5). In the dry period, A and E presented a negative correlation with ΦPSII, ETR, F/F and F'/F' (Table 5).
Table 5

Pearson's correlation coefficients for leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a measured in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in the Colombian Amazon.

Dry period (below the diagonal) and rainy period (above the diagonal).

ParametersAEgsCiLTΦPSIIETRFv/FmFv'/Fm'qPNPQ
A0.92 **0.85 **-0.53 **-0.61 **0.66 **0.67 **0.33 **0.33 **0.04 ns0.00 ns
E0.89 **0.95 **-0.37 **-0.67 **0.61 **0.61 **0.30 **0.30 **-0.01 ns0.01 ns
gs0.83 **0.93 **-0.23 **-0.73 **0.60 **0.60 **0.23**0.22 **-0.07 ns0.03 ns
Ci-0.53 **0.93 **-0.12ns0.18 *-0.47 **-0.47 **-0.50 **-0.48 **-0.01 ns-0.06 ns
LT-0.61 **-0.63 **-0.72 **0.21 **-0.44 **-0.43 **-0.17 ns-0.16 ns-0.01 ns-0.05 ns
ΦPSII-0.25 **-0.19 *-0.12 ns0.42 **0.43 **1.00 **0.34 **0.34 **-0.08 ns0.00 ns
ETR-0.25 **-0.19 *-0.12 ns0.42 **0.43 **1.00 **0.35 **0.34 **-0.09 ns0.00 ns
Fv/Fm-0.54 **-0.46 **-0.32 **0.57 **0.39 **0.84 **0.84 **0.95 **-0.05 ns0.01 ns
Fv´/Fm´-0.54 **-0.47 **-0.33 **0.56 **0.39 **0.83 **0.83 **0.99 **0.03 ns-0.25 **
qP0.03 ns0.04 ns0.01 ns0.10 ns0.09 ns0.13 ns0.13 ns0.10 ns0.09 ns-0.35 **
NPQ0.11 ns0.20 *0.17 ns0.00 ns-0.04 ns0.08 ns0.08 ns-0.00 ns-0.06 ns0.14 ns

Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/Fm), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F'), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ).

*p < 0.05; significant

**p < 0.01, very significant

ns, not significant.

Pearson's correlation coefficients for leaf gas exchange and fluorescence parameters of chlorophyll a measured in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones in the Colombian Amazon.

Dry period (below the diagonal) and rainy period (above the diagonal). Net CO2 assimilation rate (A), transpiration rate (E), stomatal conductance (g), intercellular CO2 concentration (Ci), leaf temperature (LT), photochemical efficiency of PSII (ΦPSII), electron transport rate (ETR), maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F/Fm), efficiency of excitation energy captured by open PSII reaction centers (F'/F'), photochemical quenching coefficient (qP), non-photochemical quenching (NPQ). *p < 0.05; significant **p < 0.01, very significant ns, not significant.

Co-Inertia analysis

The Montecarlo test of the Co-Inertia analysis was very significant (p < 0.01), which means the co-structure described by axes 1 and 2 was similar to the structures described in the individual analysis (principal component analysis) of each group of variables (micro-environmental and photosynthesis). The first two axes of the Co-Inertia analysis explained 98.52% and 0.92% of the total variability, which indicates that the studied variables were sufficient to explain the ordination observed in the evaluated clones (Fig 4).
Fig 4

Results of the Co-Inertia analysis between the foliar micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis variables in 10 Hevea brasiliensis clones.

(A) a factorial co-Inertia plane for the clones. (B) and (C) the projection of the micro-environmental and photosynthesis vectors, respectively, in the factorial co-Inertia plane. The arrow head represents the position of the clones for the photosynthesis variables, and the other extreme shows the micro-environmental parameters. The bigger the arrow is, the less of a relationship there was between the micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis.

Results of the Co-Inertia analysis between the foliar micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis variables in 10 Hevea brasiliensis clones.

(A) a factorial co-Inertia plane for the clones. (B) and (C) the projection of the micro-environmental and photosynthesis vectors, respectively, in the factorial co-Inertia plane. The arrow head represents the position of the clones for the photosynthesis variables, and the other extreme shows the micro-environmental parameters. The bigger the arrow is, the less of a relationship there was between the micro-environmental parameters and photosynthesis. According to Fig 4, the intensity of the relationship between the studied groups of variables was different in the different clones. The strongest relationship was observed in the clones with the highest gas exchange values and the lowest micro-environmental parameters. The clones with better photosynthetic performance (desirable genotypes: FDR 5788, GU 198 and FX 4098) were located to the right of the ordination axis 1, which demonstrated greater photosynthetic rates (A) and a better ability in the photosynthetic apparatus (PSII) to capture and use light energy (F/F, F'/F' and qP). The FX 3899 P1 and FDR 5597 clones were mainly grouped towards the left of the ordination axis 1, with the lowest photosynthetic performance and the highest values for the micro-environmental parameters (except the RH). The MDF 180 clone, with the best photosynthetic capacity to dissipate light energy (highest value of NPQ) (Table 4), was located on the positive extreme of axis 2 of the ordination plane.

Discussion

Although the Amazon region has rainfall throughout the year, it also has seasonality in its precipitation and radiation [49]. In the present study, not only were there differences in the microclimatic parameters PAR, AT, VPD and RH between the dry and rainy periods, but there was also a significant variation in the physiological response between both periods for all the studied sites. According to Renninger and Phillips [49] and Zhang et al. [50], in the Amazon, environmental radiation is the most important limiting factor for the rubber plant since, in the rainy season, cloudiness is greater and the amount of light (‘sun flecks’) that can be used for photosynthesis is limited [51]. In the present study, this condition was evidenced by a lower A in the rainy season. However, in the rainy period, the g and E were higher, which favored stomatal opening as a result of higher RH values and lower values of AT and VPD [52]. Likewise, the positive correlation observed between A and g and the daytime pattern of these parameters in both periods suggest that both processes lead to a higher photosynthetic performance in the morning hours, where there is greater stomatal openings, favoring higher assimilation rates of CO2 [53]. Light is one of the most important environmental factors that influence both A and g, and the variation in light energy received by the plant can create rapid and extreme fluctuations in leaf temperature and leaf–air vapour pressure deficit to which stomata will respond in conjunction with other environmental cues [54]. In this study, a decreasing pattern for g at midday in both seasons was observed. In citrus and many other species, stomata closure has been observed in plants around midday, the time when reached the highest VPD and temperature, which generates a reduction in stomata conductance (g) and thus a characteristic decrease in CO2 assimilation [51]. Several studies have also reported an increase in photosynthesis in the dry period in the Amazon region because water is not a limiting factor, but light is [55-57]. Although the dry evapotranspiration period is greater because of an increase in radiation and temperature [49], a partial closure of the stomata would be expected because of a higher VPD [52,58] as compared with the rainy period, possibly because of the deep root system of rubber trees, combined with the hydraulic redistribution of the roots [59,60]. In the present study, the variations observed in the photosynthetic responses to light in the different rubber clones responded to the intraspecific genetic variability of this species, where these genotypes showed a greater photosynthetic capacity (higher values in A, LCP, LSP y R) with respect to other clones analyzed in similar studies [8,61]. These variations also showed the diurnal behavior of the clones in the different areas, where they evidenced a diurnal behavior for the net photosynthetic rate (A) in the different periods and sites, with GU 198 and FX 4098 recording higher A values between 9:00 and 12:00 h (higher PAR). These two clones, despite not reporting the highest A, showed high efficiency in the quantum conversion (A), low light compensation points (PCL) and a higher A with a lower PAR, as compared with the other clones. According to Gunasekera et al. [61], in terms of increasing productivity in H. brasiliensis, a low PCL value is important since it keeps the photosynthetic rate (A) positive even when the light intensity is low and, therefore, continues the accumulation of dry matter under these conditions. Clones FX 4098, CDC 312, FDR 4575, FDR 5788 and GU 198 recorded the highest average values of A, E, gs, J and Φ in both climatic periods during the diurnal cycle, reflecting a greater physiological capacity of the plants to maintain the photosynthetic apparatus and express better photosynthetic performance against changes and limitations of the underlying environmental conditions [62]. This behavior is useful for the selection of promising genotypes because clones that present a better adaptation in their photosynthetic apparatus to environmental stress factors will express higher growth rates and greater production potential in the field [10,20,26]. In rubber, photosynthetic rates and efficient water use are physiological variables that have been associated with high-performance clones [9]. Ahmad et al. [10] found that parameters such as A, E, g and stomata characteristics have a positive correlation with latex performance, making they important parameters for the selection of new clones. The decrease in the F/F and F'/F' in the dry period was possibly related to reversible changes in the electron transport flow and heat dissipation used by the photosynthetic apparatus to adjust the quantum efficiency of the PSII and, thus, avoid damage at the level of the photosynthetic system [58], which could explain the negative correlation of these parameters with A in the dry period. However, the values recorded for F/F did not indicate photoinhibition in any of the sites or periods since the values were above 0.78 [40]. Φ is the proportion of absorbed energy being used in photochemistry, and qP gives an indication of the proportion of PSII reaction centers that are open [22]. In this study, Φ, J and qP were higher in both seasons and three LSCT, indicating the rubber’s clones had a high photochemical capacity and a greater efficiency at transferring light energy from the light-harvesting complex to PSII. Also, NPQ indicates that high levels of light energy that could exceed photosynthetic capability will be transformed into thermal dissipation [63], were lower indicate that dissipation of light energy were used in photochemical processes.

Conclusions

The results of the present study show a significant effect of the phenotypic variation of H. brasiliensis on the photosynthetic behavior of rubber, and this, in turn, is directly influenced by the daily and seasonal micro-environmental variations characteristic of the Colombian Amazon. The best photosynthetic performance was observed in the dry period, between 9:00 and 12:00 h, in Florencia and San Vicente del Caguán. These results lead to the conclusion that the evaluation of the temporal dynamics of the parameters of gaseous exchange and fluorescence of chlorophyll a in the rubber clones analyzed in the present study identifies the unproductive phase of the rubber crop, the potential physiological adaptation of these genotypes in the face of different agro-climatic conditions in the Colombian Amazon and, therefore, highlights the greater production potential that these materials may express differentially in the final phase of the productive evaluation. The clones FX 4098, FDR 4575, MDF 180, GU198 and FDR 5788 are the genotypes with the best photosynthetic performance and the best phenotypic plasticity in the different periods and locations that were studied. These desirable genotypes constitute a promising gene pool for expanding the genetic resources of rubber trees in the Colombian Amazon region. (TXT) Click here for additional data file. (TXT) Click here for additional data file.

Maximum photochemical efficiency of PSII (F) in 10 rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) clones under two climatic periods at three sites in Caquetá (Colombia).

(TXT) Click here for additional data file. (TXT) Click here for additional data file.
  12 in total

Review 1.  Chlorophyll fluorescence--a practical guide.

Authors:  K Maxwell; G N Johnson
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 2.  Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency.

Authors:  Tracy Lawson; Silvère Vialet-Chabrand
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 10.151

Review 3.  Net photosynthetic CO2 assimilation: more than just CO2 and O2 reduction cycles.

Authors:  Guillaume Tcherkez; Anis M Limami
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 10.151

4.  Amazon forests maintain consistent canopy structure and greenness during the dry season.

Authors:  Douglas C Morton; Jyoteshwar Nagol; Claudia C Carabajal; Jacqueline Rosette; Michael Palace; Bruce D Cook; Eric F Vermote; David J Harding; Peter R J North
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Leaf development and demography explain photosynthetic seasonality in Amazon evergreen forests.

Authors:  Jin Wu; Loren P Albert; Aline P Lopes; Natalia Restrepo-Coupe; Matthew Hayek; Kenia T Wiedemann; Kaiyu Guan; Scott C Stark; Bradley Christoffersen; Neill Prohaska; Julia V Tavares; Suelen Marostica; Hideki Kobayashi; Mauricio L Ferreira; Kleber Silva Campos; Rodrigo da Silva; Paulo M Brando; Dennis G Dye; Travis E Huxman; Alfredo R Huete; Bruce W Nelson; Scott R Saleska
Journal:  Science       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 6.  Chlorophyll fluorescence: a probe of photosynthesis in vivo.

Authors:  Neil R Baker
Journal:  Annu Rev Plant Biol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 26.379

7.  Sustained diurnal photosynthetic depression in uppermost-canopy leaves of four dipterocarp species in the rainy and dry seasons: does photorespiration play a role in photoprotection?

Authors:  J-L Zhang; L-Z Meng; K-F Cao
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.196

8.  Wheat plant selection for high yields entailed improvement of leaf anatomical and biochemical traits including tolerance to non-optimal temperature conditions.

Authors:  Marian Brestic; Marek Zivcak; Pavol Hauptvogel; Svetlana Misheva; Konstantina Kocheva; Xinghong Yang; Xiangnan Li; Suleyman I Allakhverdiev
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparative analysis of growth and photosynthetic characteristics of (Populus simonii × P. nigra) × (P. nigra × P. simonii) hybrid clones of different ploidides.

Authors:  Xiyang Zhao; Ying Li; Mi Zheng; Xiuyan Bian; Mengran Liu; Yanshuang Sun; Jing Jiang; Fuwei Wang; Shuchun Li; Yonghong Cui; Guifeng Liu; Chuanping Yang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Chlorophyll fluorescence analysis: a guide to good practice and understanding some new applications.

Authors:  E H Murchie; T Lawson
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-08-03       Impact factor: 6.992

View more
  1 in total

1.  Physiological Characteristics of Cultivated Tepary Bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray) and Its Wild Relatives Grown at High Temperature and Acid Soil Stress Conditions in the Amazon Region of Colombia.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Suárez; Amara Tatiana Contreras; José Alexander Anzola; José Iván Vanegas; Idupulapati M Rao
Journal:  Plants (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.