Literature DB >> 31829759

Report of a new six-panel flow cytometry marker for early differential diagnosis of APL from HLA-DR negative Non-APL leukemia.

Mohammad Mosleh1,2, Mahdieh Mehrpouri2, Sasan Ghaffari3,4, Zeinab Saei5, Mahnaz Agaeipoor5, Farzaneh Jadali5, Esmaeil Shahabi Satlsar1,5, Roohollah Gholampour6.   

Abstract

Although AML-M3 (APL) and HLA-DR negative non-APL are characterized by negative HLA-DR antigen, they are different entities with similar morphology in some cases. The aim of this study is the precise, differential diagnosis of APL from HLA-DR negative non-APL by flow cytometry to narrow the diagnosis window. Bone marrow or blood samples of 580 AML patients were analyzed, and flow cytometry and molecular analysis were performed for the diagnosis of blood disorders. In 105 HLA-DR negative AML patients, expression of HLA-DR, CD33, CD117, CD11b, CD64, CD34, CD9 and myeloperoxidase staining pattern were evaluated. Fifty-six patients were diagnosed with APL, and 49 patients were diagnosed with HLA-DR negative non-APL. The APL blasts expressed CD33, CD117, CD64, and CD9 in 100%, 80.3%, 94.6%, and 100% of the cases, respectively. HLA-DR negative non-APL blasts expressed CD33, CD117, CD64 and CD9 in 75.5%, 59.1%, 32.6%, and 73.4% of the cases, respectively. APL cells were negative for HLA-DR, CD11b, and CD34 in 96.4%, 94.6%, and 91.0%, respectively. Blasts in HLA-DR negative non M3-AML were negative for CD11b, CD117, and CD34 in 77.5%, 40.9%, and 22.4%, respectively. We also investigated myeloperoxidase (MPO) staining pattern and found strong diffuse reaction in APL cells while HLA-DR negative non-APL cells showed focal positive reaction. In all of the APL patients, except for one, PML/RARA translocation was positive, and in another case with HLA-DR negative non-APL, PML/RARA and other translocations were not detected. The six-panel combination profile rapidly and specifically identifies APL from other HLA-DR negative AML.

Entities:  

Keywords:  APL; CD64; CD9; HLA-DR negative AML; PML-RARA; flow cytometry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31829759     DOI: 10.1080/00365513.2019.1700427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest        ISSN: 0036-5513            Impact factor:   1.713


  5 in total

1.  Comment: In Response to "CD9 Is a Very Helpful Marker for Discriminating AML-M3 from HLA-DR-Negative Non-M3 AML"

Authors:  Smeeta Gajendra
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.831

Review 2.  CRISPR/Cas9 revitalizes adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Sasan Ghaffari; Nastaran Khalili; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  J Exp Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2021-08-26

3.  Correlation Study on HLA-DR and CD117 (c-Kit) Expressions: Its Prognosis and Treatment Response in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients.

Authors:  Yomna M El-Meligui; Heba E Abd Elrhman; Ahmad Salahuddin; Manal Ali Hamouda; Amira B Kassem
Journal:  Pharmgenomics Pers Med       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  The diagnostic power of CD117, CD13, CD56, CD64, and MPO in rapid screening acute promyelocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Vinh Thanh Tran; Thang Thanh Phan; Hong-Phuoc Mac; Tung Thanh Tran; Toan Trong Ho; Suong Phuoc Pho; Van-Anh Ngoc Nguyen; Truc-My Vo; Hue Thi Nguyen; Thao Thi Le; Tin Huu Vo; Son Truong Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-08-26

5.  CD9 Is a Very Helpful Marker for Discriminating AML-M3 from HLA-DR-Negative Non-M3 AML

Authors:  Esmaeil Shahabi Satlsar; Mohammad Mosleh; Mahdieh Mehrpouri
Journal:  Turk J Haematol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 1.831

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.