Literature DB >> 31829721

Emotion recognition from posed and spontaneous dynamic expressions: Human observers versus machine analysis.

Eva G Krumhuber1, Dennis Küster2, Shushi Namba3, Datin Shah1, Manuel G Calvo4.   

Abstract

The majority of research on the judgment of emotion from facial expressions has focused on deliberately posed displays, often sampled from single stimulus sets. Herein, we investigate emotion recognition from posed and spontaneous expressions, comparing classification performance between humans and machine in a cross-corpora investigation. For this, dynamic facial stimuli portraying the six basic emotions were sampled from a broad range of different databases, and then presented to human observers and a machine classifier. Recognition performance by the machine was found to be superior for posed expressions containing prototypical facial patterns, and comparable to humans when classifying emotions from spontaneous displays. In both humans and machine, accuracy rates were generally higher for posed compared to spontaneous stimuli. The findings suggest that automated systems rely on expression prototypicality for emotion classification and may perform just as well as humans when tested in a cross-corpora context. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31829721     DOI: 10.1037/emo0000712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  7 in total

1.  A Novel Test of the Duchenne Marker: Smiles After Botulinum Toxin Treatment for Crow's Feet Wrinkles.

Authors:  Nancy Etcoff; Shannon Stock; Eva G Krumhuber; Lawrence Ian Reed
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-01-12

2.  Comparing supervised and unsupervised approaches to multimodal emotion recognition.

Authors:  Marcos Fernández Carbonell; Magnus Boman; Petri Laukka
Journal:  PeerJ Comput Sci       Date:  2021-12-24

3.  The spatio-temporal features of perceived-as-genuine and deliberate expressions.

Authors:  Shushi Namba; Koyo Nakamura; Katsumi Watanabe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 3.752

4.  Opportunities and Challenges for Using Automatic Human Affect Analysis in Consumer Research.

Authors:  Dennis Küster; Eva G Krumhuber; Lars Steinert; Anuj Ahuja; Marc Baker; Tanja Schultz
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  A performance comparison of eight commercially available automatic classifiers for facial affect recognition.

Authors:  Damien Dupré; Eva G Krumhuber; Dennis Küster; Gary J McKeown
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  EEG-Based Emotion Recognition Using an Improved Weighted Horizontal Visibility Graph.

Authors:  Tianjiao Kong; Jie Shao; Jiuyuan Hu; Xin Yang; Shiyiling Yang; Reza Malekian
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-07       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 7.  Review: Posed vs. Genuine Facial Emotion Recognition and Expression in Autism and Implications for Intervention.

Authors:  Paula J Webster; Shuo Wang; Xin Li
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.