Literature DB >> 31829218

An analysis of orphan medicine expenditure in Europe: is it sustainable?

Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz1, Christina Palaska2, Tom Kelly3, Adam Hutchings3, Adam Parnaby4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Orphan medicinal product (OMP) prices are considered by some to be a challenge to the sustainability of healthcare expenditure. These concerns are compounded by the increasing number of OMPs receiving marketing authorisation (MA) annually. The aim of this study was to explore the sustainability of OMP expenditure within the context of total European pharmaceutical expenditure.
METHODS: Using historical IQVIA data, an analysis was conducted on total pharmaceutical and OMP expenditure in eight countries (using values / volumes) in the branded, non-branded and overall pharmaceutical market. Country level and aggregated data was considered for EU5 countries, Austria, Belgium and Ireland. Three key analyses were conducted: 1.The OMP share of total pharmaceutical expenditure was calculated from 2000 to 2017, to assess its evolution over time.2.The results of this analysis were compared with a 2011 forecast of OMP budget impact.3.The evolution of the total pharmaceutical market and its different segments (branded OMPs, non-OMP branded and unbranded) were assessed by estimating the compound annual growth rate (CAGR) and percentage of pharmaceutical expenditure for each market segment from 2010 to 2017.
RESULTS: Across countries, OMP share of total pharmaceutical expenditure has increased each year since 2000, rising to 7.2% of total pharmaceutical expenditure in 2017. OMP expenditure has increased at a CAGR of 16% since 2010. The number of OMPs receiving MA each year showed a CAGR of 11% since 2001, four percentage points greater than the CAGR for all medicines receiving MA over the same period. OMP share of total pharmaceutical expenditure is higher than forecasted in 2011 due to slower than expected growth in the non-OMP market. OMP growth has been offset by reduced expenditure in the general market and increased use of generics and biosimilars.
CONCLUSIONS: Relative spending on OMPs has increased over the last 20 years, but this has been largely compensated for within the current allocation of total pharmaceutical spending by flat expenditure for non-OMPs and increased volumes of (lower-priced) generics/biosimilars, reflecting a shift towards expenditure in higher cost, lower volume patient populations and a shift in drug development towards more specialised targeting of diseases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Healthcare sustainability; Orphan medicinal product; Orphan medicines expenditure; Rare disease

Year:  2019        PMID: 31829218     DOI: 10.1186/s13023-019-1246-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis        ISSN: 1750-1172            Impact factor:   4.123


  8 in total

Review 1.  Methodological Quality Assessment of Budget Impact Analyses for Orphan Drugs: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Khadidja Abdallah; Isabelle Huys; Kathleen Claes; Steven Simoens
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Orphan Medicine Incentives: How to Address the Unmet Needs of Rare Disease Patients by Optimizing the European Orphan Medicinal Product Landscape Guiding Principles and Policy Proposals by the European Expert Group for Orphan Drug Incentives (OD Expert Group).

Authors:  Annemieke Aartsma-Rus; Marc Dooms; Yann Le Cam
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 5.810

3.  Availability and Accessibility of Orphan Medicinal Products to Patients in Slovakia in the Years 2010-2019.

Authors:  Tatiana Foltanova; Alan Majernik; Eva Malikova; Stanislava Kosirova
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Trends in orphan drug use and spending among children and adolescents during 2010-2020 in Korea.

Authors:  Jung Yeon Oh; Jin Yong Lee; Dong-Sook Kim
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-31       Impact factor: 5.988

5.  Comparison of US and EU Prices for Orphan Drugs in the Perspective of the Considered US Orphan Drugs Act Modifications and Discussed Price-Regulation Mechanisms Adjustments in US and European Union.

Authors:  Paweł Żelewski; Michał Wojna; Katarzyna Sygit; Elżbieta Cipora; Izabela Gąska; Mateusz Niemiec; Mateusz Kaczmarski; Tomasz Banaś; Beata Karakiewicz; Artur Kotwas; Paulina Zabielska; Olga Partyka; Monika Pajewska; Edyta Krzych-Fałta; Ewa Bandurska; Weronika Ciećko; Aleksandra Czerw
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.614

6.  Are supplemental appraisal/reimbursement processes needed for rare disease treatments? An international comparison of country approaches.

Authors:  Elena Nicod; Amanda Whittal; Michael Drummond; Karen Facey
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 4.123

7.  Moving somatic gene editing to the clinic: routes to market access and reimbursement in Europe.

Authors:  Tessel Rigter; David Klein; Stephanie S Weinreich; Martina C Cornel
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.246

8.  How Much Does It Cost to Research and Develop a New Drug? A Systematic Review and Assessment.

Authors:  Michael Schlander; Karla Hernandez-Villafuerte; Chih-Yuan Cheng; Jorge Mestre-Ferrandiz; Michael Baumann
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 4.981

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.